Winding – tensioning – or guiding – Convolute winding of material – Simultaneous winding
Reexamination Certificate
2002-05-23
2004-03-30
Jillions, John M. (Department: 3654)
Winding, tensioning, or guiding
Convolute winding of material
Simultaneous winding
C242S571600, C242S571700
Reexamination Certificate
active
06712308
ABSTRACT:
The invention relates to a chuck for a winding apparatus for carrying and driving a core onto which a web is to be wound or rewound. The invention finds particular application in the rewinding industry, but is also applicable in other areas.
BACKGROUND ART
In the rewinding industry, differential winding is an industry wide term used for a system of rewinding flat sheet products (webs) onto tubes that support the finished product. The tubes are called cores and are usually made from cardboard or, more rarely, plastics, steel, aluminium, or composites. The flat sheet product, or web, can be anything supplied or used in reel, or roll, form. Paper, films, printed packaging and laminated products are most commonly processed. Usually the product is supplied for final rewinding onto cores from larger bulk reels or from a process machine.
The final rewinding process usually also involves another process called slitting, carried out using a combined slitter rewinder machine. This cuts the product formed in earlier processing into narrower widths. Typically, for example, a printing machine would produce printed packaging 1600 mm wide with a number of repeated patterns across its width. The slitting process cuts the full width into individual widths, typically for further use on subsequent machinery for packaging. Confectionery packaging for example uses this process.
After slitting, the individual widths are rewound either alternately onto two spaced, parallel rewinding shafts or side by side onto one shaft in known manner. A means of locating the cores into position and locking them onto the shaft or shafts is employed. The shaft or shafts is/are driven to provide tension, with the aim of enabling the product to be wound to with high quality and repeatability. The speed of processing is typically 7.5 m/s but in some machines is engineered to be 16.6 m/s. The main criterion for producing acceptable quality for the finished rolls is tension control.
Two systems exist for this. The first and generally the least sophisticated is termed as lock bar winding. This describes the cores being locked onto the rewind shaft and rotating in unison with it, the rewind shaft being driven by a drive motor. The sheet, or web, tension is thus distributed across the whole web width and is controlled by the drive motor torque. The torque is varied to give the desired winding tension and is usually varied to maintain a constant sheet tension throughout the reel as the diameter increases. Various means are available for establishing the roll diameter at any time during winding and this can be used to give increasing torque to the shaft to maintain a constant tension rewind as reel diameter increases during winding. Taper tension (decreasing web tension progressively) can also be used and gives reduced web tension proportionally as the reel diameter increases. Taken to the extreme this is sometimes termed constant torque winding.
The second means of rewinding is differential winding. This aims to compensate for variations in material parameters, such as thickness, across the web. Considering that several thousand layers of material can rewound onto a single reel, if there is a web thickness variation of just one micron, the resulting finished reel diameter can be significant. Lock bar winding has limitations due to this effect; when two or more reels are carried on one shaft, as the reel with the largest diameter due to thickness variation across the width of the supply web builds in diameter its web speed increases and this reel takes more tension, reducing the tension in the other reel on the same shaft. Differential winding allows each core to rotate at a different speed, however slight, and through the differential system aims to maintain a constant tension on each reel regardless of reel diameter.
There are many systems for differential winding available, but they all suffer in one or more areas with limitations as to their use. Typically a system consists of a driven shaft approximately 50 mm diameter (the most common core internal diameter=3″) with core holders positioned on the shaft line with the cores. Core position along the shaft is adjusted using plain spacers; either side of each core holder is a spacer.
The spacers are keyed to and driven by the shaft and the core holders are freely rotatable relative to the shaft, being supported on plain bearings, such as bronze, plastic or similar bushings. The core holders are separated from the spacers by friction elements and driven by torque transfer from the spacers via the friction elements.
The shaft is driven about 5% faster than the web speed. This is termed overspeed. It is advantageous to keep the overspeed as low as possible to reduce heating at the friction elements. In use, the shaft carries a stack of core holders and spacers along its length and a variable axial load can be applied to the stack. The driven spacers either side of each core holder are thus loaded axially on to the friction elements which in turn load the sides of the core holder to provide torque to the core. By varying the axial load the torque is varied to the core holders.
This conventional system has fundamental faults in trying to maintain a constant controllable rewind tension. One problem relates to the bushings within the core holders. Web tension is generated through friction from the bushings, which increases as the reel weight increases during winding and becomes an uncontrolled component of the tension.
Additionally, because the core holders are located axially, a tension gradient is produced along the shaft. The first core holder is loaded with all the axial force and when the tension required is very light the core holder at the other end of the shaft sees very little of the remaining force due to friction on the bushings and weight of the reels along the shaft. With more reels and weight the problem increases.
Other problems can be generated by the use of lay on rollers. These are used when high speed winding generates a layer of entrained air between layers of the reels. This layer of air acts as a lubricant affecting the stability of the reels, The lay on rollers are usually run on the upper surface of the reels under pressure to expel air, and this downward pressure also generates more unwanted tension in the rewind reels.
Set up time in adjusting the position of the core holders is also a restriction in the use of this conventional system. One known solution to this problem is to fill the shaft with core holders allowing the cores to be positioned anywhere along the shaft. The disadvantages of this arrangement include the across shaft tension difference, weight and cost.
Regarding the across shaft winding tension difference, this arises because of the larger number of core holders to be driven. If the core holders are driven as described above using a shaft end load to control drive torque, the core holders near to the shaft end where the end load is applied receive a larger end load and are therefore driven at higher torque than the core holders at the other end of the shaft.
Lubricants are sometimes employed to alleviate this effect but with detriment to hygiene. Problems can also arise as the (cardboard) cores commonly generate dust, which can contaminate any lubricant used.
A known design to overcome the problems of using shaft end load to control core torque is to use a separate form of core holder known as a differential chuck, and a corresponding shaft as described below. The driven shaft incorporates four air-inflatable flexible tubes along its length and corresponding friction segments which are pushed radially outwards by the tubes as they are inflated. Each differential chuck comprises a steel-lined inner surface on which the friction segments act to transfer torque from the shaft to the differential chuck. The force acting on the inner ring is proportional to the air pressure, which is controlled to control the torque transmitted evenly to all differential chucks on the shaft.
In such a design, each chuck is assembled on the shaft to
Ashe Controls, Ltd.
Jillions John M.
Townsend and Townsend / and Crew LLP
LandOfFree
Chuck for a winding apparatus does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Chuck for a winding apparatus, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Chuck for a winding apparatus will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3202515