Computer system for displaying representations of processes

Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

707 3, 707 4, 707100, 707103, 39580028, G06F 1730

Patent

active

058192700

ABSTRACT:
A computer system for displaying representations of processes, including models of complex business transactions in an information management system. The system includes a memory for storing the representations of the processes. The representation of a process includes an indication of processes into which the process is decomposed. Additionally, specializations of the process are represented. Alternatively, the dependencies among processes in a decomposition are indicated along with associated coordination processes. An indication of where a process is used within another process may also be provided. Specializations may also be bundled together to allow for evaluation of alternatives within a bundle.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4736320 (1988-04-01), Bristol
patent: 4809170 (1989-02-01), Leblanc
patent: 4905163 (1990-02-01), Garber et al.
patent: 4974160 (1990-11-01), Bone
patent: 5195178 (1993-03-01), Krieger et al.
patent: 5206950 (1993-04-01), Geary
patent: 5212771 (1993-05-01), Gene et al.
patent: 5233513 (1993-08-01), Doyle
patent: 5237691 (1993-08-01), Robinson
patent: 5249300 (1993-09-01), Bachman et al.
patent: 5261100 (1993-11-01), Fujinami
patent: 5287515 (1994-02-01), Murai
patent: 5361360 (1994-11-01), Ishigami
patent: 5471636 (1995-11-01), Hauck
patent: 5487131 (1996-01-01), Kassatly et al.
patent: 5524246 (1996-06-01), Hurley
patent: 5535388 (1996-07-01), Takeda
patent: 5542070 (1996-07-01), Leblanc
patent: 5544308 (1996-08-01), Giordano
patent: 5583983 (1996-12-01), Schmitter
patent: 5587935 (1996-12-01), Brooks
patent: 5699310 (1997-12-01), Garloff et al.
Baligh, H.H., Burton, R.M. and Obel, B. (1990), Devising expert systems in organization theory: The Organizational Consultant. In M. Masuch (Ed.), Organization, Management, and Expert Systems (pp. 35-57), Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Chandrasekaran, B. (1983), Towards a taxonomy of problem solving types, Al Magazine, 4(1), 9-17.
Clancey, W.J. (1983), The epistemology of a rule-based expert system--A framework for explanation, Artificial Inteligence, 20(3), 215-251.
Lee, J. (1990), Sibyl: A tool for managing group decision rationale, In ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW '90), Los Angeles, CA.
Malone, T.W., Lai, K.-Y. and Fry, C. (1992). Experiments with Oval: A radically tailorable tool for cooperative work. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW'92). Toronto, Ontario.
Schank, R.C. (1982). Dynamic Memory: A theory of reminding and learning in computers and people. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Stefix, M. and Bobrow, D.G. (1986). Object-oriented programming: Themes and variations. Al Magazine, (Spring), 40-62.
Booch, G., Object Oriented Design with Applications. 1991, Redwood City, California: Benjamin/Cummings.
deChampeaux, D. Object-Oriented Analysis and Top-Down Software Development. in ECOOP '91, European Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, 1991. Geneva, Switzerland: Springer-Verlag.
Krueger, C.W., Software reuse, ACM Computing Surveys, 1992. 24(2): pp. 131-183.
Malone, T.W., K., Crowston, J. Lee, and B. Pentland. Tools for Inventing Organizations: Toward a Handbook of Organizational Processes. in Second IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies Infrastructure for Collaboratie Enterprises. 1993. Morgantown, West Virginia.
Nierstrasz, O. Regular Types for Active Objects, in Conference on Object-Oriented Programming: Systems, Languages, and Applications. 1993. Washington, D.C.: Association for Computing Machinery.
Rumbaugh, J., M. Blaha, W. Premerlani, F. Eddy, and W. Lorensen, Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. 1991, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Wegner, P. and S.B. Zdonik, Inheritance as an Incremental Modification Mechanism or What Like Is and Isn't Like, in European Conference on Object Oriented Programming, 1988, Oslo, Norway: Springer-Verlag.
Bhandaru, N. and Croft, W.B. An architecture for supporting goal-based cooperative work. In Multi-User Interfaces and Applications, S. Gibbs and A.A. Verrijin-Stuart (Ed.), Elsevier (North Holland), Amsterdam, 1990, pp. 337-354.
