Canter

Details Canter Canter

1999-03-15

2001-05-08

Bray, W. Donald (Department: 3725)

Woodworking

Rotary cutter

Frusto-conical

C144S176000, C144S223000, C144S228000, C407S046000, C407S101000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06227267

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to the field of chipping heads employed in lumber processing, and in particular to an improved chipping head and wing knife holder structure for the reduction of chip damage.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Applicant is aware of at least one attempt in the prior art to address the problem of chip breakage and crushing during the operation of a wing knife frustro-conical chipping head. In particular, applicant is aware of U.S. Pat. No. 5,505,239 which issued Apr. 9, 1996 to Sparks for a Blade Arrangement and Blade Holder for Chipper.
Sparks describes that a common use for such a chipper is to open the faces of a log. He describes the chipping operation formed on a log as removing the log material at two opposed sides, that is, outside of a vertical chord through each side of the log, thereby forming the so-called cant. Sparks identifies that the material removed by the chipper is valuable for making pulp especially if the material is cut into chips of generally consistent size. Sparks identifies that one problem in the prior art in the formation of chips has been that the chips formed by the blade on the chipping head flow past the blade and blade holder to strike an outer support leg supporting the blade holding structure. Sparks identifies as a second problem that in prior art knife formations, where two knives are abutted to form an angle comer or bend, that wood strands are driven into the interface between the two adjacent blades becoming wedged between the blades causing scoring of the opened faces on the cant.
The Sparks device replaces the prior art spaced leg supports with a single support wall that extends from a forward face of the chipping head, referred to as the inner side of the chipping head or the disc side, outwardly and rearwardly in a sweeping concave-like configuration that extends past the opening previously found between the blade holder and the leg supporting the blade holder. Sparks teaches that rearwardly curved or scoop-shaped surface formed in the support wall provides a guide way that receives and directs or guides the chips past the holder in the direction of natural flow of the chips as perceived by Sparks, Sparks stating that it had previously been perceived that the chip flow path flowed around the blade holder and through the opening between the blade holder and the leg support. As the teaching of Sparks would have it, the chips rather than passing through such an opening and under the blade holder, travel in a more direct outward direction so that a large portion impacts against the support leg causing the chips to break up or be crushed thereby rendering them less valuable for pulp production.
The stated objective of Sparks is to simulate the natural direction of chip flow in the radially outwardly diverging scoop formed underneath the blade holder along the supporting wall of the blade holder so as to avoid the direct impact of the chips against the leg support structure of the prior art. The prior art referred to by Sparks is illustrated herein in
FIG. 1
for comparison purposes. The structure taught by Sparks is illustrated herein and identified as prior art in FIG.
2
.
The present invention is directed to an observation by applicants that perhaps the teachings of Sparks were not entirely complete. In particular, applicants have noticed that wear patterns in the base structure of wing knife holders on Key-knife™ and Furano™ chipping heads indicate that a considerable volume of chip flow is at least initially directed downwardly. That is, the chip flow is directed radially inwardly relative to the axis of rotation of the chipping head, in a direction substantially perpendicular to the perceived lines of chip flow (indicated as lines
38
′ and
40
′) illustrated in the prior art as seen in
FIGS. 1 and 2
, so as to impinge the base structure. In particular, the primary wear pattern is located at a position on the base corresponding to the first two bolt positions nearest the inner side of the chipping head. For ease of reference the position of the primary wear pattern is indicated in
FIG. 2
as
44
′.
Applicant believes that the largest percentage of the chip formation occurs at the radially inner portion of the wing knife blade. This may be intuitively substantiated by a review of FIG.
3
and
FIG. 3
a
which diagrammatically illustrate in plan view a log having an opposed pair of planar faces opened by an opposed facing pair of frustro-conical chipping heads so as to produce a cant flowing in the outfeed direction. As may be seen, the radially outermost portions of the wing knife blades engage the outermost edges of the log, that is, they do not have to slice through relatively long cord lengths through the log. Thus the relative volume of wood removed by the outer portions of the wing knife blades is lower, and hence the chip volume and flow rate is lower, than that created by the radially inner portions of the wing knife blades which slice through relatively longer cord lengths as the sides of the log are chipped away until the final cant dimensions are obtained and the cant passes between the opposed facing chipping head hubs.
Notwithstanding the distribution of the relative rate of chip formation along the length of the wing knife blades, the observed wear patterns on the base of prior art wing knife holders indicate significant chip flow against the innermost portion of the knife holder base, that is, adjacent the radially innermnost end of the wing knife blade. It is applicant's belief that such an impinging flow directed against a structure that in the prior art, including the teaching of Sparks, is a substantially flat plate, cannot but increase the incident of chip breakage and crushing. Thus, although no doubt chip breakage did occur in the prior art against the wing knife holder leg support as identified by Sparks, applicant believes that this is secondary damage compared to primary chip damage occurring at the leading edge side of the innermost portion the knife holder base.
Consequently, it is one of the objects of the present invention to provide a wing knife holder structure which is cantilevered in the form of a wing which extends radially outwardly beyond the base of the knife holder so as to minimize obstruction of the chip flow path, and which, contrary to the teaching of Sparks, in the present invention smoothly deflects chip flow initially in a radial inwardly direction while urging the chip flow to the outer side of the chipping head clear of interference from the rotating chipping head structure.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
In summary, the present invention is an improved chipping head design incorporating an improved wing knife holder mountable onto the chipping head hub. The chipping head hub is an annular hub mounted for rotation in a rotational direction about an axis of rotation. When chipping a log a planar inner face of the hub is adjacent the log and substantially orthogonal to the axis of rotation.
A radially spaced array of the improved wing knife holders are mounted on a peripheral edge of the hub. Each wing knife holder has a plinth for releasable mounting of the knife holder to the peripheral edge of the hub. Advantageously, the plinth mounts to the hub from the rear, that is, the outer side of the hub opposite the inner face. A cantilevered member resembling a horn, arm or wing (and hereafter interchangeably referred to by any one of these terms) is mounted on the plinth. The cantilevered wing is inclined rearwardly and radially outwardly, from an inner end of the wing adjacent the plinth, to an outer end of the wing opposite the inner end. A leading edge of the wing extends between the inner and outer ends of the wing on a leading side of the wing, that is, leading in relation to the rotational direction of the chipping head. The leading edge is forwardly swept in the rotational direction from the inner end to the outer end so as to advance the outer end ahead of the inner end in the direction of rotation. The leading edge has a mounti

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Canter does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Canter, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Canter will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2467632