Flexible or portable closure – partition – or panel – Plural strip – slat – or panel type – With mounting or supporting means
Patent
1998-07-02
2000-07-18
Purol, David M.
Flexible or portable closure, partition, or panel
Plural strip, slat, or panel type
With mounting or supporting means
160193, E05D 1538
Patent
active
060893044
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates generally to a counterbalancing system for sectional doors. More particularly, the present invention relates to a counterbalancing system for sectional doors which move in and out of position relative to a vertical opening. More specifically, the present invention relates to a compact counterbalancing system for use in conjunction with multi-section doors which are movable from a horizontal position to a vertical position in proximity to a door frame, particularly in circumstances where there is minimal clearance between a door frame and the overhead or minimal clearance to the side of the door frame.
BACKGROUND ART
Counterbalancing systems for sectional doors have been employed for many years. Common examples of such sectional doors are the type employed as garage doors in homes, commercial and utility buildings, and similar applications. Counterbalancing systems originally solved the need for providing mechanical assistance in the instance of very large doors for commercial installations and smaller garage doors for residential use, which were normally constructed of heavy, relatively thick wood or metal components. More recently, counterbalancing systems have been increasingly used to permit opening and closing operations by a single person and to facilitate the use of electric motors, preferably of limited size, to power the opening and closing of such doors.
Most such counterbalancing systems utilize drums which carry cables attached to the garage door. Commonly the drums are mounted above the frame defining the door opening, with a drum positioned at each end of the door such that the cables may be conveniently connected proximate the lower lateral corners of the garage door. Basically, the door is moved toward the closed position, blocking the door opening due to gravity acting on the door as it moves from a substantially horizontal, open position above and inwardly of the door frame to a closed position. The path of the door in opening and closing is commonly defined by a track arrangement which interacts with rollers attached to the various sections of the door. The cable drums are classically interconnected with springs in a wide variety of ways so that they are progressively loaded as the door is lowered to prevent uncontrolled descent of the door and employ stored energy to assist in raising the door during subsequent opening operation.
The prevailing type of counterbalancing system for garage doors for homes normally having a seven-foot high door involves the utilization of torsion springs mounted on a shaft which is coaxial with or mounts the drums. In such systems, it is established practice to utilize cable drums having a diameter of approximately 31/2 inches to 4 inches. A torsion spring or springs mounted outwardly of the shaft has a diameter normally in excess of 11/2 inches to maintain an appropriate spring index. The drums and spring are normally mounted on a tubular shaft having a diameter of approximately 1 inch, which holds the springs and transmits torque from the springs to the drums which are attached to the tubing.
These conventional torsion counterbalancing systems require that the tube mounting the drums be positioned above the horizontal track of the door to permit raising the door as high in the door opening as possible to accommodate higher vehicles and to otherwise make optimum use of the door opening. With a counterbalancing system thus positioned and employing conventional 31/2 to 4-inch cable drums, there is a requirement that there be a minimum of 13 to 14 inches above the door opening as overhead clearance to permit the mounting of these counterbalancing systems. However, a disadvantage of these conventional systems is the increasing requirement for a counterbalancing system which can be installed in a structure having a lesser overhead clearance. Frequently, construction parameters dictate a lower ceiling within a garage or the use of beams, supports, or other objects which do not provide the necessary headroom cleara
REFERENCES:
patent: 1886490 (1932-11-01), Lynch
patent: 1897391 (1933-02-01), Kelly
patent: 1940485 (1933-12-01), Beeman et al.
patent: 1990870 (1935-02-01), Kelly
patent: 1994142 (1935-03-01), Madsen
patent: 2020831 (1935-11-01), Greegor
patent: 2040080 (1936-05-01), Collins
patent: 2045060 (1936-06-01), Wheatley
patent: 2093019 (1937-09-01), Norberg
patent: 2227571 (1941-01-01), Clark
patent: 2264642 (1941-12-01), Rowe
patent: 2338205 (1944-01-01), Rowe
patent: 2538626 (1951-01-01), Olsen
patent: 2656561 (1953-10-01), McKee
patent: 4119133 (1978-10-01), Wolf
patent: 4878529 (1989-11-01), Hormann
Mullet Willis J.
Paquette Derek S.
Purol David M.
Wayne-Dalton Corp.
LandOfFree
Compact track system with rear mount counterbalance system for s does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Compact track system with rear mount counterbalance system for s, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Compact track system with rear mount counterbalance system for s will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2026274