Stock material or miscellaneous articles – Hollow or container type article – Glass – ceramic – or sintered – fused – fired – or calcined metal...
Reexamination Certificate
1997-05-29
2002-01-22
Dye, Rena L. (Department: 1772)
Stock material or miscellaneous articles
Hollow or container type article
Glass, ceramic, or sintered, fused, fired, or calcined metal...
C428S036100, C428S036910, C156S156000, C156S188000, C156S189000, C156S245000, C156S293000, C264S221000, C264S258000, C264S512000, C264S523000, C264S546000, C264S552000, C280S281100, C280S288300
Reexamination Certificate
active
06340509
ABSTRACT:
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT
(Not applicable)
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to bicycle frames. It is particularly related to light weight, very strong bicycle frames made of composite materials.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Discussion of Prior Art.
Traditional Metal Bicycle Frame
Bicycle frames have traditionally been constructed of assembled metal tubes. A variety of methods have been used to connect the metal tubes. The most common methods have included welding, soldering or brazing. It has also been common to use preformed metal lugs as connectors at the junctions of the metal tubes. The preformed lugs reinforce, or add strength and stiffness to the welded, soldered, or brazed joint.
Bicycle Frames Utilizing Advanced Composite Tubes
Some modern bicycle frames utilize composite materials to increase the strength and stiffness of the frames, while reducing frame weight, relative to traditional metal frames. Composite materials have a lower density, higher specific strength and stiffness, and better damping qualities than traditionally used metals. The most common method of joining composite tubes to each other has been to use metal lugs at the joints and bonding of the composite tubes to the metal lugs. The metal lugs generally weigh more than the composite tubes to which they are bonded. If the metal lugs are reduced in size to reduce weight there must be a corresponding reduction in size of the composite tubes, with corresponding loss of strength of the frame. Since weight reduction and strength are of primary importance, the use of a combination of composite tubes metal lugs has not been entirely satisfactory.
Previous Jointed All Composite Frames
Several methods have been developed to produce an all-composite bicycle frame. One typical method involves secondarily joining precured composite tubes to each other in the desired frame configuration. Composite tubes are joined to each other by first cutting the tubes, trimming or mitering the tube ends and wrapping uncured composite materials around and between the ends and formed cuts of the tubes to be connected and then curing the composite materials, in place, to form a connection between the tubes. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,188,384 to van Raimdonck, 5,106,682 and 5,116,071 to Caffee, 4,900,048 to Derjinsky, and 5,019,312 to Bishop. The connection between composite tubes are generally solid and the resultant frame is not hollow throughout. The uncured composite material used becomes a reinforcing material laid over and placed into and between the tube members. Parasitic material, which is generally unreinforced resin containing no fillers to control its viscosity and to reduce its density, is also used to insure acceptable cosmetic appearance of the assembled frames. The parasitic material is used to fill gaps and voids and then must be smoothed to give a desirable appearance to the frame. Frames made according to these known processes are not generally amenable to mass production, primarily due to the amount of manual labor required at each stage of the manufacturing process. Consequently, the frames are not commercially viable.
Another method for forming an all composite jointed frame uses lugs formed of composite materials using a bladder. In this method, disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,624,519 to Nelson et al., bicycle lugs are formed by inserting preforms of stacked resin impregnated carbon fiber plies into respective halves of female tooling. A bladder is then placed over one of the preforms and the mold is closed. The bladder is then inflated to press the preforms against the tooling, and the mold heated to cure the resin to form the final cured lug. The preforms are sized so that each forms one half of the lug plus an overlapping portion that forms a lap edge. Accordingly, lugs manufactured by this process have dividing lines of overlapping cured composites. These dividing lines of overlapping composites provide weakness areas in the lugs and undesirable increased weight.
Trend Towards Elimination of Joints in All-Composite Frames
The joints in bicycle frames greatly influence the design, construction and performance of the frames. Joints between frame members are the most frequent source of structural problems occurring in bicycle frames. This is because internal structural loads are generally the greatest at the joints, and because it is difficult to bond the different materials at the joints. As a result, a number of proposals have been made to eliminate or greatly reduce the number of joints in the frames, through the greater use of composite materials. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,271,784 to Chen et al., 3,375,024 to Bowden, 3,833,242 to Thompson, 4,015,854 to Ramond, 4,230,332 to Porsche, 4,493,749 to Brezina, and 4,986,949 to Trimble.
Jointless All-Composite Bicycle Frames
High performance composite materials, such as carbon fiber with epoxy resin, have allowed the development of high performance bicycle frames made without any joints, or a reduced number of joints. In U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,828,781 to Duplesis, 5,544,907 to Lin et al. 5,368,804 to Hwang et al., 5,273,303 to Hornzee-Jones, and 4,986,949 to Trimble are disclosed methods for forming bicycle frames from carbon fiber/carbon composite materials without any joints, or a reduced number of joints. While these frames are successful to the large extent, there are many practical concerns, and manufacturing problems relating to the complexity of forming the entire bicycle frame in one step. In addition, the frames have a lapped construction, i.e., wherein two halves of overlapping materials form a lapped joint.
Three Dimensional vs. Two Dimensional
In the prior-art, parts that are simple three-dimensional shapes, often referred to as “two-dimensional” because they can be defined by a two-dimensional plane rotated about an axis, such as tubes, or a two dimensional shaped traveled along a line, such as rectilinear solid have been made. As illustrated, for example in the U.S. Pat. 4,828,781, tubes in particular have been made without seams by various processes by wrapping resin impregnated fiber into tubes and curing the tubes under pressure applied externally or by an internal bladder. However, complex three-dimensional shapes, such as lugs, one piece frames, or other large frame sections, have been formed by overlapping fiber preforms to form a lapped joint because the methods for forming tubes and the like cannot be applied to complex three-dimensional shapes. This lapped joint not only introduces a potential weakness to the part, but requires additional material for the lap. In addition, this lap construction method may require additional reinforcing material in the lap area, which adds more weight to the final part.
Another problem with prior-art methods for forming complex three-dimensional parts is that a preform for each mold half must be dimensioned specifically to fit into the part cavity. This requires that each preform must be a large flat piece that when pressed into the mold cavity must distort and is likely to fold. These folds are a source of weakness and cracks in the final part and can lead to failure of the part. The folds can also result in resin pockets, pin-holes, and other visual and structural defects. The constraint to shape the preform for the mold also limits the possibility of designing the preforms specifically for performance and strength.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
It is a principal object of the present invention to provide an all composite bicycle frame, wherein the entire frame or three dimensional components of the frame are lapless, thus avoiding the extra weight and strength reduction inherent in lapped construction.
It is another object of the invention to provide an all composite frame that has a low frame weight and high frame strength and stiffness.
Another object of the invention is to provide a method of producing a composite bicycle frame that includes making strong, hollow connector lugs suitable for interconnection of composite tubes.
Another object of the invention is to provide a lap
Clark Paul Nordstrom
Loughry Gregory Joseph
Milovich Dimitrije
Nelson Ronald H.
Dye Rena L.
Radius Engineering, Inc.
Sonntag James Lawrence
LandOfFree
Composite bicycle frame and method of construction thereof does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Composite bicycle frame and method of construction thereof, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Composite bicycle frame and method of construction thereof will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2841151