Power plants – Reaction motor – Liquid oxidizer
Reexamination Certificate
1999-12-01
2001-08-14
Thorpe, Timothy S. (Department: 3746)
Power plants
Reaction motor
Liquid oxidizer
Reexamination Certificate
active
06272847
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to aerospace propulsion. In particular, the present invention is directed to a liquid propellant rocket engine apparatus.
2. Description of the Prior Art
The aerospace industry is continuously looking for apparatuses and methods to reduce the cost of launching payloads into space. Presently, the typical launch cost for the injection of a payload into earth orbit is approximately ten thousand dollars per pound of payload. Most of the cost associated with this process is attributable to the large, complex, and expensive systems utilized to operate a launch vehicle.
Recently, there have been a number of attempts to reduce the cost per pound of payload through a combination of innovative vehicle designs and infrastructure developments. Unfortunately, although these efforts have been successful with regard to some areas, the cost per pound of payload continues to remain substantially unchanged. A primary reason for this lack of progress is the fact that most of the current efforts utilize liquid propellant rocket engine designs that are almost four decades old. Utilization of these vintage designs continues due the perceived high cost of developing and exploiting newer launch systems. In addition, cumulative increases in the reliability of these older rocket engine designs, coupled with a familiarity in their maintenance and operation, renders them among the currently preferred launch systems.
It has been noted that the performance characteristics of liquid propellant rocket engines improve as combustion chamber pressures are increased. In order to exploit the effects of increased chamber pressure, liquid propellant rocket engines are either tank pressurized or turbo-pump pressurized.
In a tank pressurized liquid propellant rocket engine, the propellant is pressurized in a main storage tank by either premixing of a small quantity of the propellants or by gas pressurization via the utilization of a chemically inert gas. The advantage of tank-pressurized systems is that is that they are relatively simple to construct. The disadvantage of tank-pressurized systems is that the propellant storage tanks must be designed to withstand extreme pressure and, as a result, are very heavy. This later fact results in a decrease in rocket vehicle performance with a commensurate increase in the cost per pound of payload.
In a turbo-pump pressurized liquid propellant rocket engine, a turbo-pump is employed to pressurize the propellants prior to their injection into the combustion chamber. To this end, measured quantities of propellants are chemically reacted and used to drive a turbine that spins a shaft and drives a centrifugal pump. The pump, in turn, pressurizes the propellants prior to their injection into the combustion chamber. The advantage of a turbo-pump system is that the main propellant storage tanks can be at a very low pressure and, thus, can have a lightweight configuration. The disadvantages of turbo-pump systems are that turbo-pumps are, typically, extremely heavy devices configured to generate and withstand high pressures. Further, turbo-pumps can be extremely complicated and expensive to build because they employ complicated blade geometries that must be cast using specialized techniques.
Recently, development has begun regarding a rocket engine employing as propellant liquid oxygen, commonly referred to as “LOX,” and kerosene. These efforts utilize a rocket engine employing a completely ablative nozzle and combustion chamber. In operation, a single-shaft turbo-pump is employed to pressurize the propellants prior to their injection into the combustion chamber. The cost effectiveness of this new design is directly linked to the cost of the turbo-pump system. Thus, the current high cost of the proposed turbo-pump, i.e., in excess of one hundred thousand dollars, continues to limit the effectiveness of these systems in decreasing the cost per pound of injecting a payload into earth orbit or space.
A need exists for a reliable rocket engine apparatus that can be employed with a propellant including liquid oxygen and kerosene that is economical to manufacture and that does not suffer from the foregoing design and cost limitations.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the present invention to provide a centrifugal direct injection engine apparatus that does not suffer from the limitations and disadvantages of prior art apparatuses.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a centrifugal direct injection engine apparatus in the form of a centrifugal direct injection rocket engine apparatus having an ablative nozzle and combustion chamber.
It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a centrifugal direct injection rocket engine apparatus that is easily and economically produced.
Other general and specific objects of the invention will in part be obvious and will in part appear hereinafter.
The centrifugal direct injection rocket engine apparatus of the invention is characterized by at least one self-driven, rotatable propellant injection manifold. The injection manifold is positioned within a combustion chamber of the rocket engine. In operation, the rocket engine apparatus of the invention can produce approximately 200 pounds of thrust. Preferably, the thrust output of the rocket engine apparatus of the invention is scalable for a given application. Preferably, the propellant fuel mixture, liquid oxygen, commonly referred to as “LOX,” and kerosene, is pressurized by a single rotating injection manifold. In the preferred embodiment of the invention, a completely ablative nozzle and combustion chamber are employed.
The injection manifold is rotatably mounted within the combustion chamber and can include a top or upper disk element, a middle or intermediate disk element, and a bottom or lower disk element. The disk elements are interconnected so as to form a unitary body.
The upper disk element typically includes an inlet element in fluid communication with a series of nozzle elements. The inlet element is configured to receive kerosene or other similar propellant. The nozzle elements are configured to provide an egress through which an aerosolized kerosene spray can exit the injection manifold and enter the combustion chamber.
Structurally, the intermediate disk element generally includes an inlet element, a settling chamber, and a series of outlet elements. The inlet element is configured to receive liquid oxygen or other similar propellant. The outlet elements, i.e., nozzle elements, provide exhaust portals through which oxygen in a gaseous state can exit the intermediate disk element. These nozzle elements, like those utilized in connection with the kerosene propellant component, are positioned so that the exiting oxygen gas causes this disk element, and those connected to it, to rotate. More particularly, these nozzle elements of this disk preferably are oriented so that the forces generated by the exiting oxygen gas are oriented substantially perpendicularly, and tangentially, to the axis about which the injection manifold rotates so as to cause the existing oxygen jet to impart a torque on the manifold.
The lower disk element includes a series of heat exchange channel elements which function to heat the liquid oxygen propellant prior to its ignition in the combustion chamber. More particularly, liquid oxygen enters the heat exchange channel elements of the lower disk element via passages extending between the intermediate disk element and lower disk element. As the liquid oxygen passes through the heat exchange channel elements, it is vaporized by means of heat transfer from the combustion chamber. The heated oxygen is then directed back into the intermediate disk element. More particularly, the gaseous oxygen is directed into the settling chamber in the intermediate disk element via ports extending between the lower disk element and intermediate disk element. Typically, the lower disk element includes an inert polymer insert element. This insert element maintains the oxygen in
Bello Herbert L.
Gartenberg Ehud
Thorpe Timothy S.
LandOfFree
Centrifugal direct injection engine does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Centrifugal direct injection engine, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Centrifugal direct injection engine will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2519211