Burner

Combustion – Process of combustion or burner operation – Flame shaping – or distributing components in combustion zone

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C431S008000, C431S351000, C431S353000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06183240

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to a burner for operating a unit for generating a hot gas.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Thermoacoustic vibrations represent a danger for every type of combustion application. They lead to high-amplitude pressure fluctuations, to a limitation in the operating range and they can increase the emissions associated with the combustion. These problems occur particularly in combustion systems with low acoustic damping, such as are often presented by modern gas turbines.
In conventional combustion chambers, the cooling air flowing into the combustion chamber acts to dampen noise and therefore contributes to the damping of thermoacoustic vibrations. In order to achieve low NO
x
emissions, an increasing proportion of the air is passed through the burner itself in modern gas turbines and the cooling air flow is reduced. Because of the associated lower level of noise damping, the problems discussed at the beginning correspondingly occur to an increased extent in modern combustion chambers.
One noise-damping possibility consists in the coupling of Helmholtz dampers in the combustion chamber dome or in the region of the cooling air supply. In the case of restricted space relationships, which are typical of modern, compact designs of combustion chambers, however, the accommodation of such dampers can introduce difficulties and is associated with a large measure of design complication.
A further possibility consists in controlling thermoacoustic vibrations by active acoustic excitation. In this procedure, the shear layer which forms in the region of the burner is acoustically excited. A suitable phase lag between the thermoacoustic vibrations and the excitation makes it possible to achieve damping of the combustion chamber vibrations. Such a solution does, however, require the installation of additional elements in the region of the combustion chamber.
It is similarly suitable to modulate the fuel mass flow. In this procedure, fuel is injected into the burner with a phase shift relative to measured signals in the combustion chamber (for example, relative to the pressure) so that additional heat is released at a pressure minimum. This reduces the amplitude of the pressure vibrations.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
This forms the basis for the invention. The invention, is based on the object of creating an appliance which permits effective suppression of thermoacoustic vibrations and is associated with the smallest possible design complication. This object is achieved according to the invention by the burner of the invention.
Coherent structures play a decisive role in mixing processes between air and fuel. The spatial and temporal dynamics of these structures influence the combustion and the release of heat. The invention is based on the idea of perturbing the formation of coherent vortex structures in order, by this means, to reduce the periodic fluctuation in the release of heat and, in consequence, to reduce the amplitude of the thermoacoustic fluctuations.
A burner according to the invention for operating a unit for generating a hot gas consists essentially of at least two hollow partial bodies which are interleaved in the flow direction and whose centre lines extend offset relative to one another in such a way that adjacent walls of the partial bodies form tangential air inlet ducts for the inlet flow of combustion air into an internal space prescribed by the partial bodies. The burner has at least one fuel nozzle. In order to control flow instabilities in the burner, the inside of the burner outlet has a plurality of nozzles along the periphery of the burner outlet for introducing axial vorticity into the flow, the nozzles for injecting air being arranged at an angle to the flow direction.
The invention is therefore based on the idea of perturbing the formation of coherent vortex structures by the introduction of vorticity in the axial direction. In a burner of the generic type, the vorticity is introduced, in accordance with the invention, by air being injected at an angle to the flow direction via a plurality of nozzles. These nozzles are then provided as close as possible to the burner outlet so that their effect can develop as fully as possible.
The relative position of flow direction and injection direction of the air can be completely described by two angles &phgr;, &agr; (
FIGS. 2
,
3
). &phgr; then represents the angle between the injection direction of the air and a plane at right angles to the flow direction and &agr; represents the angle between the injection direction of the air and the direction pointing radially towards the centre line. The nozzles are advantageously arranged in such a way that &phgr; is between −45° and +45°, preferably between −20° and +20°, particularly preferably at approximately 0°. &agr; is advantageously between −45° and +45°, preferably between −20° and +20°, particularly preferably at approximately 0°. In a particularly preferred embodiment, &phgr; and &agr; are each approximately 0° and the injection of the air therefore takes place in a plane at right angles to the flow direction, radially inwards towards the centre line.
The cross section of the nozzles is arbitrary but an elliptical, in particular a circular, cross section is preferred. The nozzles can be advantageously arranged along the periphery of the burner outlet in a plurality of rows and not in one row only.
The flow instabilities in the burner mostly have a dominant mode. The damping of this dominant mode is a priority requirement for the suppression of thermoacoustic vibrations. The wavelength &lgr; of the dominant mode of the instability is derived from its frequency f and the convection velocity u
c
by means of &lgr;=u
c
/f. The relevant frequencies lie between some 10 Hz and some kHz. The convection velocity depends on the burner and is typically some 10 m/s, for example 30 m/s.
Now, it has been found that the dominant mode is suppressed particularly effectively if the distances s between adjacent nozzles along the periphery of the burner outlet are smaller than or approximately equal to half the wavelength of the dominant mode, i.e. s.
Furthermore, particularly effective suppression has been found when the maximum diameter D of the nozzles is greater than approximately a quarter of the boundary layer thickness &dgr; in the region of the nozzles. In the case of elliptical nozzles, the maximum diameter is twice the major semiaxis and, in the case of circular nozzles, twice the radius. For a typical burner, the boundary layer thickness is approximately 1 mm.
It has also been found to be advantageous for the maximum diameter D of the nozzles to be smaller than approximately a fifth of the distance s between adjacent nozzles. Although significant suppression of the thermoacoustic vibrations is achieved when only one of the three conditions quoted is satisfied, a particularly preferred embodiment satisfies all the conditions simultaneously.
If required by the boundary conditions, such as the air mass flow present or the space available, the distances and the diameters of the nozzles can also, however, be adapted to these boundary conditions.
The introduction, in accordance with the invention, of vorticity in the axial direction to perturb coherent vortex structures by injecting air at an angle to the flow direction is applicable not only in the case of the double-cone burner described here but also in the case of other types of burner.
Further advantageous embodiments, features and details of the invention are given by the dependent claims, the description of the embodiment examples and the drawings. The invention is explained in more detail below using an embodiment example in association with the drawings. Only the elements essential to understanding the invention are presented in each case. In the drawings


REFERENCES:
patent: 3879939 (1975-04-01), Markowski
patent: 4054028 (1977-10-01), Kawaguchi
patent: 4257224 (1981-03-01), Wygnanski et al.
patent: 5169302 (1992-12-01), Keller
patent: 537

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Burner does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Burner, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Burner will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2572010

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.