Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system in a specific environment – Mechanical measurement system
Reexamination Certificate
2001-12-18
2004-03-30
Barlow, John (Department: 2863)
Data processing: measuring, calibrating, or testing
Measurement system in a specific environment
Mechanical measurement system
C073S054010
Reexamination Certificate
active
06714879
ABSTRACT:
This invention relates to rheometers. In particular the invention relates to a method for controlling the strain and measurement force of a rheometer.
A typical rheometer comprises at least two bounding surfaces, one or more of which may be moveable by rotation or other means, between which a material whose viscosity or other visco-elastic property is to be measured is positioned. Movement of the moveable surface or surfaces may be controlled, for example by a microprocessor embodied in the rheometer apparatus. Associated with the apparatus are a force actuator for applying a known force to the sample via the one or more moveable surfaces and a position transducer which records displacement of a sample under test and hence the strain which it has undergone for a given applied force.
Two modes of operation are typically possible; firstly open-loop mode, whereby the sample under test is subjected to a known force by the force transducer, secondly closed loop mode, where the sample under test is subjected to a controlled strain by regulation of the torque transducer. By suitable selection of a bearing suspension system (for example, a low friction air bearing or a mechanical bearing with known frictional properties), the first mode of operation can be optimised and the rheometer is thus sometimes termed a ‘controlled stress’ rheometer. In such a controlled stress rheometer, the force or stress is controllable with high accuracy so that the strain may be measured. The second mode of operation is sometimes termed ‘controlled strain’. In this mode, the force becomes the measured variable.
Movement of the moveable surface or surfaces is typically effected by one of two types of motor; an electrically commutated (EC) motor or a purely inductive motor. The latter are a relatively recent development in rheometer design and dispense with the conventional use of permanent magnets. These designs have an extremely low moment of inertia and can respond quickly when required to accelerate or change position. The former, which are sometimes referred to as brushless DC motors, rely upon permanent magnets placed within the rotor in order to work. This renders them relatively heavy in terms of their inertia and results in that, for a given force, they take longer to accelerate or change position, thereby fundamentally limiting their transient response. Whilst, inductive motors generally out perform EC motors, EC motors are relatively inexpensive to produce and are still in common use.
As described in “Real Controlled Stress and Controlled Strain Experiments With The Same Rheometer”; XIIIth International Congress on Rheology, Cambridge 2000; Lauger and Huck, Physica Messtechnik GmbH have developed an EC motor-based rotational rheometer which incorporates a controller system which enables the strain induced in a sample to be controlled as well as or instead of the applied force. The controller utilises knowledge of the rotor field to adjust the mechanical torque in such a way that it is linear to the total amount of the stator current, whereby a change in the stator current is followed by an almost instantaneous change in the torque. The presetting and measurement of the corresponding properties are done from the same side of the rheometer, thereby avoiding the need for additional transducers. As a result, the rheometer can be operated as a strain actuator and a stress transducer.
A downfall of the Physica system is that it requires the user to adjust the gain on the controller manually via software constants. Thus the Physica system is not fully adaptive and cannot be fully automated.
In a first aspect the present invention provides a method for operating a controlled stress rheometer in a controlled strain mode to follow a demand strain X
d
in a sample having applied thereto a variable demand force T
d
, inducing an actual strain X including the steps of:
monitoring the actual strain X;
continuously comparing the actual strain X with the demand strain X
d
and calculating the difference;
calculating in real time, using an appropriate algorithm, the value of T
d
necessary to adjust the strain from X to X
d
; and
adjusting T
d
to the calculated value so as to effect this strain adjustment.
The method may be implemented in software on a digital signal processor incorporated into the control system of the rheometer. The digital signal processor is configured to output a digital representation of the demand force T
d
this output may be converted, via a digital to analogue converter, to an analogue signal which may be used to control the force actuator of the rheometer. The output of the position transducer of the rheometer is similarly converted to a digital representation of the strain X by a resolver to digital converter and the resulting digital data is input to the digital signal processor. A closed loop algorithm within the digital signal processor calculates the appropriate adjustment to T
d
and relays this to the force actuator.
A suitable algorithm may utilise a transfer function based on the third order solution to the Butterworth approximation typically represented as:
H
(
S
)
=
W
3
S
3
+
S
2
(
1
+
2
Z
)
W
+
S
(
1
+
2
Z
)
W
2
+
W
3
where w is the corner frequency of the function and the controller bandwidth, z is the damping factor and s is the Laplace operator. Values for w and z are determined from:
K
i
=Iw
3
K
d
=(1+2z)Iw−C
K
p
=(1+2z)Iw
2
where Kd, K
i
and K
p
are controller coefficients. C=the coefficient of friction of the rheometer and I=the inertia of the system.
The coefficient of friction and the stiffness of the sample under test will affect the response of the system. However, it has been found in practice that a controller operating in accordance with the invention will give a response close to the third order Butterworth characteristic over a wide range of variation in system coefficient of friction, C. For samples with a low stiffness, however, the stability of the system may be reduced. Preferably, therefor, this is compensated for by reducing all the controller coefficients, K
i
, K
d
and K
p
by a proportionate amount, whilst maintaining a reasonably low controller bandwidth, w. In this way, values may be found for the controller coefficients that permit the controller response to be stable yet effective for a wide range of materials under test.
Some potential applications of apparatus employing the method of the invention may require both high controller bandwidth and high controller stability when used in relation to samples with low stiffness and high coefficients of friction. In such applications, limiting the controller bandwidth and thereby reducing the overall gain can permit stable controller operation.
Some applications may require a higher controller bandwidth than can be achieved as above. In such cases, the effective bandwidth of the controller may be increased by adapting the controller coefficients dynamically. One method for achieving this is to compare the measured response of the controller with the output of a reference model of the preferred system response, such as the third order Butterworth approximation, previously referred to. The difference between the measured controller response, X, and a reference model output estimate, X, may then be used as a parameter to recalculate the controller coefficients dynamically, in order to force the controller response to follow the reference model output more closely.
Another potential application of apparatus incorporating a controller operating in accordance with the present invention is as a compliance free torque measuring device. In such an embodiment, a separate actuator may be used on the opposing surface of the rheometer to effect a deformation in the sample. Other applications may utilise two rheometers operated in accordance with the invention, their moveable surfaces being opposed to each other with the sample between them.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides a method for operating a controll
Evans Nigel
Wilkinson John
Barlow John
Bohlin Instruments Limited
Cherry Stephen J.
Lahive & Cockfield LLP
Laurentano Anthony A.
LandOfFree
Closed loop rheometer does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Closed loop rheometer, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Closed loop rheometer will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3226104