Complexity determining apparatus

Pulse or digital communications – Testing

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

348180, 348404, H04B 346

Patent

active

059334509

DESCRIPTION:

BRIEF SUMMARY
The present application relates to apparatus for determining the complexity of a data signal using forward analysis.


BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

It is sometimes useful to have an indication of the complexity of a data signal. For example, it has been proposed to multiplex a plurality of coded video signals, each encoded using a constant bit rate (CBR) encoder. The bit rate allocated to each of the CBR encoders is dynamically varied, based on both the complexity of the video signal being encoded, and the combined complexities of all of the video signals being multiplexed. In such a system, video signals having relatively high complexity are allocated a higher bit rate than those having relatively low complexity.
In another example, the CBR encoders, themselves, maintain their allocated constant bit rate by varying the quantizing step size (or the number of quantizing steps) used to encode the video signal. Using a smaller quantizing step size (or more quantizing steps) requires more bits to encode them; and conversely using a larger quantizing step size requires fewer bits. The quantizing step size is generally varied in response to the current instantaneous bit rate to maintain the overall predetermined constant bit rate.
In both of the above examples, it is desirable to have a complexity representative signal for each video signal being multiplexed. In the multiplexing example, the bit rates allocated to the CBR encoders encoding the video signals are adjusted, based on these complexity signals. In the CBR encoder example, the quantizing step size may be set based on the complexity of the signal being encoded, in addition to the current instantaneous bit rate.
One known measure of the complexity of a video signal is the number of bits necessary to encode that video signal using a variable bit rate (VBR) encoder: more bits indicate higher complexity, and conversely, fewer bits indicate lower complexity. Such a complexity measure can be generated in advance, or in parallel with other processing, a process termed forward analysis. The complexity measure, thus derived, may by used to control processing of that video signal by subsequent processing circuitry, such as a CBR encoder, or multiplexing system. A VBR encoder is a complex electronic system, however, and including a VBR encoder for each signal to be multiplexed in a multiplexer system, to determine the complexity of that signal, is expensive and results in lowered reliability due to the added complex circuitry.
Another proposed method for measuring the complexity of a video signal being encoded by a CBR encoder uses parameters generated during the CBR encoding process. Specifically, the product of the average quantizing step size for a predetermined time period of the video signal times the number of bits generated from encoding the video signal during that period has been found to vary with the complexity of the video signal being encoded, while being independent of the predetermined constant bit rate being produced by the CBR encoder. This measure, however, is produced during the encoding process, and is not available until after the picture or frame has been encoded, a process termed backward analysis. While this measure may be used as an estimate of the complexity of succeeding frames, it cannot be used by the CBR encoder itself to determine the necessary quantizing step size. It can also lead to inaccurate operation of the multiplexing system if a sudden change in complexity occurs, in particular, from a relatively simple image to a relatively complex one.
It is desirable to produce a measure of the complexity of a data signal that is available to the processing system simultaneously with the processing of the data signal itself, but does not require a very complex electronic system to produce the complexity measure.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The inventors have realized that the complexity of a video signal will also be accurately reflected in a video signal corresponding to the original video signal, but having a lower spatial and/or

REFERENCES:
patent: 4394774 (1983-07-01), Widergren et al.
patent: 4862264 (1989-08-01), Wells et al.
patent: 4890162 (1989-12-01), McNeely et al.
patent: 5113242 (1992-05-01), Tsinberg et al.
patent: 5115309 (1992-05-01), Hang
patent: 5121216 (1992-06-01), Chen et al.
patent: 5138440 (1992-08-01), Radice
patent: 5144424 (1992-09-01), Savatier
patent: 5231494 (1993-07-01), Wachob
patent: 5241401 (1993-08-01), Fujiwara et al.
patent: 5263100 (1993-11-01), Kim et al.
patent: 5291282 (1994-03-01), Nakagawa et al.
patent: 5301242 (1994-04-01), Gonzales et al.
patent: 5490130 (1996-02-01), Akagiri
patent: 5592226 (1997-01-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5617145 (1997-04-01), Huang et al.
Haskell, "Buffer and Channel Sharing by Several Interframe Picturephone Coders", The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 51, Jan. 1972, pp. 261-289.
Kishino et al., "Variable Bit-Rate coding of Video Signals for ATM Networks", IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, vol. 7, No. 5, Jun. 1989, pp. 801-806.
Zdepski et al. "Statistically Based Buffer Control Policies for Constant Rate Transmission of Compressed Digital Video", IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 39, No. 6, Jun. 1991, pp. 947-957.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Complexity determining apparatus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Complexity determining apparatus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Complexity determining apparatus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-856386

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.