Multiplex communications – Data flow congestion prevention or control – Control of data admission to the network
Reexamination Certificate
2000-12-29
2004-08-24
Olms, Douglas (Department: 2661)
Multiplex communications
Data flow congestion prevention or control
Control of data admission to the network
C370S253000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06781955
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The invention relates in general to telecommunication networks and related applications and, in particular, to a method and system of modifying resources of data packets in a VLAN environment. More particularly, the invention relates to optimizing call service in a Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) device in a VLAN aware communications network.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Without limiting the scope of the invention, its background is described in connection with modifying VoIP networks for communicating voice data over a data network. The transmission of analog voice over the Public Switch Telephone Network (PSTN) is slow being supplemented by other technologies, such as VoIP. The immediate goal for VoIP service providers is to reproduce existing telephone capabilities at a significantly lower “total cost of operation” and to offer technically competitive alternatives to the PSTN. It is the combination of VoIP with point of service applications that shows the greatest promise for the long term. VoIP provides a competitive threat to the providers of traditional telephone services that, at the very least, will stimulate improvements in cost and function throughout the industry.
Essentially, VoIP may be applied to almost any voice application including simple inter-office intercom to complex multi-point teleconferencing and shared screen environments. The quality of voice reproduction may also be tailored according to the application. For example, customer calls utilizing voice recognition may need to be of higher quality than internal paging over an overhead paging system. Hence, VoIP equipment must have the flexibility to cater to a wide range of configurations and environments and an ability to blend traditional telephony standards with VoIP.
Despite initial excitement among consumers for VoIP services, customers are worried over possible degradation in voice quality due to packetization of voice into voice packets. Whether these concerns are based on experience with early Internet telephony applications or whether they are based on understanding the nature of packet networks, voice quality is a crucial parameter in acceptance of VoIP services.
In addition, VoIP services need to be able to connect to traditional circuit switch voice networks. The International Telecommunications Union (ITU) has addressed this goal by defining H.323, a set of standards for packet based multimedia networks. The network is able to connect with other H.323 terminals or more traditional phone services such as PSTN, ISDN, or wireless phones. H.323 describes how multimedia communications occur between terminals, network equipment, and services on Virtual Local Area Network (VLANS) which often do not provide a guaranteed quality of service. Due to the support of personal computer, communication systems manufacturers and operating systems makers, H.323 has experienced rapid growth. H.323 compliance has been promoted and accepted by Internet phone and VoIP manufacturers as the standard for interoperability.
In a traditional network, groups of computers and other devices such as printers were located on a Local Area Network (LAN). Each of these devices is generally referred to as an end node device. Hubs, bridges or switches are used in the same physical segment or segments connecting all end node devices. End node devices can communicate with other end node devices on the same LAN without the need for a router.
Communications with end node devices on other LAN segments requires the use of a router. Specifically, each LAN is separated from another LAN by a router. As networks expand, more routers are need to separate users into LANs and provide connectivity to other LANS. One drawback to this design is that routers add latency, which essentially delays the transmission of data. One disadvantage to a LAN is that LANs are often setup based on location and geographic constraints. For example, in an office building, all the computers and printers on one floor may be members of one LAN while computers and printers on the second floor may be members of another LAN. However, in actual use, it may be advantageous to connect computers from the first floor with those from the second floor. Thus, it would be more convenient to be able to put all of the end node computers that need to talk to each other on the same LAN.
In an attempt to overcome the physical limitations of LANs, Virtual LANs (VLAN) were developed. For large numbers of VoIP devices, a VLAN is typically used. A VLAN can be viewed as a group of devices on different physical LAN segments which can communicate with each other as if they were all on the same physical LAN segment. VLANs provide a number of benefits over a LAN. Using VLANs, it is possible to group computing devices logically into a single broadcast domain. This allows us to define broadcast traffic for this VLAN to just those devices that need to see it and reduce traffic to the rest of the network. Also, connection speeds increase due to the elimination of latency from router connections. An additional benefit of increased security is realized if access from foreign networks is not allowed, i.e., those that originate from another subnet beyond the router.
In order to implement VLANS, IEEE has propagated Standard 802.1Q which defines the requirements for a VLAN network. Additionally, in order to add a priority to data packets flowing through the network, IEEE has propagated Standard 802.1D to specify a 3-bit priority code, which can be encoded into the Ethernet header of the data packet. The three-bit priority code represents numbers 0 through 7, thus creating 8 choices or 8 different priorities. In a VLAN network implementing IEEE Standards 802.1Q/D, a VLAN having packets of different priorities is enabled.
A disadvantage of the present VoIP devices is that priority is assigned to a default value of 6, regardless of other conditions in the network. This means that low priority tasks are treated the same as high priority tasks without regard to the availability of network resources and the amount of traffic in the network.
In summary, the prior art methods of routing voice data packets around a network do not provide flexibility and efficient use of network resources that is needed for today's networks. A system or method which overcomes these problems would have numerous advantages.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provides for a means for improving call service of a VoIP device in a VLAN environment. With the present invention, data packets are assigned to different priority values based on the traffic level in the VLAN. After receiving a data packet, a VoIP device monitors the level of traffic within the VLAN and makes decisions for data packet handling based on this traffic level. By adjusting the priority handling of data packets in the VLAN in relationship to the current traffic levels, the optimum number of network resources may be allocated for voice packets.
When the VoIP device determines that traffic levels are in a normal range, default priority values are assigned to all data packets. If the current traffic level falls below the normal range, the priority of signaling packets may be increased so that more VoIP phone calls may be placed. Finally, when the current traffic levels are above a normal range, the priority of all non-voice data packets may be decreased so that voice packets may proceed with less interference to their destination.
A technical advantage of the present invention is the ability to optimize voice packets and give them an optimal number of network resources so that they proceed with less interference and delay to their destination.
An additional technical advantage of the present invention is the ability to increase the number of calls possible during traffic levels that are below the normal range.
REFERENCES:
patent: 6061334 (2000-05-01), Berlovitch et al.
patent: WO 00 60826 (2000-10-01), None
Jong S G et al: “Algorithms on dynamic priority scheduling for heterogenous traffic in ATM” Local Computer Networks, 1993., P
Ericsson Inc.
Olms Douglas
Wilson Robert W.
LandOfFree
Calling service of a VoIP device in a VLAN environment does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Calling service of a VoIP device in a VLAN environment, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Calling service of a VoIP device in a VLAN environment will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3296995