Closed-loop neuromodulation for prevention and treatment of...

Surgery: light – thermal – and electrical application – Light – thermal – and electrical application – Electrical therapeutic systems

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

10035319

ABSTRACT:
A method and apparatus to provide therapy to a patient for protecting cardiac tissue from insult is disclosed. The method comprises delivering closed loop electrical stimulation to one or more predetermined portions of a portion of excitable tissue of the spinal cord of a patient; and monitoring one or more physiologic indices of the body. That is, a closed-loop feedback controller is used to apply electrical stimulation to preselected regions of the spinal cord of a patient's body based upon one or more aspects of the physiologic indices.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3421511 (1969-01-01), Schwartz et al.
patent: 3522811 (1970-08-01), Seymour et al.
patent: 3593718 (1971-07-01), Krasner et al.
patent: 3645267 (1972-02-01), Hagfors
patent: 3650277 (1972-03-01), Sjostrand et al.
patent: 3796221 (1974-03-01), Hagfors
patent: 4044774 (1977-08-01), Corbin et al.
patent: 4146029 (1979-03-01), Ellinwood, Jr.
patent: 4340063 (1982-07-01), Maurer
patent: 4428378 (1984-01-01), Anderson et al.
patent: 4458696 (1984-07-01), Larimore
patent: 4549556 (1985-10-01), Tarjan et al.
patent: 4694835 (1987-09-01), Strand
patent: 4903701 (1990-02-01), Moore et al.
patent: 5031618 (1991-07-01), Mullett
patent: 5058584 (1991-10-01), Bourgeois
patent: 5135004 (1992-08-01), Adams et al.
patent: 5149713 (1992-09-01), Bousquet
patent: 5199428 (1993-04-01), Obel et al.
patent: 5203326 (1993-04-01), Collins
patent: 5220917 (1993-06-01), Cammilli et al.
patent: 5255691 (1993-10-01), Otten
patent: 5292336 (1994-03-01), Spence, Jr. et al.
patent: 5292338 (1994-03-01), Bardy
patent: 5330505 (1994-07-01), Cohen
patent: 5330507 (1994-07-01), Schwartz
patent: 5330515 (1994-07-01), Rutecki et al.
patent: 5331966 (1994-07-01), Bennett et al.
patent: 5331996 (1994-07-01), Ziehm
patent: 5342409 (1994-08-01), Mullett
patent: 5360441 (1994-11-01), Otten
patent: 5464434 (1995-11-01), Alt
patent: 5496363 (1996-03-01), Burgio et al.
patent: 5564434 (1996-10-01), Halperin et al.
patent: 5607418 (1997-03-01), Arzbaecher
patent: 5700282 (1997-12-01), Zabara
patent: 5792187 (1998-08-01), Adams
patent: 5817131 (1998-10-01), Elsberry et al.
patent: 5824021 (1998-10-01), Rise
patent: 6006134 (1999-12-01), Hill et al.
patent: 6058331 (2000-05-01), King
patent: 6073048 (2000-06-01), Kieval et al.
patent: 6134470 (2000-10-01), Hartlaub
patent: 6178349 (2001-01-01), Kieval
patent: 6272377 (2001-08-01), Sweeney et al.
patent: 0 688 577 (1995-12-01), None
Braunwald, M.D. et al, Carotid Sinus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Angina Pectoris and Supraventricular Tachycardia.
Bilgutay, M.D. et al, Vagal Tuning—A New Concept in the Treatment of Supraventricular Arrhythmias, Angina Pectoris, and Heart Failure, Journal of Thorac Cardiovascular Surgery 56 (1): 71-82, Jul. 1968.
Foreman et al, Modulation of Intrinsic Cardiac Neurons by Spinal Cord Stimulation: Implications for its Therapeutic Use in Angina Pectoris, Cardiovascular Research 47, pp. 367-375, Apr. 10, 2000.
Bilgutay, et al., “Vagal Tuning, ” fromJournal of Thoracic&Cardiovascular Surgery, Jul. 1968, 56:71-82.
Braunwald, et al., “Carotid Sinus Nerve Stimulation in the Treatment of Angina Pectoris and Supraventricular Tachycardia,” fromCalifornia Medicine, The Western Journal of Medicine, Mar. 1970, 112(3):41-50.
Armour, “Instant-to-Instant Reflex Cardiac Regulation,” 1976, 309-328.
Schwartz, et al., “Effect of dorsal root section on the arrhythmias associated with coronary occlusion,” fromAmerican Journal of Physiology, Sep. 1976, pp. 923-928.
Blair, et al., “Responses of Thoracic Spinothalamic Neurons to Intracardiac Injection of Bradykinin in the Monkey,” fromCirculation Researchvol. 51, No. 1, Jul. 1982, pp. 83-94.
Ammons, et al., “Vagal Afferent Inhibition of Spinothalamic Cell Responses to Sympathetic Afferents and Bradykinin in the Monkey,” fromCirculation Research, vol. 53, No. 5, Nov. 1983, pp. 603-612.
