Classifying – separating – and assorting solids – Precedent preparation of items or materials to facilitate...
Reexamination Certificate
1997-08-20
2001-06-05
Nguyen, Tuan N. (Department: 3653)
Classifying, separating, and assorting solids
Precedent preparation of items or materials to facilitate...
C209S352000, C209S682000, C209S911000, C209S930000, C414S412000, C083S425300
Reexamination Certificate
active
06241097
ABSTRACT:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
This application is cross-referenced to applicant's commonly-assigned copending application Ser. No. 08/401,720, filed on Mar. 10, 1995, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,077,021 the disclosure of which is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH
Not applicable.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to front-end separation of separate fractions of municipal solid waste (MSW) and more particularly, in one aspect, to an improved assembly for splitting open bags bearing MSW fractions such as, grass, leaves, yard waste, and the like; and, in another aspect, for splitting open bags bearing cans, bottles, and the like, e.g., so-called “blue bags”. “Blue bags” refers to bags (the color blue relating to the bag color used in the original curbside recycling programs, though bags of any color can be used) that contain separated recyclables, e.g., paper, newsprint, plastics, aluminum cans, plastic bottles, or the like.
Solid waste materials of the type typified by MSW traditionally have presented problems of disposal. These disposal difficulties have become increasingly critical as populations have expanded and as the per capita production of solid waste has increased. In addition to using waste as a source of fuel or compost, industrial and home refuse or MSW typically comprises several components or fractions which are worth reclaiming. In particular, glass, ferrous and non-ferrous metals, plastic, and paper components are sufficiently valuable to justify their separation from composite MSW. Conventionally, such solid waste has been disposed of by incineration and/or landfill. With the present concern over problems associated with the protection of the environment and because of scarcity of landfill space and governmental regulations, both of these traditional techniques of disposal have become undesirable. Further, separation systems, to remain efficient, must be capable of having a reasonably high throughput rate for the material processed and since MSW varies from one area to the next, and between collections, the separation system also must be capable of handling materials which vary widely in nature and composition. To the present, the throughput rates of conventional systems have not been adequately high enough to derive efficiencies permitting the use of equipment in municipalities of small or medium size. However, because of the ever-increasing rigid requirements for carrying out waste treatment and because of the increasing scarcity of landfill space, some technique must be found to effectively increase such output rates.
To achieve the efficient separation of more valuable fractions of MSW and to derive an environmentally safe marketable compost or refuse derived fuel product, a waste treatment process should be carried out wherein raw MSW is passed through a variety of reduction, separation, and related treatment stages. These stages serve to remove inorganic components such as metals, glass, and plastics from the organic component of the MSW. The segregated or separated by-product materials, such as ferrous and non-ferrous metals, glass, and plastic, increasingly are becoming valuable resources worthy of the expenditure of capital for effective separation equipment. Of course, the quality and resultant value of the organic material also is dependent upon the corresponding quality of separation, the presence of plastics, glass, or other foreign particles being undesirable or unacceptable for most commercial applications.
A broad variety of separation techniques have been known to industry. Among those, both manual and automatic techniques have been used. The manual technique that generally involves human pickers usually is not cost effective nor desirable. The automatic techniques which rely on the fraction size for sorting by a grizzly or the magnetic characteristics of the magnetic fraction or the density of other fractions for air separation generally have not been employed by industry in such a manner as to eliminate the extensive need of human pickers to further separate MSW into the various fractions where air separation techniques have been applied to municipal waste separation. Designers have found that achieving high quality separation within reasonable cost limits proves to be an elusive goal. Since MSW varies widely in geographical, as well as daily, make-up and consistency, a uniform product is not available for separation treatment. Therefore, any separation system involving the sorting of solid waste must be capable of handling a wide variation of waste components.
An improved bag splitting assembly is disclosed in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 5,267,823. This assembly finds good use in the solid waste sorting system disclosed in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 5,101,977. A preferred conveyor system for use in both the bag splitting assembly and the solid waste sorting system is disclosed in commonly-assigned U.S. Pat. No. 5,219,064. The disclosure of these patents is expressly incorporated herein by reference.
In particular, most home owners and businesses bag their grass clippings, leaves, tree branches, bush clippings, flowers and flower stalks, vegetable refuse, and similar compostable yard waste (hereinafter, collectively “yard waste”) in plastic bags and place such bagged yard waste for collection with their other refuse and garbage. The same is true in many communities where “curbside recycling” is practiced, i.e., separately bagging paper, newsprint, plastics, aluminum cans, etc. for recycling. Since such yard waste and some recyclables can be composted (as many home gardeners already practice) and/or other recyclables recycled for reuse, it would be beneficial to develop an automatic system that would free the yard waste, recyclables, and the like, from the plastic bags for processing of such yard waste. The same is true for the cans and bottles fraction that is segregated in separate plastic bags by curbside recycling efforts.
BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
Disclosed is an assembly for splitting open contents-filled garbage bags selected from bags filled with yard waste and bags filled with cans and bottles. The assembly is composed of a flighted conveyor that conveys the filled garbage bags into a confined bag splitter assembly. The bag splitter assembly has sidewalls to confine filled garbage bags therein and has an overhead array of blade assemblies laterally spaced across the conveyor for confronting filled garbage bags conveyed by said conveyor into the bag splitter assembly. The blade assemblies are composed of a pivotally mounted blade holder disposed above the conveyor and carry horizontally-disposed canard-like blades having a forward point for confronting the filled garbage bags. The blades are disposed substantially continuously laterally across the width of the bag splitter assembly. For garbage bags filled with cans and bottles, the blades have a forward tip carry pointed elongate elements for puncturing the bags.
A separation assembly for separating the split bags from their contents is located at the discharge end of the conveyor and is fitted with a first downward-sloping parallel bar assembly for permitting contents from the split bags to fall therethrough and for split bags to slide down said bar assembly and onto a rotating wheel array. The rotating wheel array has a rotating axle from which a plurality of spoked wheels are parallelly mounted, the outer circumference of the wheels bearing nibs for catching the split bags and urging their separation from the bags' contents.
The advantages and operating improvements in the handling of yard waste, e.g., for composting, will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art based on this disclosure. The same is true in the handling of cans and bottles, for example, for their recycle.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3606058 (1971-09-01), Davis
patent: 4216865 (1980-08-01), Dudley
patent: 5267823 (1993-12-01), Roman
patent: 5282713 (1994-02-01), Lande
patent: 5339961 (1994-08-01), Mayhak
pat
Mueller and Smith, LP
Nguyen Tuan N.
LandOfFree
Bag splitter and separation assembly does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Bag splitter and separation assembly, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Bag splitter and separation assembly will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2461303