Cancer drug screen based on cell cycle uncoupling

Chemistry: molecular biology and microbiology – Measuring or testing process involving enzymes or... – Involving viable micro-organism

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

Reexamination Certificate

active

06511818

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Precise coordination of the S and M phases of the eukaryotic cell cycle is critical not only for normal cell division, but also for effective growth arrest under conditions of stress. When damaged, a cell must communicate signals to both the mitotic and DNA synthesis machineries so that a mitotic block is not followed by an extra S phase, or vice versa. The biochemical mechanisms regulating this coordination, termed checkpoints, have been identified in lower eukaryotes, but are largely unknown in mammalian cells
1-3
.
DNA-damaging agents are used in the clinic to preferentially kill cancer cells. However, there is a need in the art to discover additional therapeutic agents which are selectively toxic to cancer cells.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is an object of the invention to provide methods for screening for anti-cancer drugs.
It is another object of the invention to provide cell lines useful for screening for anti-cancer drugs.
These and other objects of the invention are provided by one or more of the embodiments described below. In one embodiment of the invention, a method for screening test compounds to identify those which are potential anti-tumor agents is provided. The method comprises the steps of: determining DNA content of checkpoint gene-defective human cells incubated in the presence and in the absence of a test compound, wherein a test compound which causes DNA accumulation in the checkpoint gene-defective cell is identified as a potential anti-tumor agent.
In another embodiment of the invention, a different method of screening for potential anti-tumor agents is provided. The method comprises the steps of: determining viability or apoptosis of checkpoint gene-defective human cells incubated in the presence and in the absence of a test compound; selecting a test compound which causes cell death or apoptosis in the checkpoint gene-defective cell.
In yet another embodiment of the invention a homozygous checkpoint gene-defective human cell line is provided.
In still another embodiment of the invention a pair of isogenic cell lines is provided. The first cell line is a homozygous checkpoint gene-defective human cell line and the second cell line is a homozygous checkpoint gene-normal human cell line.
These and other embodiments of the invention provide the art with new methods and cell lines for screening potential anti-tumor agents.


REFERENCES:
patent: 5225326 (1993-07-01), Bresser et al.
patent: 5569824 (1996-10-01), Donehower et al.
patent: 5583034 (1996-12-01), Green et al.
patent: 5604113 (1997-02-01), White et al.
patent: 5612018 (1997-03-01), Bonyhadi et al.
patent: 5622836 (1997-04-01), Walker et al.
patent: 5659024 (1997-08-01), Reed et al.
patent: 5985829 (1999-11-01), Harris et al.
Brugarolas, “Radiation-induced Cell Cycle Arrest Compromised By p21 Deficiency,”Nature, 377:552-557 (1995).
Deng, “Mice Lacking p21CIP1/WAF1Undergo Normal Development, But Are Defective in G1 Checkpoint Control,” Cell, 82:675-684 (1959).
Gao, “Somatic Mutations of the WAF1/CIP1 Gene in Primary Prostate Cancer,”Oncogene, 11, 1395-1398 (1995).
Gorczyca, “Detection of DNA Strand Breaks in Individual Apoptotic Cells by the in Situ Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase and Nick Translation Assays,”Cancer Research, 53:1945-1951 (1993).
Hotz, Changes in Nuclear Chromatin Related in Apoptosis or Necrosis Induced by the DNA Topoisomerase II Inhibitor Fostriecin in MOLT-4 and HL-60 Cells Are Revealed by Altered DNA Sensitivity to Denaturation,Exp. Cell Research, 201:184-191 (1992).
Hunter, Cyclins and Cancer II: Cyclin D and CDK Inhibitors Come of Age,Cell, 79:573-582 (1994).
Kung, “Cell Line-Specific Differences in the Control of Cell Cycle Progression in the Absence of Mitosis,”Cell Biology, 87:9553-9557.
Crissmann, H.A. et al. “Normal and Perturbed Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells: Correlation of DNA, RNA and Protein Content by Flow Cytometry.” The Journal of Cell Biology. Jul. 1985, vol. 101, pp. 141-147.
Oberhammer, F. et al. “Induction of apoptosis in cultured hepatocytes and in the regressing liver by transforming growth factor-&bgr;1 occurs without activation of an endonuclease”. Toxicology Letters. Dec. 1992, vol. 64/65, pp. 701-704.
Waldman et al. Cancer Research, vol. 55, pp. 5187-5190.
Bunz et al., Journal of Clin. Invest., vol. 104, pp. 263-269, 1999.
Little et al. The Journal of Biol. Chem. vol. 270, No. 19, pp. 11033-11036, May 1995.
Girinsky et al. Cancer Research, vol. 55, pp. 3726-3731, Nov. 1995.
Vidal et al. Melanoma Research, vol. 5, pp. 243-250, Aug. 1995.
Sherr, “Inhibitors of Mammalian G1Cyclin-Dependent Kinases,”Genes&Development, 9:1149-1163 (1995).
Swat, “Detection of Apoptosis of Immature CD4+8+Thymocytes by Flow Cytometry,”J. Immunol. Meth.137:79-87 (1991).
Woods, “Taxol-Induced Mitotic Block Triggers Rapid Onset of a p53-Independent Apoptotic Pathway,” Molecular Medicine, 1:506-526 (1995).
Takahashi, I, et al. Science vol. 246: 491-494 1989.
Diller et al. Mol. Cell Biol. 1990 vol. 10(11): 5772-5781.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Cancer drug screen based on cell cycle uncoupling does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Cancer drug screen based on cell cycle uncoupling, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Cancer drug screen based on cell cycle uncoupling will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3060380

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.