Adhesive bonding and miscellaneous chemical manufacture – Methods – Surface bonding and/or assembly therefor
Reexamination Certificate
2001-11-20
2004-03-23
Johnstone, Adrienne C. (Department: 1733)
Adhesive bonding and miscellaneous chemical manufacture
Methods
Surface bonding and/or assembly therefor
C152S550000, C152S552000, C156S135000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06709540
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates to tires, generally and more specifically, composite ply structures and methods of manufacturing the composite ply structure including at least one primary ply of inextensible radial extending cords, most preferably of fine diameter steel cords primarily for use in passenger pneumatic or light truck tires, including, not limited to, runflat type tires.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The use of radial steel cords in tires is well known in the tire art. Earthmover and commercial truck tires have used steel corded tires for years.
As the use of steel cords is attempted in passenger tires some common problems of how to consistently make a ply turnup of a steel cord reinforced ply must be resolved.
Historically one must first ask the question of whether or not a ply turnup is even needed.
In 1921, Charles Miller in U.S. Pat. No. 1,393,952 taught that plies could be securely anchored to the beads by means of fabric strips having crossed strands relative to the ply cords without any of the plies actually wrapping around the bead core. Miller's tires showed that as few as four plies were possible, a breakthrough for the tires of that era.
In 1942, S. M. Elliott in U.S. Pat. No. 2,430,560 reported that farm tires could be made with greater elastic deformation if the bead wrapping fabric strips did not even contact the body plies. A radical departure from what was otherwise accepted practice.
In 1968, Fred Kovac and Grover Rye of The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company patented a bias tire leaving an outer ply having giant cords of 0.037 inches or greater. This outer ply comprised two parts, a bias body ply and a pair of radial bead plies. The edges of the bead plies overlapped the edges of the body plies and are sandwiched between them. Kovac, et al indicated that the body ply may be of wire and the bead plies may be reinforced with fabric or filament. Kovac pointedly notes that if giant cords are used in the carcass, the plies containing them are so stiff that it is difficult for the tire builder to turn them around the beads. Thus, he recommended that the edges of the stiffer plies stop short of turning under the beads and bead plies of softer fabric are turned under the beads with their edges overlapping the edges of the stiffer plies.
Powers, et al of The Firestone Tire & Rubber Company taught a radial ply pneumatic tire having one or more body plies containing radially directed inextensible cords with the ply ends terminating on the same side of the bead bundle as the ply. The tire further had a bead connector ply containing radial, inextensible reinforcing cords which is wrapped about the bead bundle. Powers, et al noted that a prior art British Patent No. 990,524 disclosed a radial ply body and a radial ply bead wrap, the cords of the body ply being rayon cords and the bead wrap being steel cord reinforced. Powers noted that the differences in modulus resulted in the cords not acting together as if they were one ply, whereas his all-inextensible cord design did act as one ply. Powers taught that the body ply and the bead connecting ply, where they are contiguous to one another, must be at least 20% and not greater than 50% of the peripheral distance of the body ply as measured from the midpoint of the bead bundle along the body ply to the point on the body ply where the edges of the tread ply are located. Powers suggest glass, steel or Kevlar™ cords could be used. The Powers, et al test tire was a 11-22.5 truck tire employing 1×4+6×4×0.175+1×0.15 radial cords of steel wire of a cable construction having 14 ends per inch. Similarly, the bead connector used the same steel wire construction. These truck tires carry a high operating inflation pressure of about 100 psi and the Powers et al patent demonstrated a potentially feasible concept although no known commercialization of such a truck tire had occurred.
In 1995, Ahmad, et al disclosed a pneumatic tire having a discontinuous outer carcass ply. Ahmad, et al disclosed a full radially inner ply with a conventional turnup end and a discontinuous outer carcass ply that extended from under the belt edges to the bead, the outer ply being contiguously in contact with the outer ply.
EPO Publication 822195A2 discloses a Runflat Tire and Method which shows a runflat tire having multiple radial plies wherein at least one ply is wrapped about the bead and has a turnup, the remaining plies simply terminate near the bead. The bead area concept appears similar to the prior art solutions disclosed in Ahmad with the exception that the plies are spaced by fillers or inserts, a common feature of runflat tires.
In patent publication WO98/54008 a composite ply structure comprising the features of the preamble of claim
1
is disclosed and is considered to be the most relevant state of the art.
In U.S. Pat. No. 2,625,981, issued on Jan. 20, 1953, to E. H. Wallace, a method of making a pneumatic tire containing stranded reinforcing elements has the steps of anchoring firmly the reinforcing elements and stretching the elements and maintaining them in a stretched condition while completing the vulcanization of the tire.
The present invention provides a novel way of creating a composite ply structure in a tire. The tire can be a radial ply pneumatic tire including the type known as runflat tires.
REFERENCES:
patent: 1320121 (1919-10-01), Brucker
patent: 1667009 (1928-04-01), Matthias
patent: 2382177 (1945-08-01), Schanz
patent: 2393541 (1946-01-01), Kohler
patent: 2545370 (1951-03-01), Mittelmann
patent: 2625981 (1953-01-01), Wallace
patent: 2649134 (1953-08-01), Steinle
patent: 3386486 (1968-06-01), Kovac et al.
patent: 4684421 (1987-08-01), Tate
patent: 4904319 (1990-02-01), Divincenzo et al.
patent: 5328532 (1994-07-01), Azuma et al.
patent: 5645674 (1997-07-01), Bohm et al.
patent: 5762740 (1998-06-01), Benzing, II et al.
patent: 0604984 (1994-07-01), None
patent: 2154597 (1973-05-01), None
patent: 1244050 (1971-08-01), None
patent: 9854008 (1998-12-01), None
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol 016, no 494 (M-1324), Oct. 13, 1992 & JP 04 182119 A (Yokohama Rubber Co Ltd), Jun. 29, 1992 abstract; figures 1,2.
Patent Abstracts of Japan, vol 1998, no 10, Aug. 31, 1998 & JP 10 128764 A (Sumitomo Rubber Ind Ltd), May 19, 1998 abstract; figures 1,2.
D'Sidocky Richard Michael
Oare Thomas Reed
Reese David Thomas
Johnstone Adrienne C.
King David L.
Krawczyk Nancy T.
The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
LandOfFree
Composite ply structure for tires and method of manufacture does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Composite ply structure for tires and method of manufacture, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Composite ply structure for tires and method of manufacture will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3229641