Internal-combustion engines – Charge forming device – With fuel pump
Reexamination Certificate
2000-09-08
2003-06-03
Miller, Carl S. (Department: 3747)
Internal-combustion engines
Charge forming device
With fuel pump
C123S179170, C123S436000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06571776
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates generally to control of compression-ignition engines, and more particularly to cam sensor elimination in four stroke compression-ignition engines having cylinders with large displacement volumes, such as locomotive or marine type engines.
Although various techniques for eliminating cam sensors have been provided in the context of relatively small spark-ignition engines, these type of techniques are believed not to be suited to the unique designs of larger compression-ignition engines, such as diesel engines. For example, the single cylinder displacement for a large sixteen cylinder locomotive diesel engine may be on the order of 11 liters whereas the single cylinder displacement for a typical diesel truck may be on the order of only 2 liters per cylinder. Therefore a single cylinder for a large locomotive engine may easily be more than five times larger than that of a large diesel truck. In addition, a typical truck engine has 6 or 8 cylinders as opposed to 12 or 16 for a typical locomotive engine, thus each cylinder contributes a smaller portion of the total power. This generally translates into very different design constraints since high injection pressure levels (on the order of 10-20 k.p.s.i.) are required in conjunction with much higher volume fuel flow rate ranges (100-1600 mm<3>/stroke) to effectuate proper combustion in the larger locomotive engine.
Other differences also impact the type of fuel injection system which may be employed on larger compression ignition engines. For example, locomotive engines are typically designed to maintain governor stability e.g., provide a relatively constant speed output to provide a steady power generating source for large traction motors used to propel the wheels. Also, large locomotive engines encounter radical load changes due to switching of large auxiliary loads such as compressor loads, fan loads, and “hotel” power loads (an alternator for generating 110 V at 60 Hz) for passenger train applications. Driving such loads or turning off such loads can result in load changes on the order of 500 horsepower at any instant.
Another design consideration generally unique to such larger engines is lower engine speeds (RPM) and reduced chamber air movement. Smaller engines typically operate at engine speeds of several thousand RPM's. However, larger locomotive engines typically operate at between 0-1050 RPM. The rate at which the pistons move generally impacts the air intake speed and/or swirl. Lower RPM typically translates into slower air intake. With smaller volume cylinders, sufficient chamber air movement to allow proper atomization of the fuel to air mixture typically occurs during the power stroke. However, larger cylinders typically have much less cylinder air movement which results in a more stagnant trapped air volume. This generally requires a greater fuel injection pressure to be applied to overcome the in-cylinder compression and penetrate the trapped air volume in a sufficiently atomized state, such that entrainment will result in a homogenous and stoichiometric burn of the air/fuel mixture.
In a conventional locomotive engine design, a crank sensor synchronizes an engine governor unit (EGU) to the crank. A cam sensor, however, determines the respective stroke the engine is actually in, that is, without the cam sensor, the EGU would not be able to determine the difference between a compression stroke and an exhaust stroke. Once the cam position is known, the EGU does not typically need additional cam data because by sensing crank teeth information, the EGU is able to maintain the proper cam sense. Presently, one simply cannot start the locomotive engine without the cam sensor.
In view of the above-discussed issues, it would be desirable to provide control techniques that would allow for reliably providing controlled start of the compression-ignition engine of the locomotive even in the absence of the cam sensor since, presently, the cam sensor is a single point failure in the locomotive. Another reliability enhancement resulting from the elimination of the cam sensor would be to eliminate loss of synchronization in the EGU due to noisy cam pulses. It would be further desirable to lower manufacturing costs of the engine since if one could eliminate the cam sensor, one could also eliminate machining done on the cam sensor cover and timing wheel. Further, wiring and circuitry on the EGU that processes the cam sensor signal could be eliminated. Additionally, elimination of the cam sensor would result in a simpler manufacturing process not requiring time consuming and error prone cam sensor gapping actions.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Generally speaking, the present invention fulfills the foregoing needs by providing in one exemplary embodiment a method for controlling start of a compression ignition engine having a plurality of cylinders. Each cylinder includes a respective piston reciprocally movable between respective top and bottom positions along a cylinder longitudinal axis. The method comprises providing a respective fuel delivery assembly for each cylinder. The method further comprises retrieving from memory a set of fuel delivery assembly firing rules and then processing the firing rules so that a firing signal is delivered to each fuel delivery assembly on every crank revolution during a cranking mode of operation. The fuel delivery assembly is arranged to be responsive to any firing signal received during an injection window leading to the top position along the longitudinal axis so as to supply fuel to each cylinder during that injection window. The fuel delivery assembly is further arranged to be insensitive to any firing signal received outside the injection window so that no fuel is delivered to each cylinder outside the injection window.
The present invention further fulfills the foregoing needs by providing in another embodiment a method for controlling start of a compression ignition engine having a plurality of cylinders. Each cylinder includes a respective piston reciprocally movable between respective top and bottom positions along a cylinder longitudinal axis. The method comprises allows for providing a respective fuel delivery assembly for each cylinder. The method further allows for retrieving from memory a set of fuel delivery assembly firing rules. The firing rules are processed so that a firing signal is delivered to each fuel delivery assembly on every other crank revolution relative to a hypothesized cam position. Reprocessing the firing rules every n engine revolutions so that the firing signal is delivered to each fuel delivery assembly relative to a cam position about 180 degrees relative to the original hypothesized cam position, n corresponds to a positive integer greater that 1.
The present invention further fulfills the foregoing needs by providing in yet another embodiment a method for controlling start of a compression ignition. engine having a plurality of cylinders grouped in at least two sets of cylinders. Each cylinder including a respective piston reciprocally movable between respective top and bottom positions along a cylinder longitudinal axis. The method allows for providing a respective fuel delivery assembly for each cylinder. The method further allows for retrieving from memory a set of fuel delivery assembly firing rules. The method further allows for processing the firing rules so that a firing signal is delivered to each fuel delivery assembly in one of the two sets of cylinders on every other crank revolution relative to a hypothesized cam position and for processing the firing rules so that a signal is delivered to each fuel delivery assembly in the other of the two sets of cylinders on every other crank revolution relative to a cam position about 180 degrees relative to the hypothesized cam position.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4027641 (1977-06-01), Moder
patent: 4554899 (1985-11-01), Engel et al.
patent: 4760830 (1988-08-01), Bullis et al.
patent: 5146900 (1992-09-01), Sekiya
patent: 5394851 (1995-03-01), Cryer et al
Beusse Brownlee Bowdoin & Wolter PA
Miller Carl S.
Mora, Esq. Enrique J.
Rowold, Esq. Carl
LandOfFree
Cam sensor elimination in large four stroke... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Cam sensor elimination in large four stroke..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Cam sensor elimination in large four stroke... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3144003