Metal founding – Process – Shaping liquid metal against a forming surface
Reexamination Certificate
2001-08-17
2002-12-31
Lin, Kuang Y. (Department: 1725)
Metal founding
Process
Shaping liquid metal against a forming surface
C164S119000, C164S063000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06499529
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to centrifugal countergravity casting of metals and alloys.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
A countergravity casting process for making investment castings in gas permeable ceramic shell molds is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,863,706; 3,900,064; 4,589,466; and 4,791,977. The ceramic shell mold is formed by the well known “lost wax” process and includes an upstanding riser passage around which are located arrays of mold cavities in the shape of the cast articles to be made. The mold cavities are located along the length of the riser passage from proximate a bottom to a top thereof, and each mold cavity communicates to the riser passage via one or more relatively narrow feed gate passages depending upon the configuration of the mold cavity. The ceramic mold is disposed in a vacuum container, and a fill tube is communicated to the bottom of the riser passage and extends out of the container for immersion in an underlying pool of molten metal. A relative vacuum (subambient pressure) is established in the container when the fill tube is immersed so as to draw molten metal upwardly into the riser sprue and into the gate passages and mold cavities. In typical commercial production practice, the molten metal in the gate passages and mold cavities typically is solidified before the vacuum in the container is released, although U.S. Pat. No. 3,863,706 discloses releasing the vacuum in the container after the molten metal in the gate passages and mold cavities has solidified to produce individual cast articles and to allow return of still molten metal in the riser passage to the underlying pool for reuse.
The ceramic shell mold can be disposed in a particulate support media, such as dry foundry sand, in the vacuum container as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,069,271. The thickness of the shell mold wall can be reduced by use of the support media in the vacuum container. The container is evacuated using a vacuum head that also compresses the support media about the shell mold as a subambient pressure is established in the container.
Countergravity casting methods result in a large variation in the time that it takes to fill identical mold cavities located at different elevations along the length of the upstanding riser sprue. Depending on such.parameters as location of the mold cavity along the riser passage, gas permeability of the particulate support media, gas permeability of the ceramic shell mold, rate of evacuation of the container, final vacuum level in the container, and others, the time needed to fill mold cavities of the same shell mold can vary by a factor of two or more. For example, the lowermost mold cavities take the longest to fill with molten metal and the uppermost mold cavities take the shortest time. Delayed filling of the lowermost mold cavities can result in incomplete filling thereof with molten metal. Rapid filling of the uppermost mold cavities can result in entrapped gas defects in the solidified cast articles formed in those mold cavities. Unfortunately, attempts to ameliorate one of the these problems (delayed filling or rapid filling) further promotes the detrimental effects of the other.
Countergravity casting methods also result in a large variation in the pressure in the mold cavities. The pressure in each mold cavity is equal to atmospheric pressure pushing on the surface of the molten metal pool when the container is evacuated minus the static pressure of the molten metal in the riser passage that acts counter to the atmospheric pressure on the pool surface. Thus, the pressure in the mold cavities depends on their elevation along the length of the riser passage; more particularly, the pressure depends on the difference in elevation between the surface of molten metal pool and the gate of the mold cavity. The taller the shell mold, the greater is the pressure variation among mold cavities along the length of the sprue. The pressure reduction increases shrinkage and entrapped gas defects in mold cavities located higher up along the riser.
When the molten metal drawn upwardly reaches the closed, upper end of the riser passage, the upper mold cavities may not yet be completely filled with molten metal. When the riser passage is filled to the top end, the molten metal impacts the top end of the riser passage such that there thus is a resulting surge in pressure differential across the gate passages of the upper mold cavities that causes the upper mold cavities to fill too quickly. Much of any gas entrained in the molten metal in the riser passage is carried into the mold cavities where it can remain in the solidified cast articles formed in the mold cavities.
To prevent flow-back of molten metal from the mold cavities and gate passages, the fill tube is kept immersed in the molten pool sufficiently long for the molten metal to solidify in the mold cavities and gate passages. Having to maintain immersion of the fill tube slows the casting cycle time and requires that the mold follow the dropping level of molten metal in the pool such that the mold become more and more exposed to the induction field that is used to heat the pool. The induction field can retard, or reverse, solidification in the mold and distort the container proximate the fill tube in a manner that permits airflow into the lower mold cavities. Gating design becomes a struggle between having gate passages with sufficient volume to feed the mold cavities, yet narrow enough to solidify molten metal in a timely manner therein. Moreover, these constraints on gate design limit the size of cast articles that can be made by the process described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,863,706 to usually less than one pound.
In countergravity casting of large articles, modifications have been made to the method and apparatus to capture molten metal in the riser passage. For example, one modification disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,589,466 involves pinching shut the metal fill tube through which the molten metal is drawn into the mold after the mold is filled. A ceramic coated ball valve or stopper in the fill tube also have been used to this end. Such process is described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,774,668. U.S. Pat. No. 4,961,455 discloses a refinement of the “check valve” by proposing the use of a ferromagnetic, ceramic coated ball forced by magnets to seal the tube through which the melt is drawn. Use of a siphon-trap in the fill tube and inverting of the mold after casting also have been attempted to this end. Use of a ceramic strainer as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,982,777, or a strainer and convoluted passageway combined as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,146,973, or a siphon-like passageway alone in the fill tuber as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,903,762 to retard alloy flow-back from the riser while the mold is inverted have been disclosed. These modifications partially obstruct flow into the riser and result in slow mold filling. All of these processes require solidification of the molten metal in the riser passage, resulting in relatively low utilization of molten metal. In all of these processes, the geometry of the casting, that is, the number of patterns that can be arranged around the riser, is limited by the necessity of leaving sufficient space around the riser to facilitate the separation of the castings from the riser. U.S. Pat. No. 4,112,997 proposes the inclusion of “stabilizing” screens in the gates. It is claimed that the screens will retain alloy in the mold cavities after pressure in the mold chamber is returned to ambient. If indeed practical and economical, this process would remove the geometric constraint imposed by the cutting of the castings from the solidified riser, by eliminating the riser itself.
An object of the present invention is to provide a centrifugal countergravity casting method and apparatus that overcomes the above described problems and compromises associated with filling of mold cavities at different elevations along the length of the riser passage.
Another object of the invention is to provide a casting method and apparatus for trapping molten m
Hitchiner Manufacturing Co., Inc.
Lin Kuang Y.
LandOfFree
Centrifugal countergravity casting does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Centrifugal countergravity casting, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Centrifugal countergravity casting will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2960823