Supports – Mirror or picture type – Bracket
Reexamination Certificate
1999-06-30
2001-04-24
Ramirez, Ramon O. (Department: 3632)
Supports
Mirror or picture type
Bracket
C359S290000, C359S291000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06220561
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
The present invention relates generally to tilting micromechanisms, and more specifically to a new class of micromechanisms able to attain large tilt angles owing to the use of multiple floating pivot structures.
Although there is no precise referent for the term “micromechanical”, its common use is to machinery whose size scale makes invalid most of our assumptions about machinery of ordinary dimensions. For example, whereas at ordinary dimensions the strength of materials is usually limited by mechanisms involving motion and multiplication of dislocations in response to applied stress, in the micromechanical regime surface erosion and cleavage modes of failure are more common. Again, whereas at ordinary dimensions fluid lubrication of frictionally related elements (e.g., an axle and a shaft bearing) is one of a handful of practical choices, in the micromechanical regime the viscous shear stress of a lubricant increases in inverse proportion to the size scale of the apparatus, increasing the energy dissipation rate to unusable levels.
When the change in size scale renders conventional practice invalid, it also enables new approaches toward micromechanical functionality. An effective replacement for fluid lubricants can be a surface layer of a solid which is (usually) either amorphous or polycrystalline, is reasonably strong, forms a smooth film on the component surfaces, and has a surface structure that resists bonding with itself.
Consistent with common practice, in this specification the term ‘micromechanical’ is associated with mechanical apparatus whose functional components have sizes ranging from about 1 mm to about 1 &mgr;m. Such micromechanical apparatus can be made of a wide variety of materials, but perhaps the most common system is a combination of polycrystalline silicon, amorphous silicon, silicon oxides, and silicon nitride. This material system has high material strength and rigidity, high resistance to fracture, can be doped to provide electrically conducting regions, and is relatively easy to directly integrate with microelectronics at a chip level.
A common mechanism in micromechanical apparatus is a tilt stage, whose function is to provide an attached element with a controllable amount of tilt along a predetermined axis or axes. The attached element can be an intrinsic part of the apparatus (e.g., as in an escapement), or an external element which is to be positioned and directed by the apparatus (e.g., a micromirror). The implementations described in this specification will be for micromirror tilt stages, but this should not be taken as an implicit limitation on the scope of the present invention.
A typical prior art micromirror tilt stage is shown in
FIGS. 1
a
-
1
d.
FIG. 1
a
shows a transparent top view of the tilt stage, and
FIG. 1
b
shows a side view. Micromirror
11
is mounted on top of base
10
by flexible pivot
12
. (Note that
11
could as easily be a mounting platform for a micromirror or for some other component. The present identification is made for simplicity of description, and not to limit the scope of the present invention.) The top surface of micromirror
11
, if necessary, is polished flat and/or coated with a reflective layer.
Capacitor plates
13
and
14
provide the forces which tilt the micromirror. In one working arrangement the micromirror is doped to the point of being a good conductor, and is grounded through flexible pivot
12
and base
10
, both of which are also appropriately doped. Capacitor plates
13
and
14
are electrically insulated from the base
10
. When a voltage is applied to capacitor plate
13
, the micromirror
11
tilts to the left. When a voltage is applied to capacitor plate
14
, the micromirror
11
tilts to the right.
If the applied voltage is large enough, the micromirror
11
will tilt until it hits a solid stop. This condition is of interest for designers, as it provides for a precise amount of tilt, and at the same time helps prevent vibration of the micromirror. Two common solid stops are illustrated here.
FIG. 1
c
shows a maximum leftward tilt, the magnitude of the tilt being limited by contact between the micromirror
11
and the base
10
. This provides a limitation in many designs, because the micromirror structure is fabricated by growing layers of structural and sacrificial material on top of the base, and then removing the sacrificial material. Practical limitations of such processes limit the thickness of the sacrificial layers to a few microns at most. A typical micromirror can be perhaps 100 &mgr;m across, with a gap separating the micromirror from the base of about 1 &mgr;m. In this case, the maximum tilt angle is limited to about 1°.
FIG. 1
d
shows a maximal rightward tilt, where the magnitude of the tilt is limited by the presence of stop post
15
. Such a stop post can be used if a smaller maximum tilt is desired than results from contact between the micromirror and the base.
The tilt stage described above allows tilt along arbitrary directions. This is desirable for some applications, and not desirable for others. A related tilt stage with an additional torsional pivot can be arranged, as shown in
FIG. 2
, to define a single restricted tilt axis. Within this specification and the attached claims, a tilt stage has a restricted tilt axis (or multiple restricted tilt axes) only when the structure of the tilt stage substantially restricts the tilting motions of the tilt stage to those corresponding to that restricted tilt axis (or to those restricted tilt axes). Equivalently, the amount of force which must be supplied in the initial stages of tilting about a restricted tilt axis is a local minimum.
In this case of
FIG. 2
, tilting around the axis defined a line between the two torsional pivots and parallel to the base surface is much easier than in any other direction. This axis is therefore a restricted tilt axis.
In another implementation of this prior art device, a second pair of capacitor plates can be added to the base, thereby allowing an arbitrary tilt direction to be driven electrostatically, as shown in FIG.
3
.
Many equivalent mechanisms are known in the art. In particular, whereas the pivoting motion was provided above by the bending of a flexible pivot connecting the micromirror to the base, many other structures produce equivalent devices. For example, the micromirror can be attached by a pair of torsional pivots attached to the sides of the micromirror and to a mounting frame which is attached to the base. The top surface of a cantilever beam can be used as a micromirror or as a micromirror mount. Such a cantilever mount can provide multiaxis tit capability when electrostatic actuators are arranged so that both bending of the cantilever and rotation about the cantilever are driven.
Many applications for tilt stages, especially those involving the use of micromirror arrays in active optical processing or display applications, require or can beneficially use larger tilt angles than are accessible using the basic prior art mechanisms described above. However, the process-related limitation to the extent of tilt cannot easily be circumvented, particularly when an array of closely spaced micromirrors is the desired product.
Applicants know of only two prior art tilt stage designs which relieve this tilt angle limitation. Both are limited in mechanical generality and in range of application.
First to be developed was a tilt stage with an eccentrically placed flexible pivot, as shown in
FIG. 4
a
and
4
b.
This tilt stage is rather similar to that of
FIG. 1
, having a micromirror
41
attached to a base
40
by a flexible pivot
42
, and a capacitor plate
43
to drive motion of the tilt stage when an appropriate potential difference is applied. However, rather than the centrally located flexible pivot of
FIG. 1
, this flexible pivot is offset toward the capacitor plate. As a result, the maximum tilt angle toward the left (
FIG. 4
c
) is increased by the appropriate geometrical factor, which in practice can be as large as 3-5 times.
This increased tilt
DeLuca Jerome
Dodson Brian W.
Ramirez Ramon O.
Sandia Corporation
LandOfFree
Compound floating pivot micromechanisms does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Compound floating pivot micromechanisms, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Compound floating pivot micromechanisms will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2482208