Fluid handling – Processes – Cleaning – repairing – or assembling
Reexamination Certificate
2000-04-27
2002-02-26
Lee, Kevin (Department: 3753)
Fluid handling
Processes
Cleaning, repairing, or assembling
C137S614200, C137S454600, C137S613000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06349736
ABSTRACT:
The present invention is directed to double-check-valve backflow prevention devices and methods of fabrication, assembly and use and in particular to backflow prevention which provides integration of shut-off valves.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
Backflow prevention devices are devices configured to prevent or avoid flow of a liquid (typically water) in a direction opposite to normal-use flow directions. For example, backflow preventer devices may be installed between a municipal water supply and (all or portions of) a building's potable water system for the purpose of avoiding situations in which water within the building system might otherwise flow backwards into the municipal water system, potentially contaminating municipal water supplies. Backflow prevention can be of great importance in maintaining public health and safety and installation of backflow preventers is typically required by, e.g., building codes or other regulations, laws, etc.
A number of different kind of backflow prevention devices have been developed. Some devices are configured only for preventing a type of backflow that can result from gravity flow or siphoning in a backwards direction. These “anti-siphon” valves are often used in relatively less critical applications, such as in irrigation systems and may be implemented with a relatively inexpensive approach such as a pressure vacuum breaker (PVB) approach. Such PVB and/or anti-siphon devices are generally unsuitable for certain more critical application (e.g. connecting city water lines to a building) and typically (by statue, regulation, building code and the like) are not permitted to be used as backflow prevention devices for such critical applications.
In contrast, a more robust, reliable, often high-pressure, backflow prevention device is that known as a double-check-valve backflow preventer. Double check backflow prevention assemblies are described e.g. in publication 1015 of the American Society of Sanitary Engineers (ASSE) (Rev. 1993) incorporated herein by reference. In a double-check-valve backflow preventer, two valves are configured, typically in series, such that the valves are maintained open (against the urging of valve-closing springs or other devices). The double-check-valve backflow preventer is configured, however, such that if the pressure changes such that there could be a tendency for flow in the direction opposite to the normal or desired flow direction, one or both of the valve units will close, preventing such backflow. One example describing a double-check-valve backflow preventer arrangement is found in U.S. Pat. No. 5,107,888, incorporated herein by reference.
In some or all critical backflow prevention installations, there are additionally requirements to position two other valves, known as shut-off valves. In these situations, one shut-off valve is positioned upstream (from the point of view of normal flow direction) of the backflow preventer valves and another shut-off valve is positioned downstream of the backflow prevention valves. Shut-off valves can be useful, e.g., when it is necessary to perform inspection, maintenance, repair and/or replacement of a backflow preventer assembly or when it has been determined that a backflow preventer assembly has failed (or is in danger of failing), to avoid the risk of contamination.
In typical previous approaches, separate shut-off valve units were installed (often using a bolt and flange arrangement). Without wishing to be bound by any theory, it is believed that compliance with requirements for such upstream and downstream shut-off valves by installing separate shut-off valve units upstream and downstream of a preventer valve device has become common because shut-off valves are commonly used in situations in addition to backflow prevention and accordingly shut-off valves are available, for any of a number of different purposes in an “off the shelf” fashion. It is also believed (without wishing to be bound by any theory) that previous approaches which involve providing shutoff valves as separate units (with respect to the preventer assembly) were provided so that, in existing installations, the shut-off valves could be closed to permit ready isolation of the backflow preventer check valve (positioned between the two shut-off valves), e.g., for inspection, maintenance, repair, replacement and the like.
The common practice of (and, often, requirement for) installing separate shut-off valve units upstream and downstream of a preventer valve assembly is associated with a number of problems or disadvantages. The space requirements (including height requirements, width requirements, depth requirements and total volume requirements) in order to accommodate the separate shut-off valves and preventer valve assembly units can be undesirably large. This can be especially true when the shut-off valve is configured such that operation of the shut-off valves involves movement of handles or other control devices to a substantially new location, which must be accommodated when designing the space or volume which the shut-off valves will occupy. In some situations, including cold weather locations, separate enclosures must be provided for covering the backflow preventer valve/shut-off valve combination. In general, the cost of providing such separate enclosure is related to the enclosure volume and, accordingly, cost is increased by configurations having relatively large space or volume requirements.
Furthermore, the total weight of the backflow preventer valve/shut-off valve combination, including weight associated with flanges or other coupling devices, e.g., for coupling shut-off valves to backflow preventer valve assemblies, can provide an undesirable augmentation of costs, including costs of shipping, storage, installation and/or maintenance. Accordingly, it would be useful to provide a system apparatus and method to achieve compliance with backflow prevention design objectives and/or laws, codes or regulations while reducing space (height, width, depth and/or volume) requirements and/or weight of a backflow preventer/shut-off valve combination and preferably while still permitting at least some degree of inspection, maintenance, repair or replacement of backflow prevention components.
In some situations, it is found that backflow preventer assemblies are installed in the absence of one or both of the upstream and downstream shut-off valves, generally contravening good design practice and, usually, violating local codes, regulations, statues or the like. Accordingly, it would be useful to provide a system apparatus and method for backflow prevention which can substantially reduce or substantially eliminate the installation of backflow prevention assemblies in the absence of shut-off valves.
In previous approaches, provision of a backflow preventer assembly which was separate from upstream and downstream shut-off valves involved an undesirably lengthy installation procedure. In particular, in a typical situation, it was necessary to bolt a first shut-off valve flange to an inlet pipe flange, to bolt a first backflow preventer assembly flange to a second flange of the first shut-off valve, to bolt a first flange of a second shut-off valve to a second flange of the backflow preventer assembly, and to bolt a second flange of the second shut-off valve to an outlet pipe flange (not necessarily in that order). These steps also typically required positioning and alignment of various flanges while supporting the (often very heavy) shut-off valves and backflow preventer assemblies. Accordingly, it would be useful to provide a system method and apparatus which can reduce the cost and labor associated with installing a backflow preventer/shut-off valve combination.
Although, as noted above, shut-off valves are typically available “off the shelf” for use for numerous purposes, there can be undesirable costs associated with configurations which involve numerous separate parts. In previous approaches, the person designing, e.g., a building plumbing system, would need to spend time not only selecting, orde
CMB Industries, Inc.
Lee Kevin
Sheridan & Ross P.C.
LandOfFree
Backflow preventer apparatus and method with integration of... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Backflow preventer apparatus and method with integration of..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Backflow preventer apparatus and method with integration of... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2977848