Autosegmentation/autocontouring system and method for use with t

X-ray or gamma ray systems or devices – Specific application – Absorption

Patent

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

378 65, 382131, 382132, 600427, G01N 2304

Patent

active

058598910

ABSTRACT:
An autosegmentation/autocontouring method that may be used for quickly and accurately contouring the regions and boundaries around regions for the development of cross-sections that may be linearly disposed for the three-dimensional reconstruction of an image is described and claimed. The autosegmentation/autocontouring method includes at least four steps. The first step is to digitize a CT, MRI, or other suitable image and display it on a display screen. The two-dimensional image on the display screen will include gray-scale representations of the internal organs and tissue masses of the anatomical site through which the cross-section was made. The second step is to select the interior of a ROI and draw a polygon within the boundaries of the cross-sectional view of this ROI. This polygon could also be drawn in the interior of a cancerous mass or other diseased tissue. The third step of the method of the present invention is to expand the polygon in a novel manner by iteratively testing pixels of the image on the display outside of, but adjacent to, the pixels that the polygon currently subtends. Pixels will be added to the polygon if the value of a decision rule function has a predetermined value. The expansion of the polygon is continued until none of the pixels at the perimeter of the polygon can satisfy the decision rule. Once it is found that none of the perimeter pixels satisfy the decision rule, the perimeter of the polygon is considered the boundary of the ROI. And the fourth step is that the boundary of the ROI is computed and a contour is developed based on this boundary. This same process is repeated for other ROIs that the user may select.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4751643 (1988-06-01), Lorensen et al.
patent: 4764971 (1988-08-01), Sullivan
patent: 4791567 (1988-12-01), Cline et al.
patent: 4856074 (1989-08-01), Nagaoka
patent: 4961425 (1990-10-01), Kennedy et al.
patent: 5072384 (1991-12-01), Doi et al.
patent: 5133020 (1992-07-01), Giger et al.
patent: 5166876 (1992-11-01), Cline et al.
patent: 5185809 (1993-02-01), Kennedy et al.
patent: 5187658 (1993-02-01), Cline et al.
patent: 5204625 (1993-04-01), Cline et al.
patent: 5239591 (1993-08-01), Ranganath
patent: 5289374 (1994-02-01), Doi et al.
patent: 5319549 (1994-06-01), Katsuragawa et al.
patent: 5319551 (1994-06-01), Sekiguchi et al.
patent: 5410617 (1995-04-01), Kidd et al.
patent: 5412563 (1995-05-01), Cline et al.
patent: 5433199 (1995-07-01), Cline et al.
patent: 5452367 (1995-09-01), Bick et al.
patent: 5457754 (1995-10-01), Han et al.
patent: 5458126 (1995-10-01), Cline et al.
patent: 5491627 (1996-02-01), Zhang et al.
patent: 5517602 (1996-05-01), Natarajan
patent: 5531223 (1996-07-01), Hatanaka
patent: 5537485 (1996-07-01), Nishikawa et al.
patent: 5553207 (1996-09-01), Sekihuchi et al.
patent: 5566246 (1996-10-01), Rao
patent: 5570430 (1996-10-01), Sheehan et al.
patent: 5574799 (1996-11-01), Bankman et al.
patent: 5583659 (1996-12-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5590215 (1996-12-01), Allen
patent: 5669382 (1997-09-01), Curwen et al.
Delagnes et al., Active Contours Approach to Object Tracking in Image Sequences with Complex Background, Pattern Recognition Letters, vol. 16(2), pp. 171-178 (1995).
Fletcher et al., A Multispectral Analysis of Brain Tissues, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 29, pp. 623-630 (1993).
Miller et al., Mathematical Textbook of Deformable Neuroanatomies, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, vol. 90, pp. 11944-11948 (1993).
Staib et al., Boundary Finding with Parametrically Deformable Models, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 14, pp. 859-870 (1996).
Chakraborty et al., Deformable Boundart Finding in Medical Images by Integrating Gradient and Region Information, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 15, pp. 859-870 (1996).
McInerney et al., Deformable Models in Medical Image Analysis, Proceedings of Mathematical Methods Biomedical Image Analysis, pp. 171-180 (1996).
Giardina et al., Accuracy of Curve Approximation by Harmonically Related Vectors with Elliptical Loci, Computer Graphics and Image Processing, vol. 6, pp. 277-285 (1977).
Kuhl et al., Elliptic Fourier Features of a Closed Contour, Computer Graphics and Image Processing, vol. 18, pp. 236-258 (1982).
Wells et al., Adaptive Segmentation of MRI Data, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 429-442 (1996).
Cline et al.; Three-Dimensional Segmentation of MR Images of the Head using Probability and Connectivity; (1990); Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 14(6): pp. 1037-1045, no month.
Cline et al.; 3D Reconstruction of the Brain from Magnetic Resonance Images using a Connectivity Algorithm; (1987); Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 5: pp. 345-352, no month.
Cline et al.; Vascular Morphology by Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging; (1989); Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 7: pp. 45-54, no month.
Bezdek et al.; Review of MR Image Segmentation Techniques using Pattern Recognition; (1993); Medical Physics, vol. 20(4): pp. 1033-1048, no month.
DeCarli et al.; Method for Quantification of Brain, Ventricular, and Subarachnoid CSF Volumes from MR Images; (1992); Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 16(2): pp. 274-284, no month.
Hohne et al.; Interactive 3d Segmentation of MRI and CT Volumes using Morphological Operations; (1992); Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography, vol. 16(2): pp. 285-294, no month.
Kohn et al.; Analysis of Brain and Cerebrospinal Fluid Volumes with MR Imaging; (1991); Radiology, vol. 178: pp. 115-122, no month.
Neal et al.; Technical Note: Evaluation of a Region Growing Algorithm for Segmenting Pelvic Computed Tomography Images During Radiotherapy Planning; (1994): The British Journal of Radiology, vol. 67: pp. 392-395, no month.
Yin et al.; Comparison of Bilateral-Subtraction and Single-Image Processing Techniques in the Computerized Detection of Mammographic Masses; (1993); Investigative Radiology, vol. 28(6): pp. 473-481, no month.
Vaidyanathan et al.; Comparison of Supervised MRI Segmentation Methods for Tumor Volume Determination During Therapy: (1995); Magnetic Resonance Imaging, vol. 13(5): pp. 719-728, no month.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Autosegmentation/autocontouring system and method for use with t does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Autosegmentation/autocontouring system and method for use with t, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Autosegmentation/autocontouring system and method for use with t will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1522962

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.