Optical: systems and elements – Collimating of light beam
Reexamination Certificate
2001-02-21
2002-09-17
Schwartz, Jordan M. (Department: 2873)
Optical: systems and elements
Collimating of light beam
C359S642000, C359S708000, C359S712000, C385S033000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06452726
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF INVENTION
This invention generally relates to solid immersion lenses and collimators using such solid immersion lenses.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In many optical systems and applications, such as near-field microscopy, imaging, photolithography and optical storage it is important to reduce the spot size and thus obtain higher definition or resolution. The spot size of an optical system, e.g., an optical storage system, is commonly defined as the distance between half power points. This distance is determined by diffraction to be approximately &lgr;/(2·NA), where &lgr; is the free space wavelength of the light used and NA is the numerical aperture of the objective lens focusing the light beam. NA is defined as NA=nsin(&thgr;), where &thgr; is the half cone angle of the focused light rays and n is the index of refraction of the medium in which &thgr; is measured.
One way to improve the definition is to work at shorter wavelengths &lgr;, e.g., in the green or blue range, and to increase the numerical aperture to be as close to one as possible. A further possibility is to employ near-field optics in the manner described by Betzig et al. in
Applied Physics Letters,
Vol. 62, pp. 142 (1992), using a tapered fiber with a metal film with a small pinhole at the end. The definition of the system is determined by the size of the pinhole, and can be 50 nm or less. The advantages of the fiber probe system are its excellent definition and its polarization preserving capability which is particularly useful in magneto-optic storage applications. The disadvantages of the system are its poor light efficiency and the fact that it can only observe a single spot at a time, thus limiting its tracking ability when used for optical storage.
Another alternative is to use a solid immersion lens (SIL) between the objective lens and the illuminated object, e.g., an optical recording medium or sample under investigation. The SIL is placed within a wavelength &lgr; or less (in the near-field) of the object. Optical systems taking advantage of appropriate SILs are described, e.g., by S. M. Mansfield et al. “Solid Immersion Microscope”, Applied Physics Letters, Vol. 57, pp. 2615-6 (1990); S. M. Mansfield et al. “High Numerical Aperture Lens System for Optical Storage”, Optics Letters, Vol. 18, pp. 305-7 (1993) and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,004,307 issued to G. S. Kino et al. In this patent Kino et al. teach the use of a high refractive index SIL having a spherical surface facing the objective lens and a flat front surface facing an object to be examined. The use of this SIL enables one to go beyond the Rayleigh diffraction limit in air. In one embodiment, the SIL is employed in a near-field application in a reflection optical microscope to increase the resolution of the microscope by the factor of 1
, where n is the index of refraction of the SIL.
A paper by G. S. Kino presented at the SPIE Conference on Far- and Near-Field Optics, “Fields Associated with the Solid Immersion Lens”, SPIE, Vol. 3467, pp. 128-37 (1998) describes in more detail the principles of operation of two particular SILs. The first is a hemispherical SIL and the second is a supersphere SIL or a stigmatic SIL. The hemispherical SIL improves the effective NA of the objective lens by the refractive index n of the SIL and decreases the spot size by 1
. The supersphere SIL increases the effective NA of the objective lens by the square of the refractive index n
2
and obtains a focus at a distance a
from the center of the supersphere, where a is the sphere's radius. The spot size is reduced by a factor of n
2
. The performance characteristics and theoretical limitations of both types of SILs are also discussed.
SILs have found multiple applications. For example, Corle et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,125,750 teach the use of a SIL in an optical recording system to reduce the spot size in an optical recording medium. These SILs typically have a spherical surface facing the objective lens and a flat surface facing an optical recording medium. The flat surface is in close proximity to the medium.
In U.S. Pat. No. 5,497,359 Mamin et al. teach the use of a superhemisphere SIL in a radiation-transparent air bearing slider employed in an optical disk data storage system. Lee et al. in U.S. Pat. No. 5,729,393 also teach an optical storage system utilizing a flying head using a SIL with a raised central surface facing the medium. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,881,042 Knight teaches a flying head with a SIL partially mounted on a slider in an optical recording system. This slider incorporates the objective lens and it can be used in a magneto-optic storage system. Finally, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,883,872 Kino teaches the use of a SIL with a mask having a slit for further reducing the spot size and thus increasing the optical recording density in an optical storage system, e.g., a magneto-optic storage system.
The prior art SILs as well as the optical systems using them have a number of shortcomings. Hemispherical SILs suffer from back reflection problems. These degrade system performance, especially when the light source is a laser, e.g., a laser diode, and the back reflection is coupled back into the laser. Also, the ray reflected from the spherical surface and the ray reflected from the flat surface or from an object just below the flat surface are coincident. This gives rise to undesirable interference effects.
Superhemispherical SILs have reduced back reflection. However, they demagnify the image of the object by a larger factor than hemispherical SILs. For example, the demagnification of superhemispherical SILs in the axial direction is 1
3
. Because of this, the length tolerance for the superhemispherical SIL is very tight. Both the hemispherical and superhemispherical SILs increase the effective NA (NA
eff
) of the objective lens (for hemispherical SIL NA
eff
=NA
objective
·n; and for superhemispherical SIL NA
eff
=NA
objective
·n
2
). The maximum NA
eff
that can be obtained by either type of SIL is NA
eff
=n.
Hemispherical, superhemispherical and related SILs experience alignment problems because optical systems employing them require the use of a separate objective lens. This separate lens has to be accurately aligned with the SIL. In many optical systems alignment between these two lenses cannot be easily preserved due to external influences (vibrations, stresses, thermal effects etc.). In addition, in systems where the number of parts is to be small, e.g., for weight and size reasons the objective lens is cumbersome.
Also it is well known in the art that a plurality of lenses (or micro-lenses) can be fabricated within a monolithic body in an ordered arrangement to comprise a lens array (or micro-lens array). Such lens arrays may be formed by processes that include photolithography, etching, ion milling, reflowed photoresist methods, molding, and thermal bonding methods as described in Optics & Photonics News, Sep. 1999, pp. 19-22, and in “Microoptics”, by Stefan Sinzinger and Jurgen Jaohns, Wiley-VCH, 1999. Unfortunately, the arrays disclosed in the prior art do not effectively overcome the difficulties associated with attaching multiple waveguides to a monolithic body in precise alignment with the corresponding lenses.
In addition, there is a need in the industry to develop effective, light-weight and easy to use collimators for waveguides such as optical fibers. The fusing of lenses, e.g., graded index lenses (GRINs), to the ends of fibers is known and described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 4,737,006 to Warbrick, U.S. Pat. No. 4,962,988 to Swann and U.S. Pat. No. 6,033,515 to Walters et al. These patents also teach techniques for performing fusion splicing of a lens to the fiber. Additional fusion splicing techniques are described, e.g., in U.S. Pat. No. 5,299,274 to Wysocki et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,745,311 to Fukuoka et al. These and other prior art fusion spliced parts and splicers attempt to overcome alignment problems encountered in these techniques.
Unfortunately, prior art SILs require additional objective lenses, a
Lumen Intellectual Property Services Inc.
Schwartz Jordan M.
LandOfFree
Collimators and collimator arrays employing ellipsoidal... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Collimators and collimator arrays employing ellipsoidal..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Collimators and collimator arrays employing ellipsoidal... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2893095