Compositions: coating or plastic – Materials or ingredients – Pigment – filler – or aggregate compositions – e.g. – stone,...
Reexamination Certificate
2003-05-29
2004-10-12
Brunsman, David (Department: 1755)
Compositions: coating or plastic
Materials or ingredients
Pigment, filler, or aggregate compositions, e.g., stone,...
C106S274000, C106S275000, C106S279000, C106S280000, C106S281100, C106S287240, C524S059000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06802897
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to a slurry of sulfur in a liquid carrier comprising at least one biodiesel, the use of the sulfur as a cross-linking agent for cross-linkable molecules, and asphalt compositions containing asphalt and sulfur/biodiesel slurry.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Road building has been a source of inspiration and aggravation for civilization for millennia. Ancient Rome built roads that would last for centuries, but which required an enormous investment in labor and materials and a high level of sophistication. In the 1830's, travelers prized the opportunity to travel on short stretches of macadam roads made of three layers of graded stone, the top layer of which contained some bituminous or asphaltic binder.
The need to reduce costs and use locally available materials led to wooden plank roads, which were, in turn, replaced with asphalt roads. By the early 20
th
century, asphalt roads, mixtures of gravel and asphaltic petroleum fractions, were the dominant roads. Many times an asphalt gravel mix/was simply poured on a minimally prepared surface. Such roads could be built cheaply and quickly with unsophisticated labor, but such roads deteriorated rapidly.
Roman roads lasted for centuries, but took decades to build. Macadam roads, built according to the original rigid specifications of 1830, lasted for decades, but took months or years to build. Many asphalt roads were built in weeks or months only to deteriorate after a few years. Asphalt roads that deteriorate rapidly do so because of lack of surface preparation and drainage, poor construction practices, and poor quality materials.
Asphalt roads have come full circle. The early macadam roads were prized for their quality and durability. Many modern macadam roads suffer a largely undeserved poor reputation for quality.
There is a renewed interest in building quality roads with asphalt as civil engineers and municipalities realize that better asphalt roads are possible by using better surface preparation, construction practices, and better asphalts.
Some improvements in asphalt properties were achieved by selecting the starting crude petroleum, or control of the refinery processing steps used to make the asphalt. Unfortunately, there are many crudes which do not make good asphalts. There are only a limited number of steps which can be taken to control the refining process to make better asphalt.
The next step taken by the industry was to modify the asphalt. Air blowing makes asphalts harder. Fluxing agents or diluent oils are sometimes used to soften the asphalt.
Marked changes in asphalt properties can be achieved with sulfur, either added to neat asphalt or when added as a cross-linking agent to treat a mixture of asphalt and polymer.
The conventional methods of adding sulfur (dumping loose powder or bags of powdered sulfur on top of molten asphalt in a mix tank) had some problems. Of significant concern is safety. There exists the potential for fire and explosion hazards, caused by having a potentially large cloud of hot and flammable sulfur dust. Sulfur dust is by its very nature considered explosive.
It is also difficult in a commercial facility to rapidly and completely mix powdered sulfur with asphalt. Some parts of the asphalt contained too much sulfur too rapidly while other parts of the blend were sulfur deficient. Such an approach, led to over cross-linking parts of the blend, forming lumps of super-vulcanized materials which were not compatible with the rest of the blend.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,004, Hayner and U.S. Pat. No. 6,133,351, Hayner, which are expressly incorporated herein by reference, disclosed use of a sulfur slurry for sulfur addition to asphalt, rather than dry, powdered sulfur. In a preferred embodiment, the finely ground sulfur was mixed with a portion of a flux oil which would be added to the asphalt. The '004 and 351 patents described the use of suitable flux oils found in myriad refinery streams, including various neutral oils, aromatic extract, vacuum gas oil and refinery bottoms streams.
While the sulfur slurry method taught in the '004 and '351 patents was a significant improvement over the state of the art in asphalt manufacture, there are some areas where further improvement is still needed. Sulfur slurries, if not used fairly promptly after manufacture, can settle into a S rich sludge and a S lean oil phase above the sludge. Remixing (or prompt use) solves this problem, but it is a nuisance and time-consuming, which, in turn, raises the costs.
One attempt to solve these problems included the use of relatively heavy liquid refinery streams, which reduced hydrocarbon vapor pressure and made the sulfur slurry safer to use, but produced relatively viscous slurries which were hard to pump.
There are also concerns about, and some localities have limits on, exposure of workers to aromatics. Essentially all refinery streams heavier than gasoline have significant amounts of aromatics present, unless the aromatics have been removed or hydrotreated so severely as to saturate the aromatics.
In addition, the conventional refinery liquid streams can have a significant vapor pressure, leading to risk of fire and even, in some cases, of explosion. Although the risk of explosion can be eliminated, and the risk of fire greatly reduced by using a higher boiling liquid hydrocarbon stream, the higher boiling streams are more viscous and difficult to pump.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The present invention provide a slurry of sulfur in a liquid carrier comprising as ester derived from vegetable oils or animal fats. In one aspect, the present invention relates to the use a natural biodiesel, derived from vegetable oils or animal fats, as the liquid part of the sulfur slurry. So far as is known, biodiesel has never been used to form a sulfur slurry until the present invention. Rather, the only use of biodiesel to form a slurry was described in Development of Biodiesel Slurry Fuels, reported on page 57 of Biodiesel Research Progress 1992-1997, K. Shaine Tyseon, Editor, available on WWW at http://www.ott.doe.gov/biofuels/pdfs/biodiesel 92-97.pdf, which paper is incorporated herein by reference. The slurry fuel described therein was finely ground (LT 100 micron) corn or sorghum in biodiesel.
Biodiesel is now well known and widely available commercially and extensively studied, as shown by over 100 papers included in the report, Biodiesel Research Progress, discussed above. Biodiesels are attractive for fuels, and some other uses, because they have a low vapor pressure, are non-toxic and are stable, as per HMIS regulation, and do not deteriorate or detonate upon mild heating. Chemically, biodiesels are generally defined as the mono alkyl esters of long chain fatty acids derived from renewable lipid sources.
Although these benefits (safety, toxicity) are characteristic of biodiesel, it was not until the present invention that the inventors herein thought to look at biodiesel as a suitable vehicle for getting sulfur into an asphalt blend. In particular, there were some concerns about compatibility of biodiesel in asphalt. Asphalt is high molecular weight and highly aromatic. In contrast, biodiesel is aliphatic, contains no sulfur, has no ring structures or aromatics, and is relatively in low molecular weight, as compared to asphalt. Also, biodiesel also contains large amounts of oxygen, approaching 10%. Until the present invention is was believed that a linear, relatively low molecular weight, aliphatic molecule such as biodiesel would be better for precipitating asphalt from crude oil than for efficiently dispersing a sulfur slurry into asphalt.
Despite these concerns, it was surprisingly found by the inventors herein that the aliphatic biodiesel sulfur slurry was completely satisfactory. The use of biodiesel provides the benefits of fire hazard safety and low toxicity and is a satisfactory vehicle for the sulfur particles. In addition, the sulfur-in-biodiesel suspension is relatively stable and does not separate as rapidly as do sulfur
Alcorn, II James R.
Lackey Kenneth R.
Brunsman David
Emch, Schaffer, Schaub & Porcello & Co., L.P.A.
Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC
LandOfFree
Biodiesel sulfur slurry does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Biodiesel sulfur slurry, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Biodiesel sulfur slurry will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3321277