Computerized dispute resolution system and method

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Electronic negotiation

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S004000, C705S037000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10683819

ABSTRACT:
An automated method capable of multiple rounds for settling a dispute among adverse parties which dispute involves monetary values is described together with an automated system for carrying out such method.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3573747 (1971-04-01), Adams et al.
patent: 3581072 (1971-05-01), Nymeyer
patent: 5077665 (1991-12-01), Silverman et al.
patent: 5329589 (1994-07-01), Fraser et al.
patent: 5495412 (1996-02-01), Thiessen
patent: 5668953 (1997-09-01), Sloo
patent: 5689652 (1997-11-01), Lupien et al.
patent: 5794207 (1998-08-01), Walker et al.
patent: 5895450 (1999-04-01), Sloo
patent: 5905975 (1999-05-01), Ausubel
patent: 5924082 (1999-07-01), Silverman et al.
patent: 5956687 (1999-09-01), Wamsley et al.
patent: 5983205 (1999-11-01), Brams et al.
patent: 6052674 (2000-04-01), Zervides et al.
patent: 6112181 (2000-08-01), Shear et al.
patent: 6112189 (2000-08-01), Rickard et al.
patent: 6131087 (2000-10-01), Luke et al.
patent: 6141653 (2000-10-01), Conklin et al.
patent: 6208973 (2001-03-01), Boyer et al.
patent: 6243691 (2001-06-01), Fisher et al.
patent: 6330551 (2001-12-01), Burchetta et al.
patent: 6366925 (2002-04-01), Meltzer et al.
patent: 6847935 (2005-01-01), Solomon et al.
patent: 6954741 (2005-10-01), Burchetta et al.
patent: 2002/0007362 (2002-01-01), Collins et al.
patent: WO-97/04410 (1997-02-01), None
patent: WO-97/15362 (1997-05-01), None
Ferling, R.L., et al. “New Plans, New Policies,” Best's Review—Life-Health Insurance Edition, vol. 92, No. 8, p. 85, Dec. 1991.
Lewthwaite, G.A., “Paying for Years of Pain,” Baltimore Morning Sun, Final Edition, p. 2A, Apr. 22, 1997.
Attrino, “P-C Agents Issue Checkbook Claims,” National Underwriter, vol. 12, No. 29, pp. 15, 18, Jul. 20, 1998.
Anon., “Consultation on Periodical Payments for Future Loss,” M2 Presswire, Mar. 13, 2002.
Anon., “Powerball Tickets on Sale in Pennsylvania Jun 27!” Business Wire, Jun. 6, 2002.
Pryor, E.S., “After the Judgment,” Virginia Law Review, vol. 88, No. 8, pp. 1757-1830, Dec. 2002.
Blostin, A.P., “Distribution of Retirement Income Benefits,” Monthly Labor Review, p. 3, Apr. 2003.
The International Dictionary of Applied Mathematics, Van Nostrand, Princeton, 1960, p. 593.
Zeng, D.Z. et al., “Intrinsic Gap and Final-Double-Offer Arbitration,” in IFAC Large Scale Systems (conference proceedings), 1992.
Zeng, D.-Z., et al., “Double-offer Arbitration,” Mathematical Social Sciences, vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 147-170, Jun. 1996.
Hines, B.L., “Arbitration Spells Relief,” Best's Review—Property-Casualty Insurance Edition, vol. 86, p. 47, Jan. 1986.
Colen, F.H., “Proactive Patent Protection,” High Technology Business, vol. 9, No. 8, p. 14, Sep.-Oct., 1989.
SchWeber, C., “Your Telephone May Be a Party Line,” Mediation Quarterly, vol. 7, No. 2, pp. 191-195, Winter 1989.
Denenberg, T.S., “The Electronic Arbitrator,” Arbitration Journal, vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 48-52, Mar. 1990.
Low, “Mediation vs. Litigation: How You Can Cut Costs,” Texas Banking, vol. 80, No. 5, pp. 8-9, May 1991.
Thiessen, E.M. et al., “Computer Assisted Negotiation of Multiobjective Water REsources Conflicts,” Water REsources Bulletin, vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 163-177, Jan./Feb. 1992.
Brams, S.J. and Merril, S., “Arbitration Procedures with the Possibility of Compromise,” Control and Cybernetics, vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 131-149, 1992.
Mullins, R., “Mediation, Arbitration Venues Offer Corporate Litigants Justice-in-Time,” Business Journal-Milwaukee, vol. 9, No. 39, p. S6, Jul. 4, 1992.
Yeend, N.N., “Electronic Alternative Dispute Resolution System Design,” Mediation Quarterly, vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 193-194, Winter 1993.
Jackson, W., “Mediation Proposed for Securities Disputes,” Business-First-Columbus, vol. 9, No. 31, p. 4, Apr. 5, 1993.
Anon., “Title IV—Judicial Reforms,” Health Legislation and Regulation, vol. 20, No. 3, Jan. 19, 1994.
Skrzycki, C., “Writing Rules in Cyberspace,” “The Regulators: An Electronic Negotiation—Modern Times,: OSHA to Try Writing Rules in Cyberspace,” The Washington Post, Feb. 8, 1994, p. D1.
Helie, J., “Conflict and Conflict Resolution on Electronic Networks,” Jun. 1994.
SchWeber, C., “The Use of Technology in Conflict Resolution,” paper presented at the European Conference on Peacemaking and Conflict Resolution, Oct. 1994, San Sebastian, Spain.
Macduff, I., Flames on the Wires: Mediating from an Electronic Cottage, Negotiation Journal, vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 5-15, Jan. 1994.
Grob, K., et al., “Discovering Opportunities in Alternative Dispute Resolution: A Step-by-Step Guide for Getting Involved,” Outlook, vol. 62, No. 4, p. 18, Winter 1995.
Ste[henson, M.R., “Rescuing ADR from its Advances,” Public Administration REview, vol. 55, No. 4, pp. 385-388, Jul./Aug. 1995.
Anon., “Online Courtroom Service Introduced for US Disputers,” Internet Business News, Jul. 1, 1996.
Anon., “Pru Settlement Stalls State ADR Plan,” Insurance Regulator,, vol. 8, No. 37, p. 1, Sep. 30, 1996.
Robbins, S.B., “Lowering the Cost of the Doing Business through ADR,” Distribution, col. 96, No. 11, pp. 58-59, Oct. 1997.
Hill, R., “Will Cyberspace Use Cybercourts,” International Commercial Litigation, Issue 23, pp. 33-35, Oct. 1997.
Mandell, J., “Cyberspace Conflicts,” Software Magazine, vol. 18, No. 4, p. 20, Mar. 1998.
Negussie,M.M., “How to Select a Mediator,” Defense Counsel Journal, vol. 65, No. 2, pp. 256-261, Apr. 1998.
Anon., “Pharmacists' Antitrust Class-Action Lawsuit Opens,” Marketletter, Oct. 5, 1998.
Online Ombuds Office Web site, http://aaron.sbs.umass.edu/center/ombuds/default.htm and /description.html, Apr. 14, 2000.
Levin, A., “Online Claim Settlement Services Hit the Net,” Nov. 9, 1998.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Computerized dispute resolution system and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Computerized dispute resolution system and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Computerized dispute resolution system and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3759561

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.