Combined flue gas desulfurization and carbon dioxide removal...

Chemical apparatus and process disinfecting – deodorizing – preser – Chemical reactor – Waste gas purifier

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C422S168000, C422S169000, C422S170000, C422S171000, C422S198000, C422S198000, C422S236000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06399030

ABSTRACT:

FIELD AND BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to the field of industrial power plant furnace and boiler systems and, in particular, to a new and useful apparatus and method for reducing or removing carbon dioxide (CO
2
) and sulfur oxides (SO
2
and SO
3
) from flue gases exiting such systems.
2. Description of the Related Art
Processes and devices for removing specific contaminant gases such as carbon dioxide or sulfur oxides from power plant systems have generally been known for many years, including open spray towers, packed towers, and tray towers. Known apparatus for separating these gases from the flue gas streams exiting the furnace systems requires first removing the sulfur oxides at a first location and then removing the carbon dioxide gases at a second location. The separation of steps is necessary because of undesirable reactions between the components of the different separation and removal systems.
Commonly, amines such as monoethanolamine (MEA), diethanolamine (DEA), and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) are used to capture carbon dioxide from flue gases exhausting from fossil fuel power systems. Unfortunately, sulfur dioxide (SO
2
) degrades these amines and inhibits the carbon dioxide removal. This is why carbon dioxide and sulfur oxide separation in current systems takes place in two separate steps in two different vessels.
Articles discussing known separation techniques include: Albanese, A. S. and M. Steinberg, “Environmental Control Technology for Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide—Final Report,” Brookhaven National Laboratory Report BNL 51116, UC-11, for US DOE, September 1979; Chadwick, J. L., “Acid Gas Removal,” SRI International Report No. 24 for Energy Technology Economics Program, July 1981; Pauley, C. R., “CO
2
Recovery from Flue Gas,” Chemical Engineering Progress, May 1984; Miller, D. B., T. J. Soychak and D. M. Gosar, “Economics of Recovering CO
2
from Exhaust Gases,” Chemical Engineering Progress, October 1986; Cheng, H. C. and M. Steinberg, “A Study on the Systematic Control of CO
2
Emissions from Fossil Fuel Power Plants in the U.S.,” Environmental Progress, Vol. 5, No. 4, November 1986; Hendriks, C.,
Carbon Dioxide Removal from Coal-Fired Power Plants,
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands 1994; Leci, C. L., “Financial Implications on Power Generation Costs Resulting from the Parasitic Effect of CO
2
Capture Using Liquid Scrubbing Technology from Power Station Flue Gases,” Energy Conversion Management, Vol. 37, Nos. 6-8, 1996; and Herzog, H., E. Drake and E. Adams, “CO
2
Capture, Reuse, and Storage Technologies for Mitigating Global Climate Change,” White Paper Final Report, MIT Energy Laboratory for US DOE, January 1997.
It is clear that there is a need to separate both carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxides from flue gases, as expressed in several of the articles. However, a combined unit which can effectively separate both types of contaminants from flue gas flows has not been available.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a single vessel for capturing both carbon dioxide and sulfur oxides from power plant flue gases.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a separation vessel which combines the two gas separation processes without interference of one process with the other.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a simple, mechanical separator between the gas separation processes within the vessel.
Accordingly, a combined removal system for separating carbon dioxide and sulfur oxide gases from furnace flue gases is provided within a single vessel having two chambers. The chambers are separated by a series of baffles and drains. Additionally, a series of droplet separators, also known as mist eliminators or moisture separators, may be used as a further separation means. The primary chamber contains reagents and a delivery system for removing sulfur oxides (SO
2
and SO
3
) from the flue gases. The secondary chamber has reagents for removing carbon dioxide (CO
2
) from the flue gases. The baffles and drains permit the flue gases to pass from the primary chamber into the secondary chamber, while collecting an amine solution used to trap carbon dioxide. Alternatively, the primary and secondary chambers may be separated by a horizontal segment or a combination of horizontal and vertical sections.
The use of baffle systems for solid particulate removal and collection of condensate from gas flows in various sections of a furnace or boiler is known. However, the present inventor is not aware of baffle systems being used to separate chambers of a single vessel gas separation unit of the type described herein; i.e., a single unit containing means for separating both gases from the flue gas flow.
The various features of novelty which characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed to and forming a part of this disclosure. For a better understanding of the invention, its operating advantages and specific objects attained by its uses, reference is made to the accompanying drawings and descriptive matter in which a preferred embodiment of the invention is illustrated.


REFERENCES:
patent: 3961018 (1976-06-01), Williamson
patent: 4436532 (1984-03-01), Yamaguchi et al.
patent: H1499 (1995-11-01), Vance
patent: 5693297 (1997-12-01), Turner et al.
patent: 5724805 (1998-03-01), Golomb et al.
“Environmental Control Technology for Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide—Final Report,” A.S. Albanese and M. Steinberg, Brookhaven National Laboratory Report BNL 51116, UC-11, for the U.S. Department of Energy, Sep. 1979, pp. iii,iv,v, and 1-51.
Acid Gas Removal: J.L. Chadwick et al., SRI International Report No. 24 for the Energy Technology Economics Program (ETEP), Jul. 1981, pp. 21-29 and 37.
“CO2Recovery from Flue Gas,” C.R. Pauley,Chemical Engineering Progress,May 1984, pp. 59-62.
“Economics of Recovering CO2from Exhaust Gases,” D.B. Miller, T.J. Soychak, and D.M. Gosar,Chemical Engineering Progress,Oct. 1986, pp. 38-46.
“A Study on the Systematic Control of CO2Emissions from Fossil Fuel Power Plants in the U.S.,” H.C. Cheng and M. Steinberg,Environmental Progress,5(4), pp. 245-255, (1986).
Carbon Dioxide Removal from Coal-fired Power Plants,C. Hendriks, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1994, pp. 19-49.
Financial Implications on Power Generation Costs Resulting from the Parasitic Effect of CO2Capture Using Liquid Scrubbing Technology from Power Station Flue Gases, C.L. Leci,Energy Conversion Management,37 (6-8), pp. 915-921, (1996).
“CO2Capture, Reuse, and Storage Technologies for Mitigating Global Climate Change”, H. Herzog, E. Drake, and E. Adams, A White Paper Final Report from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Energy Laboratory for the U.S. Department of Energy, Jan., 1997.
KRC Umwelttechnik brochure, “Flue Gas Desulfurization” believed to be circa mid 1980's , by KRC Umwelttechnik GmbH, Germany, 4 pages, illustrates “separating bowl” concept used to separate FGD scrubber slurries at differing pH.
KRC Umwelttechnik brochure, “Desulfurization, Denitrification, Disposal”, date unknown, by KRC Umwelttechnik GmbH, Germany, 5 pages, illustrates “separating bowl” concept used to separate FGD scrubber slurries at differing pH.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Combined flue gas desulfurization and carbon dioxide removal... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Combined flue gas desulfurization and carbon dioxide removal..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Combined flue gas desulfurization and carbon dioxide removal... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2901468

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.