Brokaw transconductance operational transconductance...

Electricity: power supply or regulation systems – Output level responsive – Using a three or more terminal semiconductive device as the...

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C323S273000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06259238

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention is generally related to voltage regulator circuits, and more particularly low quiescent current regulators.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The “dropout voltage” of a voltage regulator equals the minimum input-to-output voltage differential for which the circuit can maintain output regulation. Low-dropout (LDO) voltage regulators generally have dropout voltages of a few tenths of a volt at full rated current. In order to achieve such low dropout voltages, the circuit must use a PNP or PMOS pass element.
FIG. 1
shows a simplified block diagram of a typical prior art PMOS LDO circuit
10
. The pass element is MOS transistor M
1
, which is driven by amplifier A
1
. The amplifier in turn receives the voltage generated by an internal voltage reference VR
1
, and the voltage produced by a voltage divider network R
1
-R
2
. The circuit
10
is connected so that the amplifier achieves equilibrium when the voltage on the tap T of the voltage divider equals the voltage generated by the reference VR
1
.
Many LDO applications require that the regulator consume little current to power its internal circuitry. This quiescent current typically equals 100 &mgr;A for a modern PMOS LDO, and this changes little regardless of output current. The conventional topology of
FIG. 1
can be extended to provide low-current operation, typically down to 10 &mgr;A. Lower currents require nonconventional circuit topologies.
The micropower LDO architecture contains multiple poles at relatively low frequencies, and therefore requires the insertion of compensating zeros to boost the phase, or otherwise the phase margin will deteriorate to the point that the circuit becomes unstable. These zeros are difficult to generate using integrated components because they must lie at relatively low frequencies (10-100 kHz), they must not use large amounts of die area, and they must not consume any current. There are two basic techniques that have been used to insert zeros in this type of LDO architecture:
1) Placing a resistor Resr in series with the load capacitor C
L
producing a zero at w=1/(R
esr
×C
L
). This can't make a low-frequency pole for a small capacitor value unless a large resistor R
esr
is used, which is undesirable. Since micropower architectures have low bandwidth, they require low-frequency poles and this isn't a good solution—by itself.
2) Place a capacitor C (not shown) across the upper resistor R
1
of the feedback divider; this produces a zero at w=1/(R
1
×C). This doesn't work well for small divider ratios because the pole-zero separation becomes too small.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4710728 (1987-12-01), Davis
patent: 4792745 (1988-12-01), Dobkin
patent: 4851953 (1989-07-01), O'Neill et al.
patent: 4902959 (1990-02-01), Brokaw
patent: 5672962 (1997-09-01), Sweeney
patent: 5686821 (1997-11-01), Brokaw

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Brokaw transconductance operational transconductance... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Brokaw transconductance operational transconductance..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Brokaw transconductance operational transconductance... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2466326

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.