Aeronautics and astronautics – Spacecraft – Spacecraft formation – orbit – or interplanetary path
Patent
1999-06-02
2000-07-18
Barefoot, Galen L.
Aeronautics and astronautics
Spacecraft
Spacecraft formation, orbit, or interplanetary path
244164, 244176, B64G 124
Patent
active
060895071
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of Invention
This invention relates generally to advanced orbit control and maintenance techniques for both individual satellites as well as for multiple satellites in a constellation, in which Modern Feedback Control is used for providing precise autonomous on-board navigation and control. The basic functions of this control system can place any satellite in any orbit position in a constellation, including the acquisition of the initial distribution for the constellation after satellite separation from launch vehicles, and can also maintain the constellation distribution, including station relocation and station keeping.
2. Description of Related Art
The orbital control of satellites, in both geostationary (GEO) and low-earth orbits (LEO), has primarily been ground-based. Orbit maintenance and station keeping have historically required involvement of Control Center personnel in all phases of operation. The computational burden for satellite control, including orbit analysis, maintenance and stationkeeping, has been on the ground computers. The ground computers provide both the off-line functions of orbit determination and maneuver planning as well as the on-line functions of commanding and telemetry processing.
Current geostationary satellite operations have evolved by taking advantage of the stationary nature of the satellite position relative to the ground stations. For example, the geostationary geometry provides a continuous window for ranging, tracking, and commanding, thereby minimizing the computational burden on the processors on-board the satellites. Low-earth orbit satellites have generally been equipped with more on-board processing capability than geostationary satellites to provide increased autonomy in navigation, command and control. This is because LEO satellites have intermittent ground station contacts of relatively short duration, resulting in limited ability to send commands to the satellites in real time.
The standard design for orbit control is based on the analysis of orbital mechanics, which provides the relationship among the orbital elements, orbit velocity changes and orbital behavior under the perturbing forces. Based on these relationships, orbit control is classified into individual control systems, for example, "orbit control", "orbit eccentricity control", "east-west position control", "drift or velocity drift control" and "orbit inclination control." These individual control laws reflect only partial relationships between individual orbit elements and control actions. However, while two-body orbit initial problem theory provides an analytical relationship between the six orbital elements, for example the semimajor axis (a), the eccentricity (e), the inclination (i), the right ascension of ascending node (.OMEGA.), the argument of perigee (.omega.), and the mean anomaly (M),and the initial state vector, this relationship is non-linearly coupled. When this coupling is neglected, the accuracy of any control system based on these individual models will be limited, and the efficiency of the control system will be low.
Various methods have been studied for control of satellite navigation.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,109,346 to Wertz discloses autonomous navigation control using Global Positioning Satellites (GPS) for orbit determination, and a method for providing orbital corrections. Because Wertz uses a non-feedback control system, this system is subject to unstructured uncertainty. Additionally, Wertz is limited to orbit and attitude determination. Furthermore, position finding using GPS is known, as described for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,667,203 to Counselman, III.
Historically, control systems were designed as proportional-integral-derivative (PID) compensators using a variety of frequency response techniques. However, the PID design requires trade-offs with conflicting design objectives such as the gain margin and closed-loop bandwidth until an acceptable controller is found. When the dynamics are complex and poorly modeled, or when the perform
REFERENCES:
patent: 4667203 (1987-05-01), Counselman, III
patent: 5109346 (1992-04-01), Wertz
patent: 5267167 (1993-11-01), Glickman
patent: 5374011 (1994-12-01), Lazarus et al.
patent: 5528502 (1996-06-01), Wertz
Maute, P. et al., "Autonomous Geostationary Stationkeeping System Optimization and Validation", Acta Astronautica, vol. 20, pp. 93-101 (1989).
Eckstein, M.C. and Leibold, A., "Autonomous Station Keeping of Geostationary Satellites" Spacecraft Pointing and Control, Agard-AG-260, pp. 7/1-28 (Nov. 1981).
Eckstein, M.C., Leibold, A., and Hechler, F., "Optimal Autonomous Stationkeeping of Geostationary Satellites", American Astronautical Society and AIAA Astrodymanics Specialist Conference, Lake Tahoe, NV, AAS Paper No. 81-206 (Aug. 3-5, 1981).
Martinez, Juan J., "Optimal Orbit Control For Station Keeping With The Multisatellite Support System (MSSS)", Proc. AOCS Conference, Noordwijk, ESA-SP-128 (1977).
Hubert, S. and Swale, J., "Stationkeeping of a Constellation of Geostationary Communications Satellites", AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Conference, Seattle, WA, AIAA-84-2042 (Aug. 20-22, 1984).
Potti, J., Mora, E.J., and Pasetti, A., "An Autonomous Stationkeeping Geostationary Telecommunications Satellites (An Artemis Based ASK System"), IAF 44.sup.th International Congress, IAF paper No. 93-041, Graz, Austria (Oct. 16-22, 1993).
Lowrie, L.J., "Autonomous Navigation Systems Technology Assessment", 17.sup.th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, New Orleans, LA, AIAA No. 79-0056 (Jan. 15-17, 1979).
Boltz, F.W., "Autonomous Orbital Navigation Using Kepler's Equation", AIAA Mechanics amd Control of Flight Conference, Anaheim, CA, AIAA No. 74-808 (Aug. 5-9, 1974).
Markley, F.L., "Autonomous Satellite Navigation Using Landmarks", Advances in the Astronautical Sciences, vol. 46, Part II, Astrodynamics, pp. 898-1010 (1981).
Collins, J.T., Dawson, S., and Wertz, J.R., "Autonomous Constellation Maintenance System", 10.sup.th Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites (Sep. 1996).
Isaac Kaminer et al., "Control of an Underwater Vehicle Using Hoo Synthesis", Proceedings of the 30.sup.th Conference on Decision and Control, Brighton, England, pp. 2350-2355, Dec. 1991.
B.A.C. Ambrosius, et al., "Application of the Global Positioning System for Hermes Rendezvous Navigation", Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 197-205, Jan.-Feb. 1993.
T. Lahdhiri et al., "LQG-LTR Pitch Attitude Control of an Earth-Orbiting Spacecraft", Proceedings of the 32.sup.nd Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 445-446, San Antonio, Texas Dec. 12, 1993.
W. Kang, "Control of Spacecraft via Nonlinear Hoo Method", Proceedings of the 33.sup.rd Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 921-925, Lake Buena Vista, FL Dec. 14, 1994.
T. Holzhu ter, "LQG Approach for the High-Precision Track Control of Ships", IEE Proceedings--Control Theory Appl., vol. 144, No. 2, pp. 121-127, Mar. 1997.
Parvez Shabbir Ahmed
Xing Guang-Qian
LandOfFree
Autonomous orbit control with position and velocity feedback usi does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Autonomous orbit control with position and velocity feedback usi, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Autonomous orbit control with position and velocity feedback usi will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2027861