Data processing: artificial intelligence – Neural network – Learning task
Reexamination Certificate
2006-03-30
2010-02-23
Smith, Creighton (Department: 2614)
Data processing: artificial intelligence
Neural network
Learning task
C706S021000, C706S015000, C706S012000
Reexamination Certificate
active
07668789
ABSTRACT:
A first distribution of cases over a first group of categories is received. A categorizer trained using a search-and-confirm technique classifies the cases into a second group of categories. A second distribution of the cases over the second group of categories is generated using results of the classifying. The first and second distributions are compared to identify differences between the first and second distributions.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5819258 (1998-10-01), Vaithyanathan et al.
patent: 5903884 (1999-05-01), Lyon et al.
patent: 5943670 (1999-08-01), Prager
patent: 6003027 (1999-12-01), Prager
patent: 6038560 (2000-03-01), Wical
patent: 6418434 (2002-07-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 6675161 (2004-01-01), Suchter
patent: 6701333 (2004-03-01), Suermondt et al.
patent: 6704905 (2004-03-01), Fukushige et al.
patent: 6728690 (2004-04-01), Meek et al.
patent: 6823323 (2004-11-01), Forman et al.
patent: 6842751 (2005-01-01), Vilalta et al.
patent: 6925454 (2005-08-01), Lam et al.
patent: 6944616 (2005-09-01), Ferguson et al.
patent: 6973452 (2005-12-01), Metzger et al.
patent: 7043492 (2006-05-01), Neal et al.
patent: 7113957 (2006-09-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 7177855 (2007-02-01), Witkowski et al.
patent: 7184602 (2007-02-01), Cohen et al.
patent: 7349917 (2008-03-01), Forman et al.
patent: 7406452 (2008-07-01), Forman et al.
patent: 7437338 (2008-10-01), Forman et al.
patent: 7467079 (2008-12-01), Morimoto et al.
patent: 2003/0187809 (2003-10-01), Suermondt et al.
patent: 2005/0096866 (2005-05-01), Shan et al.
patent: 2006/0173559 (2006-08-01), Kirshenbaum et al.
patent: 2007/0185901 (2007-08-01), Gates
patent: 0747848 (1996-12-01), None
G. Forman, U.S. Appl. No. 10/902,924, entitled “System and Method for Category Discovery,” filed Jul. 30, 2004, pp. 1-38, Figs. 1-7D.
Forman et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/080,098, entitled “A Method of, and System for, Classification Count Adjustment,” filed Mar. 14, 2005, pp. 1-31, Figs. 1A-5.
Kirshenbaum et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/118,178, entitled “Providing Training Information for Training a Categorizer,” filed Apr. 29, 2005, pp. 1-39, Figs. 1-3E.
Kirshenbaum et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/118,786, entitled “Computing a Quantification Measure Associated with Cases in a Category,” filed Apr. 29, 2005, pp. 1-35, Figs. 1-3D.
Kirshenbaum et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/172,187, entitled “Effecting Action to Address an Issue Associated with a Category Based on Information that Enables Ranking of Categories,” filed Jun. 30, 2005, pp. 1-52, Figs. 1-5H.
Kirshenbaum et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/211,979, entitled “Producing a Measure Regarding Cases Associated with an Issue After One or More Events Have Occured,” filed Aug. 25, 2005, pp. 1-51, Figs. 1-5H.
Forman et al., U.S. Appl. No. 11/364,108, entitled “Identifying an Emerging or New Category,” filed Feb. 28, 2006, pp. 1-34, Figs. 1-6.
Shan, U.S. Appl. No. 11/117,989, entitled “Performing Quality Determination of Data,” filed Apr. 29, 2005, pp. 1-32, Figs. 1-9.
Shan, U.S. Appl. No. 11/118,832, entitled “Determining a Time Point Corresponding to a Change in Data Values Based on Fitting with Respect to Plural Aggregate Value Sets,” filed Apr. 29, 2008, pp. 1-26, Figs. 1-8.
Shan, U.S. Appl. No. 11/119,037, entitled “Detecting Change in Data,” filed Apr. 29, 2005, pp. 1-26, Figs. 1-6.
Office Action dated Jun. 2, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/118,178.
Office Action dated Oct. 16, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/118,178.
Office Action dated Sep. 18, 2007 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/118,786.
Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/386,005, now U.S. Patent No. 7,437,338.
Final Rejection dated Apr. 18, 2008 in U.S. Appl. No. 11/118,786.
Forman George H.
Kirshenbaum Evan R.
Lillibridge Mark D.
Suermondt Henri J.
Hewlett--Packard Development Company, L.P.
Smith Creighton
LandOfFree
Comparing distributions of cases over groups of categories does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Comparing distributions of cases over groups of categories, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparing distributions of cases over groups of categories will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4156079