Lai, K.Y., Malone, T.W. & Yu, K.C. Object Lens: A `spreadsheet` for cooperative work. ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Oct. 1988, 6, 332-353.
Malone, T.W., Grant, K.R., Lai, K.Y., Rao, R. & Rosenblitt, D.A. Semi-structured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination, ACM Transactions on Office Information systems, 1987, 5, 115-131.
Richard M. Adler. Emerging Standards for Component Software, IEEE Computer, Mar. 1995, pp. 68-77.
James F. Allen. Towards a General Theory of Action and Time. Artificial Intelligence 23 (1984), pp. 123-154.
B.P. Allen and S.D. Lee. A Knowledge-Based Environment for the Development of Software Parts Composition Systems. In Proceedings, 12th Int'l Conference on Software Engineering, 1989, pp. 104-112.
R. Allen. Formalizing Software Architectural Style. ACM SIGSOFT Third Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering, Mar. 9, 1995.
J.M. Andreoli, H. Gallaire and R. Pareschi. Rule-Based Object Coordination. In Proceedings, ECOOP '94 Workshop on Coordination, 1994.
Brian W. Beach. Connecting Software Components with Declarative Glue. In Proceedings, 14th Int'l Conference on Software Engineering, 1992, pp. 120-137.
J.R. Callahan and J.M. Purtilo. A Packaging System For Heterogeneous Execution Environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 17, No. 6, Jun. 1991, pp. 626-635.
N. Carriero and D. Gelernter. How to Write Parallel Programs: A Guide to the Perplexed. ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 21, No. 3, Sep. 1989, pp. 324-357.
C. Dellarocas, J. Lee, T.W. Malone, K. Crowston and B. Pentland. Using a Process Handbook to Design Organizational Processes. In Proceedings, AAAI Spring Symposium on Computational Organization Design, Mar. 21-23, 1994, Stanford, CA pp. 50-56.
Frank DeRemer and Hans H. Kron. Programming-in-the-Large Versus Programming-in-the-Small, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. SE-2, No. 2, Jun. 1976, pp. 80-86.
E. Gamma, R. Helm, R. Johnson, and J. Vlissides. Design Patterns: Abstractions and reuse of object-oriented design. In Proceedings, ECOOP '93, Springer Verlag LNCS 707, Jul. 1993.
David Garlan and Mary Shaw. An Introduction To Software Architecture. Technical Report CMU-CS-94-166, Jan. 1994. Also appears as CMU/SEI-94-TR-21, ESC-TR-84-21.
D. Garlan, R. Allen, and J. Ockerbloom. Exploiting Style in Architectural Design Environments. Proceedings, ACM SIGSOFT '94 Symposioum on Foundations of Software Engineering, New Orleans, LA, Dec. 1994.
D. Garlan, R. Allen and J. Ockerbloom. Architectural Mismatch or Why it's hard to build systems out of existing parts. In Proceedings, 17th International Conference on Software Engineering, Seattle, WA Apr. 1995.
Phillip B. Gibbons. A stub Generator for Multilangage RPC in Heterogeneous Environments. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. SE-13, No. 1, Jan. 1987, pp. 77-87.
Joseph A. Goguen. Reusing and Interconnecting Software Components. IEEE Computer, Feb. 1986, pp. 16-28.
R. Hayes and R.D. Schlichting. Facilitating Mixed Language Programming in Distributed Systems, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 13, No. 12, Dec. 1987, pp. 1254-1264.
T. Capers Jones. Reusability in Programming: A Survey of the State of the Art. IEEE Transactions on Software Enginnering, vol. 10, No. 5, Sep. 1984, pp. 488-494.
M.B. Jones, R.F. Rashid and M.R. Thompson, Matchmaker: An Interface Specification Language for Distributed Processing. In Proceeding, 12th ACM Symposium of Principles of Programming Languages, 1985, pp. 225-235.
Paul Kogut and Paul Clements. Features of Architecture Representation Languages. Carnegie Mellon University Technical Report CMU/SEI. Number to be assigned. Draft of Dec. 1994.
S.S. Lam and A.U. Shankar. A Theory of Interfaces and Modules I-Composition Theorem. IIEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 20, No. 1, Jan. 1994, pp. 55-71.
David Alex Lamb. IDL: Sharing Intermediate Representations. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, vol. 9, No. 3, Jul. 1987, pp. 297-318.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Computer system for displaying representations of processes does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Computer system for displaying representations of processes, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Computer system for displaying representations of processes will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-93664

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.