Cardiac resuscitation device for percutaneous direct cardiac...

Surgery – Instruments – Internal pressure applicator

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C604S500000, C604S509000, C604S104000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06296653

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to methods and apparatus for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and is particularly directed to improved methods and apparatus for performing direct heart massage.
2. Description of the Background Art
In order to resuscitate a patient victim of a cardiac arrest, it is necessary to provide an adequate artificial circulation of oxygenated blood to the vital organs by reestablishing the pumping function of the heart at values as close as possible to the physiological prearrest condition. Such a cardiac pumping function must be instituted at the earliest possible stage. It is documented that a cardiac arrest results in irreversible brain death if a sufficient blood flow is not reestablished within a critical period of time from the moment of the cardiac arrest. Such a period of time is measured ranging between four and six minutes.
In order to reestablish the pumping function of the heart, two methods of cardiopulmonary resuscitation have been used heretofore: external or closed cardiac massage, and internal or open cardiac massage. Closed cardiac massage consists of applying pressure on the anterior chest wall and alternately releasing such pressure. In the vast majority of cases, closed chest compressions produce a severe low flow state, Raymond E. Jackson:
Basic Cardiopulmioniary Resuscitation; Emergency Medicine
, American College of Emergency Physicians. Open chest cardiopulmonary, resuscitation improves hemodynamics, resuscitation and the chance of surviving cardiac arrest.
Cerebral blood flow achieved with open chest techniques has been shown to be near normal physiological values. There are several case reports of patients who have been resuscitated with direct cardiac massage when attempts with closed chest cardiopulmonary resuscitation have been unsuccessful,
Advanced Cardiac Life Support Textbook
, American Heart Association, page 42. However, few physicians today are skilled in the technique of direct cardiac massage. Since most cardiac arrests occur outside of a hospital and since most patients cannot be brought to a facility where a thoracotomy and direct cardiac massage can be performed in less that 15 minutes of total arrest time, the applicability of direct cardiac massage has been limited ACLS textbook, page 42. In addition to that, this technique is often characterized by many physicians as a rather grossly traumatic procedure, often seen as a desperate terminal attempt to resuscitate an arrested heart.
The aforementioned drawbacks of the two prior art techniques of heart massage have been recognized by Prisk and Johnson, who proposed a new method and apparatus for which they obtained a patent, U.S. Pat. No. 3,496,932, issued Feb. 24, 1970. The method and apparatus described by Prisk and Johnson includes an inflatable bladder, insertable through the subxyphoideal region into a space between the sternum and the heart via a trocar-cannula assembly. In order to accommodate the inflatable bladder and its stem, the sharp three-sided tip of the trocar must have a comparably large diameter, as illustrated in
FIG. 4
of the Prisk and Johnson patent. However, the larger the sharp three-sided trocar tip, the more likely are injuries to the heart, coronaries or surrounding organs. In addition to the risk inherent in the size of the sharp tip of the trocar, the blind advancement of a trocar with a sharp tip in the thoracic cavity has been proposed by Prisk and Johnson. Such blind advancement carries extremely high risk of puncturing and/or lacerating the heart, coronary vessels or the surrounding structures, with devastating consequences. Prisk and Johnson's proposed position of blindly inserting the trocar between the sternum and the pericardial sac is, indeed, an extremely risky procedure; this space being very narrow, while it is virtually impossible to insert the trocar into the other designated position, i.e., within the pericardial sac, this space bcing only virtual, since the visceral and parietal pericardium are in contact, separated only by a thin film of pericardial fluid. Furthermore, the device proposed by Prisk and Johnson lacks any mechanism for locating the position of the sharp tip of the trocar and lacks any safety mechanisms to prevent or avoid injuries, such as puncturing of the heart or coronary vessels. Moreover, an inflatable bladder with a laterally flexible stem, as proposed by Prisk and Johnson, lacks the required stability for maintaining its central position to effectively compress the heart. Also, the proposed inflatable-deflatable bladder has no guidance, thus lacking the ability to properly impress direction of the compressions toward the vertebral column, allowing the heart to be displaced during the phase of compression laterally to the column, and not maintaining the heart in position between the vertebral column and the sternum, as required for effective pumping and resulting in ineffective compression of the heart. Given the individual variability in the size and depth of the thoracic cage, the device of Prisk and Johnson is inadequate in that it has no means to adapt to the various depths of the thoracic cavity and ignores the variability in the distance between the sternum and the vertebral column. Finally, the method of insertion of the Prisk and Johnson bladder is a multistep manual procedure, which is necessarily time-consuming and conflicts with the need for a rapid institution of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Buckman and Badellino in their PCT Application No. PCT/US 93/06886 with international filing date Jul. 20, 1993, describe a plunger-likc apparatus for intrathoracic direct substemal heart massage comprising a heart contacting member having a surface which is at least partially concave for contacting the heart and handle means attached to the heart for manually manipulating the apparatus.
With regard to the critical issue of entering the chest cavity to use their plunger like device, in a way that prevents injuries to the intrathoracic organs, and is more practical than a traditional thoracotomy. Buckman and Badellino disclose a “small thoracotomy” which they describe as a full thickness incision by sharp dissection, from side to side of the chest wall, of a width ranging from about three and a half inch to about one inch.
Although a thoracotomy of such a reduced size is indeed an improvement over a traditional thoracotomy, because it is more expedite, still it is not the solution to the problem of entering the chest cavity safely to introduce means for heart compression on a patient with cardiac arrest. Buckman's reduced thoracotomy still cannot prevent the occurrence of pneumothorax, i.e., the collapsing of the lungs. As a matter of fact, with the incision size required by the sizes of the devices as described by Buckman and with the incision sizes actually disclosed by Buckman, pneumothorax is an unavoidable occurrence associated with Buckman's devices. Pneumothorax is obviously a non-acceptable complication in a patient in cardiac arrest who has a critical need for oxygen. A pneumothorax requires the placement of a chest tube to re-expand the lungs, which is another invasive surgical procedure, and adds problems to problems and morbidity to morbidity, and which cannot be practically performed for instance on the field at the site of a cardiac arrest if the cardiac arrest, as most of them do, has occurred outside a hospital setting.
In reality, in prior art, such as in Prisk's invention, an incision of one inch or so is required, and possibly the introduction of the inflatable-deflatable balloon by Prisk may even require a smaller incision than the incisions disclosed by Buckman and Badellino. With that regard, the device proposed by Buckman and Badellino hardly seems to offer a real advantage or be an improvement over Prisk. Yet quite an emphasis is placed in the minimized dimension of the surgical incision required to pass Buckman's device into the chest cavity, to the extent that the procedure of chest massage is named by

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Cardiac resuscitation device for percutaneous direct cardiac... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Cardiac resuscitation device for percutaneous direct cardiac..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Cardiac resuscitation device for percutaneous direct cardiac... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2558982

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.