Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system – Computer graphics processing – Graphic manipulation
Reexamination Certificate
2005-03-08
2010-12-28
Amini, Javid A (Department: 2628)
Computer graphics processing and selective visual display system
Computer graphics processing
Graphic manipulation
Reexamination Certificate
active
07859549
ABSTRACT:
A comparative review system for displaying views associated with studies on first and second display areas according to a screen layout, a study view mode, and a hanging protocol. The screen layout is used to determine the number of display slots to display in the first and second display areas. This determination along with the study view mode is then used to determine whether to display a study in corresponding display slots associated with the first and second display areas. The number of display slots displayed, whether studies are displayed in corresponding display slots across displays, and the hanging protocol are used to determine which views to display within display slots. Each screen layout, study view mode and hanging protocol is associated with a comparative review mode, which in turn are combined into a comparative review sequence. The comparative review sequence allows for display and navigation through the various modes.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5644611 (1997-07-01), McShane et al.
patent: 6895128 (2005-05-01), Bohnenkamp
patent: 2002/0193676 (2002-12-01), Bodicker et al.
patent: 2002/0194019 (2002-12-01), Evertsz
patent: 2003/0071829 (2003-04-01), Bodicker et al.
patent: 2003/0187689 (2003-10-01), Barnes et al.
patent: 2006/0146071 (2006-07-01), Morita et al.
patent: 2006/0242143 (2006-10-01), Esham et al.
patent: 2007/0063998 (2007-03-01), Mahesh
patent: 2007/0197909 (2007-08-01), Kariathungal et al.
patent: 2008/0117230 (2008-05-01), Wegenkittl et al.
patent: 2008/0126982 (2008-05-01), Sadikali et al.
patent: 101 25 504 (2002-12-01), None
patent: 101 32 697 (2005-12-01), None
patent: 1 229 459 (2002-08-01), None
patent: 1424648 (2004-02-01), None
Srinka Ghosh, Katherine P. Andriole and David E. Avrin: “Viewport: An object-oriented Approach to Integrate Workstation Software for Tile and Stack Mode Display” Journal of Digital Imaging, vol. 10, No. 3, Suppl 1 Aug. 1997: pp. 177-179.
Adrian Moise: “Designing better user interfaces for radiology Interpretation PHD Thesis” Aug. 2003, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
Kim Y et al: “Requirements for PACS Workstations” Image Management and Communication (IMAC) in Patent Care: New Technologies for Better Patent Care, Apr. 10, 1991.
PCT International Search Report for PCT/EP20006/050611 dated Mar. 3, 2006.
Preim et al., Integration of Measurement Tools in Medical 3d Visualizations, MeVis—Center for Medical Diagnostic Systems and Visualization, IEEE Visualization, pp. 21 to 28, Boston, Massachusetts, Nov. 1, 2002.
Evertsz et al., Softcopy Reading in Screening Mammography: European Projects SCREEN and SCREEN-TRIAL, Electromedica 70, No. 2, pp. 157 to 164, 2002.
Handley Carrie
Rankin Steve
Scorah Edmund H.
AGFA Inc.
Amini Javid A
Bereskin & Parr LLP
Caulder Isis E.
LandOfFree
Comparative image review system and method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Comparative image review system and method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Comparative image review system and method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4231312