Fluid-pressure and analogous brake systems – Multiple fluid-receiving devices – Multiple motors
Reexamination Certificate
1999-04-27
2001-04-10
Schwartz, Christopher P. (Department: 3613)
Fluid-pressure and analogous brake systems
Multiple fluid-receiving devices
Multiple motors
C303S009620, C188S349000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06213566
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND
This disclosure relates generally to brake pressure proportioning in-line ball valves, and more particularly to an improved valve having relatively few components and a relatively short length.
Brake proportioning valves are used in automobiles and other vehicles. In these applications, it is often necessary to proportion brake fluid pressure between front and rear wheel brakes, or cylinders, as less braking power is needed in the rear wheel brakes. A brake pedal is operably attached to a master cylinder, which is connected to the wheel brakes via hydraulic lines. Depressing the brake pedal causes the master cylinder to increase hydraulic pressure at its outlet. The master cylinder outlet is connected to separate hydraulic lines for the front and rear wheel brakes, or for the right and left wheel brakes, to carry the increased hydraulic pressure through the lines to the respective wheel brakes. In either case, a brake proportioning valve, or a plurality of brake proportioning valves, is disposed between the master cylinder outlet and the rear wheel brakes to allow proportionately less hydraulic pressure from the master cylinder to reach the rear wheel brakes, thereby achieving the proper braking proportion.
The brake proportioning valve has an inlet connected to the master cylinder, and an outlet operably connected to the rear wheel brakes. At low inlet pressures, where the brake is not applied, brake fluid flows freely in both directions through the brake proportioning valve. However, as brake fluid pressure increases at the valve's inlet in response to application of the brake pedal, a predetermined level is reached where pressure at the valve's outlet forces a piston to engage a ball to restrict the flow of brake fluid to the rear wheel brakes.
This predetermined level is known as the knee point pressure, and is equivalent to the force holding the valve open divided by a differential relating to the area of the inlet pressure seal and the area of the outlet pressure seal. For the valve to perform, the outlet seal diameter must be greater than the inlet seal diameter. Thus, there is a benefit in making the inlet seal diameter as small as possible so that the outlet seal, and therefore the entire valve, does not take up a great deal of space.
A brake proportioning valve of the prior art is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,522,651, and provides proportioning of brake fluid pressure using a plunger of two diameters against which hydraulic pressure operates, and a check ball located in the plunger and held off its seat under low outlet pressure conditions by a rod and valve lifter. The ball is biased in place by a ball spring. At high outlet pressure, i.e., above the knee point pressure, the plunger contacts the ball and restricts fluid flow. A continuation-in-part of the above-referenced patent, U.S. Pat. No. 5,741,049, operates similarly.
However, several disadvantages are associated with this prior art. First, the rods do not directly engage their respective housings. Instead, each rod requires extra elements, such as a valve lifter assembly, to support the rod, thereby complicating manufacture. Second, the ball springs could become completely compressed by the balls, undesirably restricting fluid flow. Third, the outlet seal diameters are larger than their respective plunger springs' diameter, thus limiting the variety of plunger spring strengths that can be used, and hence lowering the possible range of knee points.
Therefore, what is needed is an apparatus having less components and steps in assembly, as well as a shorter length when compared to the above system, without having the disadvantages associated with the systems.
SUMMARY
Accordingly, one embodiment disclosed herein is a device for controlling the flow of fluid, and therefore fluid pressure. A housing having an inlet for receiving the fluid, an outlet for discharging the fluid, and a bore connecting the inlet to the outlet is provided. A piston is disposed in the bore and has a through bore for permitting the flow of the fluid through the piston. A valve member is disposed in the bore of the piston and adapted to engage an internal surface of the piston to block fluid flow through the piston and therefore through the housing, the piston responding to an increase in pressure at the outlet as a result of the fluid flow for moving in a direction toward the valve member until the valve member engages the piston surface to restrict fluid flow. A stop member is disposed in the housing and extends into the bore of the piston for stopping movement of the piston after it engages the valve member. Further, the embodiment includes means for normally positioning the valve member away from the surface so that fluid flows through the piston.
One advantage of the embodiment described herein is that a piston spring surrounds the valve member and the greater part of the piston, resulting in a relatively shorter valve length.
Another advantage of the embodiment described herein is that the stop member has an extension which protrudes through a valve member spring, thus preventing complete compression of the spring and consequent restriction of flow. Also, the stop member's extension has a cross slot to prevent the valve member from blocking the extension bore and restricting flow during inlet pressure release.
Yet another advantage of the embodiment described herein is that the positioning means directly engages the housing instead of being supported by additional components, thus simplifying manufacture. Furthermore, the housing edge is staked over the stop member, which is more reliable than a pressed-in retainer.
Another advantage of the embodiment described herein is that an inlet pressure seal is disposed inside the piston, which results in a more favorable variation between the inlet seal area and the outlet seal area. Also, no bored venting passage is required, thus facilitating manufacture.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3245221 (1966-04-01), James et al.
patent: 3377108 (1968-04-01), Eddy
patent: 3781063 (1973-12-01), Valpreda
patent: 4335922 (1982-06-01), Berisch et al.
patent: 4606583 (1986-08-01), Gaiser
patent: 4637664 (1987-01-01), Arikawa
patent: 4850651 (1989-07-01), Latvala
patent: 4861114 (1989-08-01), Takata
patent: 4893878 (1990-01-01), Cole et al.
patent: 5066072 (1991-11-01), Yanagi et al.
patent: 5322354 (1994-06-01), Yamakoshi
patent: 5362136 (1994-11-01), Wallestad
patent: 5462341 (1995-10-01), Koyano et al.
patent: 5472266 (1995-12-01), Volz et al.
patent: 5522651 (1996-06-01), Sorensen
patent: 5544946 (1996-08-01), Toyoda et al.
patent: 5741049 (1998-04-01), Sorensen
patent: 684722 (1965-03-01), None
Haynes and Boone LLP
Hilite Industries Automotive, LLP
Schwartz Christopher P.
Williams Thomas J.
LandOfFree
Brake proportioning in-line ball valve does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Brake proportioning in-line ball valve, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Brake proportioning in-line ball valve will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2514782