Coding apparatus and coding method

Dynamic magnetic information storage or retrieval – General processing of a digital signal – In specific code or form

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C360S046000, C341S050000, C341S059000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06335841

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is related to an apparatus for coding data to record coded data on a recording/reproducing apparatus for reproducing and decoding the recorded data. More specifically, the present invention is directed to a method for coding and decoding data.
To understand the present invention, the conventional technique will be briefly explained. The conventional technique involves explanations about the Viterbi algorithm and trellis representation, the partial response channel, and the error correction.
The Viterbi algorithm is to determine a most likelihood path along branches of a trellis diagram. The respective branches of the trellis diagram are weighted with respect to the values of input signals. The Viterbi algorithm may determine such a path for constituting the most likelihood degree based upon the accumulated value of these weighted values.
A so-called “PRML (Partial Response Maximum Likelihood) system” is widely used in magnetic recording/reproducing apparatuses. In this PRML system, the partial response (PR) channel is combined with this Viterbi algorithm. A system polynomial known as the partial response class 4 (PR4) is expressed by G
(D)
=(1−D)(1+D), assuming now that symbol “D” is a delay operator. Furthermore, with respect to high density recording operations, it is known that the extended partial response class 4 (EPR4), the extended EPR4 of G
(D)
=(1−D)(1+D)
3
, and the MEEPR4 (Modified Extended EPR4) of G
(D)=(
1−D
2
)(5+4D+2D
2
) are suitably employed. The extended partial response class 4 is expressed by a higher-order of G
(D)
=(1−D)(1+D)
2
.
As the system capable of suppressing an occurrence of such an error, and the method for improving the decoding performance, the following idea is conceivable. In this decoding performance improving method, the errors which occur at the same time are locally corrected. That is, as described in the publication entitled “A New Target Response with Parity Coding for High Density Magnetic Recording Channels” written by Thomas Conway (IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 34, No. 4, July 1998), the parity bit is added to the code word when the data is recorded, whereas the error detection/correction are carried out when the data is read. For example, the minimum distance decoding error in the extended EPR4ML is the 3-bit continuous error. Such an odd-numbered bit error can be detected during the reproducing operation by adding a 1-bit parity bit thereto.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In the above-described EEPR4ML made by combining the EEPR4 channel with the Viterbi decoding circuit, and MEEPR4ML made by combining the MEEPR4 with the Viterbi decoding circuit, both the Euclid distance between the correct information series and the erroneous information series, and also the error events at this time are express as follows:
EEPR4ML:
(1) error event of distance
6
±(+−+)
(2) error event of distance
8
±(+−+−. . . )(length is longer than, or equal to 4)
±(+−+
00
+−+)
(3) error event of distance
10
±(+)
(4) error event of distance
12
±(+−)
MEEPRML:
(1) error event of distance
48
±(+−+)
(2) error event of distance
68
±(+−+−. . . ) (length is longer than, or equal to 4)
(3) error event of distance
70
±(+)
(4) error event of distance
76
±(+−+
000
+−+)
In any case, the minimum distance decoding error is the 3-bit error, and this 3-bit error can be detected by employing such a parity code by which the odd-numbered bit error can be detected. However, as to the more than 4-bit continuous errors corresponding to the subsequent event errors having the short distances, the odd-numbered bit continuous bit errors contained therein cannot be detected. There is another problem that also as to the detectable odd-numbered bit error, the circuit required to specify this bit length during the error correction becomes complex.
As a consequence, an object of the present invention is to reduce an occurrence of such an error event which cannot be detected while an error is corrected.
To solve the above-described problems, a coding method according to the present invention is featured by that while a parity bit capable of detecting an error during reproducing operation is generated, a coding operation is carried out in such a manner that a specific pattern is not contained in a code word series to which this parity bit is added. At the same time, a coding apparatus of the present invention is arranged by that while a most likelihood path is searched based upon the Viterbi algorithm, such a transition path is not selected during the path searching stage. This transition path corresponds to a specific pattern which has been removed from the code word series by the coding operation. As a consequence, for example, if the specific pattern corresponds to “1111”, then it is possible to avoid an occurrence of more than 4-bit continuous errors in the decoding errors. Since this coding arrangement is combined with the error detection/correction, the decoding characteristic can be improved.


REFERENCES:
patent: 6081210 (2000-06-01), Nikolic et al.
patent: 6130629 (2000-10-01), Aziz et al.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Coding apparatus and coding method does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Coding apparatus and coding method, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Coding apparatus and coding method will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2857772

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.