Buoys – rafts – and aquatic devices – Water skimming or walking device – Having stabilizing surface
Reexamination Certificate
2002-10-09
2004-06-08
Avila, Stephen (Department: 3617)
Buoys, rafts, and aquatic devices
Water skimming or walking device
Having stabilizing surface
C114S039150
Reexamination Certificate
active
06746292
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to an aerodynamically shaped fin and more specifically to a fin that would be attached to the bottom surface of watersports boards such as surfboards and windsurfers.
Conventional surfboard fins have a leading edge and a trailing edge. The top end of the leading edge slopes downwardly and rearwardly. The top end of the trailing edge slopes downwardly and normally ends at a point rearwardly with respect to the top end of the trailing edge. One example of such a surfboard is illustrated in the Knox U.S. design Pat. No. D261,916. The leading edge has a convex curvature extending from its top end to its rear end. The trailing edge has a concave upper portion extending from its rear end that reverse tp form a convex curved portion extending downwardly therefrom to the bottom end of the leading edge.
The Struyik U.S. design Pat. No. D329,039 discloses a personal watercraft fin that incorporates a Pitot tube. It has a leading edge that extends downwardly and rearwardly from its top end in a concave curvature that leaves its bottom end positioned rearwardly with respect to its top end.
The Akins U.S. design Pat. No. D397,394 is directed to curved side fins for a surfboard. Each of the fins has a leading edge that extends downwardly from its front end in a convex curvature. The fins have a trailing edge that extends downwardly from their top end in a concave curvature. The fins also have a transverse curvature as best illustrated in FIG.
1
.
The Kelly U.S. Pat. No. 3,160,897 is directed to a hydroplane surfboard. It has a fin having a front end that extends downwardly and rearwardly in a convex curvature. It has a trailing edge that extends downwardly from its top end in a concave curvature and ultimately meets the bottom of the leading edge. The Bahne Jr. U.S. Pat. No. 3,564,632 and the Brewer et al U.S. Pat. No. 4,044,416 illustrate adjustable surfboard fin holders. The fins illustrated in these patents each have a leading edge that extends downwardly from their top end in a convex curvature. Their trailing edge also extends downwardly from their top end in a concave curvature.
The Collum, Jr. U.S. Pat. No. 4,325,154 and the Lewis U.S. Pat. No. 5,480,331 illustrate surfboard fins that have a leading edge that extends downwardly from their top ends in a convex curvature to their bottom ends. They also have a trailing edge that extends downwardly from their top ends in a concave curvature.
The Fizzell U.S. Pat. No. 5,934,963 and the Block et al U.S. Pat. No. 5,997,376 disclose surfboard fin mounting structures. The fins disclosed each has a leading edge that extends downwardly in a convex curvature. Their trailing edge extends downwardly from their top end in a concave curvature.
The Vogel U.S. Pat. No. 6,059,621 discloses a high performance surfboard having three fins mounted adjacently its rear end. Each of these fins has a leading edge that extends downwardly from its top end in a convex curvature. Their trailing edge extends downwardly from their top end in a concave curvature.
It is an object of the invention to provide a novel bottom fin for a surfboard that reduces vibration and drag when the board rider puts the surfboard into a hard turn and helps the board rider to get through a corner quicker.
It is also an object of the invention to provide a novel bottom fin for a surfboard that provides greater stability on the face of a wave.
It is a further object of the invention to provide a novel bottom fin for a surfboard that is strong yet lightweight.
It is also another object of the invention to provide a novel bottom fin for a surfboard that is economical to manufacture and market.
It is also an object of the invention to provide a novel bottom fin for a windsurfer that provides greater stability on the face of a wave
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The novel fin is designed for use with both surfboards and windsurfer boards although with minor design differences that are specific to each. The fin would be made in various sizes, proportionate to match the specific size/weight of the individual riders and length/type of board. Surfboards also often have two smaller fins, one placed on either side of, and forward of the larger central fin and fairly close to the outer edges of the board. The new fin design is derived from two fundamental engineering principals.
Principal No. 1
The forward swept angle of the fin is derived from an airplane wing design that dates prior to World War II. At that time some gliders were built with forward swept wings and the NACA Langley Memorial Aeronautical Laboratory had done some wind tunnel experiments on the concept in 1931. Also, Germany developed a motor driven aircraft during the war known as the Ju-287. Between 1984 and 1992, NASA conducted tests of this design using two experimental aircraft known as the X-29. The effect of this design is to cause air moving over the forward swept wings to flow inward toward the root of the wing instead of outwards toward the wing tip as occurs on a conventionally aft swept wing. This reverse air flow considerably retards the onset as stall (at high angles of attack) at the wing tips and ailerons, something that happens much more readily with a conventional design.
Principal No. 2
The second principal that is combined with the forward swept angle is derived from the “bulbous bow” design that is almost always found on large ocean going vessels, whether it is a warship or a commercial vessel. The purpose of the design is to reduce the number of pressure waves caused by a vessel as it moves through the water, thus reducing the amount of resistance, which results in less drag, higher speeds and lower fuel costs. This same principal can be seen in modern submarine design that dates back to the USS Albacore, built during the early 1950's. This new “tear drop” design was a radical departure from all previous designs before it and allowed much faster speeds, and improved maneuvering, under water.
Current surfboard and windsurfer boards have fins having a wide range of designs, ranging from those that use a straight leading edge and/or trailing edge to those that are sharply curved, depending on the type of sailing or racing intended. Essentially, they parallel the principals of conventional airplane wing design in that, to one degree or another, they are all swept back. The one aspect more or less common to them all is that, in the same manner as wind passing over conventional airplane wings, they tend to direct water flow toward the tip of the fin. When the board is put into a hard turn, the water flow turbulence off the end of the fin causes a vibration, or flutter, and drag. The design of the novel fin will reduce that flutter/drag and help the board rider get through a corner quicker. It will also reduce drag when the rider is traveling in a straight line.
The basic shape for the improved fin design is the same regardless of which type of board it's intended for, however, the version intended for use on a surfboard has a slight teardrop design incorporated into the bottom of the fin. It is also intended to make versions available without the teardrop shape for those who prefer not to have it.
The design for the windsurfer board does not have the full teardrop shape, only a bulbous shape at the front bottom end which is more or less flush with, but no wider than, the widest point of the main fin body at the bottom where it joins. The reason for the difference lies in the different types of actions inherent to each board types purpose.
Although the surfboard is intended to go across and down, or up the face of a wave, it nevertheless travels in more or less a stable plane of depth with regard to the fin's movement through the water. It's this relative stability that allows the teardrop design to help in both reducing drag and in maneuvering.
On the other hand, a windsurfer board is designed to cut across the top of waves and, since the surface of the water is undulating, the same teardrop design that would be beneficial to a surfboard would actually i
Avila Stephen
Logan II Charles C.
LandOfFree
Bottom fin for a watersports board does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Bottom fin for a watersports board, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Bottom fin for a watersports board will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3349981