Blair, et al., “Responses of Thoracic Spinothalamic and Spinoreticular Cells to Coronary Artery Occlusion,” fromJournal of Neurophysiology, vol. 51, No. 4, Apr. 1984, pp. 636-648.
Ammons, et al., “Effects of intracardiac bradykinin on T2—T5medial spinothalamic cells,” fromAmerican Journal of Physiology, 1985, pp. R147-R152.
Blair, et al., “Activation Of Feline Spinal Neurons By Potentiated Ventricular Contractions And Other Mechanical Cardiac Stimuli,” fromJournal of Physiology, 1988, pp. 649-667.
Schwartz, et al., “Autonomic Mechanisms And Sudden Death—New Insights From Analysis Of Baroreceptor Reflexes In Conscious Dogs With and Without A Myocardial Infarction,” fromCirculation, vol. 78, No. 4, Oct. 1988, pp. 970-979.
Hobbs, et al., “Cardiac And Abdominal Vagal Afferent Inhibition Of Primate T9—S1Spinothalamic Cells,” fromThe American Physiological Society, 1989, pp. R889-R895.
Butler, et al., “Cardiac Responses To Electrical Stimulation Of Discrete Loci In Canine Atrial And Ventricular Ganglionated Plexi,” fromThe American Physiological Society, 1990, pp. H1365-H1373.
Hull, et al., “Heart Rate Variability Before And After Myocardial Infarction In Conscious Dogs At High And Low Risk Of Sudden Death,” fromThe American College of Cardiology, 1990, pp. 978-985.
Armour, M.D., “Intrinsic Cardiac Neurons,” fromJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, vol. 2, No. 4, Aug. 1991, pp. 331-341.
Chandler, et al., “Effects Of Vagal Afferent Stimulation On Cervical Spinothalamic Tract Neurons In Monkeys,” fromPain, 1991, pp. 81-87.
Linderoth, M.D., et al., “Effects Of Sympathectomy On Skin And Muscle Microcirculation During Dorsal Column Stimulation: Animals Studies,” fromNeurosurgery, vol. 29, No. 6, 1991, pp. 874-879.
Vanoli, et al., “Vagal Stimulation And Prevention Of Sudden Death In Conscious Dogs With A Healed Myocardial Infarction,” fromCirculation Research, vol. 68, No. 5, May 1991, pp. 1471-1481.
Cardinal, et al., “Distinct Activation Patterns Of Idiovenricular Rhythms And Sympathetically-Induced Ventricular Tachycardias In Dogs With Atrioventricular Block,” fromPACE, Sep. 1992, pp. 1300-1306.
Fu, et al., “Vagal Afferent Fibers Excite Upper Cervial Neurons And Inhibit Activity Of Lumbar Spinal Cord Neurons In The Rat,” fromPain, 1992, pp. 91-100.
Hobbs, et al., “Evidence That C1and C2Propriospinal Neurons Meditate The Inhibitory Effects Of Viscerosomatic Spinal Afferent Input On Primate Spinothalamic Tract Neurons,” fromJournal of Neurophysiology, vol. 67, No. 4, Apr. 1992, pp. 852-860.
Hobbs, et al., “Segmental Organization Of Visceral And Somatic Input Onto C3—T6Spinothalamic Tract Cells Of The Monkey,” fromJournal of Neurophysiology, vol. 68, No. 5, Nov. 1992, pp. 1575-1588.
Chandler, et al., “A Mechanism Of Cardiac Pain Suppression By Spinal Cord Stimulation: Implications For Patients With Angina Pectoris,” fromEuropean Heart Journal, 1993, pp. 96-105.
Huang, et al., “Effects Of Transient Coronary Artery Occlusion On Canine Intrinsic Cardiac Neuronal Activity,” fromIntegrative Physiological and Behavioral Science, vol. 28, No. 1, Jan.-Mar. 1993, pp. 5-21.
Adamson, et al., “Unexpected Interaction Between β-Adrenergic Blockage And Heart Rate Variability Before And After Mycardial Infarction—A Longitudinal Study In Dogs At High And Low Risk For Sudden Death,” fromAmerican Heart Association, Inc., 1994, pp. 976-382.
Ardell, “Structure And Function Of Mammalian Intrinsic Cardiac Neurons,” fromNeurocardiology, 1994, pp. 95-114.
Armour, “Peripheral Autonomic Neuronal Interactions In Cardiac Regulation,” fromNeurocardiology, 1994, pp. 219-244.
Foreman, “Spinal Cord Neuronal Regulation Of The Cardiovascular System,” fromNeurocardiology, 1994, pp. 245-276.
Hull, et al., “Exercise Training Confers Anticipatory Protection From Sudden Death During Acute M

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Closed-loop neuromodulation for prevention and treatment of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Closed-loop neuromodulation for prevention and treatment of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Closed-loop neuromodulation for prevention and treatment of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3745711

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.