Compliant backer bar

Electrophotography – Image formation – Photoconductive member

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

06751429

ABSTRACT:

Generally, the process of electrophotographic printing includes charging a photoconductive member to a substantially uniform potential to sensitize the surface thereof. The charged portion of the photoconductive surface is exposed to a light image from either a scanning laser beam, an LED source, or an original document being reproduced. This records an electrostatic latent image on the photoconductive surface. After the electrostatic latent image is recorded on the photoconductive surface, the latent image is developed. Two-component and single-component developer materials are commonly used for development. A typical two-component developer comprises magnetic carrier granules having toner particles adhering triboelectrically thereto. A single-component developer material typically comprises toner particles. Toner particles are attracted to the latent image, forming a toner powder image on the photoconductive surface. The toner powder image is subsequently transferred to a copy sheet. Finally, the toner powder image is heated to permanently fuse it to the copy sheet in image configuration.
The electrophotographic marking process given above can be modified to produce color images. One color electrophotographic marking process, called image-on-image (IOI) processing, superimposes toner powder images of different color toners onto the photoreceptor before the transfer of the composite toner powder image onto the substrate. While the IOI process provides certain benefits, such as a compact architecture, there are several challenges to its successful implementation. For instance, the viability of printing system concepts, such as IOI processing, requires development systems that do not interact with a previously toned image. Since several known development systems, such as conventional magnetic brush development and jumping single-component development, interact with the image on the receiver, a previously toned image will be scavenged by subsequent development if interacting development systems are used. Thus, for the IOI process, there is a need for scavengeless or noninteractive development systems.
Hybrid scavengeless development technology develops toner via a conventional magnetic brush onto the surface of a donor roll and a plurality of electrode wires are closely spaced from the toned donor roll in the development zone. An AC voltage is applied to the wires to generate a toner cloud in the development zone. This donor roll generally consists of a conductive core covered with a thin (50-200 &mgr;m) partially conductive layer. The magnetic brush roll is held at an electrical potential difference relative to the donor core to produce the field necessary for toner development. The toner layer on the donor roll is then disturbed by electric fields from a wire or set of wires to produce and sustain an agitaied cloud of toner particles. Typical AC voltages of the wires relative to the donor are 700-900 Volts peak to peak at frequencies of 5-15 kHz. These AC signals are often square waves, rather than pure sinusoidal waves. Toner from the cloud is then developed onto the nearby photoreceptor by fields created by a latent image.
Maintaining the proper distance between the developer units and the photoreceptor is an important task. The developer rolls must be in close enough proximity to the belt so that toner particles leave the roll and adhere to the belt and at the same time, cannot contact the belt and thereby disrupt toner already placed upon the belt.
Embodiments include a backer bar assembly for supporting a photoreceptor belt, including a substantially rigid first backer bar having first and second ends and a second developer backer bar having first and second ends. The first and second ends of the first backer bar are substantially fixed, the first end of the lower developer backer bar is substantially fixed, and the second end of the lower developer backer bar is free to travel a short distance in response to an externally applied force.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4398496 (1983-08-01), Kopko
patent: 4537494 (1985-08-01), Lubinsky et al.
patent: 4769671 (1988-09-01), Koff
patent: 4806991 (1989-02-01), Guslits
patent: 5032872 (1991-07-01), Folkins et al.
patent: 5168318 (1992-12-01), Haneda et al.
patent: 5600418 (1997-02-01), Hart et al.
patent: 5669049 (1997-09-01), Palumbo et al.
patent: 5953565 (1999-09-01), Fiore et al.
patent: 6032014 (2000-02-01), Janssens et al.
patent: 6035161 (2000-03-01), Fiore et al.
patent: 6430387 (2002-08-01), Quesnel et al.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Compliant backer bar does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Compliant backer bar, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Compliant backer bar will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3340786

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.