Land vehicles: bodies and tops – Bodies – Body securing device
Reexamination Certificate
2002-08-05
2003-06-17
Patel, Kiran (Department: 3612)
Land vehicles: bodies and tops
Bodies
Body securing device
C296S068100, C280S806000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06578894
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
The present invention relates to a vehicle occupant protection system for improving the crash safety of the vehicle.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In recent years, motor vehicles have been often fitted with a pretensioner device which positively increases the tension of the seat belt for restraining the vehicle occupant at the time of a crash and improves the protection of the vehicle occupant. The deceleration acting on the vehicle occupant who is restrained to the seat by a restraint device such as a seat belt starts rising only when the forward inertia force acting on the vehicle occupant at the time of the crash has started to be supported by the seat belt. As it is not possible to eliminate a certain amount of resiliency and slack in the seat belt, the deceleration of the vehicle occupant reaches a peak level only when the vehicle occupant has moved forward a certain distance under the inertia force and the elongation of the seat belt has reached its maximum extent. The peak value of the deceleration of the vehicle occupant gets greater as the forward displacement of the vehicle occupant under the inertia force increases, and is known to be substantially larger than the average deceleration of the passenger compartment of the vehicle body.
When the relationship between the vehicle body deceleration and the vehicle occupant deceleration is compared to the relationship between the input and output of a system consisting of a spring (vehicle occupant restraint device) and a mass (mass of the vehicle occupant), it can be readily understood that the maximum elongation and time history of the spring are dictated by the waveform (time history) of the vehicle body deceleration. Therefore, it can be concluded that the waveform of the vehicle body deceleration should be controlled in such a manner that not only the average deceleration acting on the vehicle body is reduced but also the overshoot of the vehicle occupant deceleration due to the elongation of the spring (vehicle occupant restraint device) is minimized.
In the conventional vehicle body structure, the impact energy is absorbed by a crushable zone, consisting of an impact reaction generating member such as side beams and gaps defined between various components, provided in a front part of the vehicle body, and the waveform of the vehicle body deceleration is adjusted by changing the resulting reaction properties by means of the selection of the dimensions and deformation properties of such parts. The deformation mode of the vehicle body other than the passenger compartment at the time of a crash may also be appropriately selected so that the deceleration of the passenger compartment of the vehicle body may be reduced, and the deformation may be prevented from reaching the passenger compartment. Such vehicle body structures are proposed in Japanese patent laid open publication (kokai) No. 07-101354.
It is important to note that the injury to the vehicle occupant at the time of a vehicle crash can be minimized by reducing the maximum value of the acceleration (deceleration) acting on the vehicle occupant which is dictated by the waveform (time history) of the vehicle body deceleration. It is also important to note that the total amount of deceleration (time integration of deceleration) which the vehicle occupant experiences during a vehicle crash is fixed for the given intensity of crash (or vehicle speed immediately before the crash). Therefore, as shown in
FIG. 6
for instance, the ideal waveform (time history) of the vehicle body (seat) deceleration (G
2
) for the minimization of the vehicle occupant deceleration (G
1
) should consist of an initial interval (a) for producing a large deceleration upon detection of a crash, an intermediate interval (b) for producing an opposite deceleration, and a final interval (c) for producing an average deceleration.
The initial interval allows the vehicle occupant to experience the deceleration from an early stage so that the deceleration may be spread over an extended period of time, and the peak value of the deceleration to be reduced. According to a normal vehicle body structure, owing to the presence of a crushable zone in a front part of the vehicle and a slack and elongation of the restraint system such as a seat belt, it takes a certain amount of time for the impact of a crash to reach the vehicle occupant. The delay in the transmission of deceleration to the vehicle occupant must be made up for by a subsequent sharp rise in deceleration according to the conventional arrangement. The final interval corresponds to a state called a ride-down state in which the vehicle occupant moves with the vehicle body as a single body. The intermediate interval is a transitional interval for smoothly connecting the initial interval and final interval without involving any substantial peak or dip in the deceleration. Computer simulations have verified that such a waveform for the vehicle body deceleration results in a smaller vehicle occupant deceleration than the case of a constant deceleration (rectangular waveform) for a given amount of deformation of the vehicle body (dynamic stroke).
According to the conventional vehicle body structure, the vehicle body components of the crushable zone start deforming from a part having a relatively small mechanical strength immediately after the crash, and a part thereof having a relatively high mechanical strength starts deforming thereafter. As a result, the waveform of the crash reaction or the vehicle body deceleration is small in an early phase, and then gets greater in a later phase so that the vehicle occupant deceleration cannot be adequately reduced. To eliminate such a problem, it has been proposed to obtain a prescribed amount of reaction force by making use of the collapsing of the side beams and to maintain a stable reaction by providing a plurality of partition walls in the side beams (Japanese patent laid-open publication (kokai) No. 07-101354). However, such previous proposals can only maintain the vehicle body deceleration at an approximately constant level at most, and are unable to provide a more effective deceleration waveform.
To minimize the adverse effect of the resiliency of the seat belt, it is known to provide a pretensioner device in association with the seat belt to positively tension the seat belt at the time of a vehicle crash. According to another previously proposed structure, at least one of the anchor points of the seat belt is attached to a member which undergoes a movement relative to the remaining part of the vehicle which tends to increase the tension of the seat belt in an early phase of a vehicle crash. Such devices are beneficial in reducing the maximum level of deceleration acting on the vehicle occupant at the time of a vehicle crash, but a device capable of more precise control of the vehicle occupant deceleration is desired.
Referring to
FIG. 9
, the vehicle occupant deceleration G
1
and vehicle body deceleration G
2
correspond to the input and output of a transfer function representing a two-mass spring-mass system consisting of the mass Mm of a vehicle occupant, a spring (such as a seat belt), and a vehicle body mass Mv. More specifically, the vehicle body deceleration G
2
can be given as a second-order differentiation of the coordinate of the vehicle body mass Mv with respect to time.
However, in an actual automotive crash, if a three-point seat belt is used, the shoulder belt portion of the seat belt which can be considered as a spring engages the chest of the vehicle occupant corresponding to the center of the vehicle occupant mass Mm so that the shoulder belt portion can be considered as consisting of two springs, one extending between the chest and shoulder anchor, the other extending between the chest and the buckle anchor.
If the seat belt is entirely incorporated to the seat, the shoulder anchor and buckle anchor move as a single body, and the two parts experience an identical deceleration. In such a case, it can be assumed that the seat belt can be given as a composite of two spr
Arent Fox Kintner & Plotkin & Kahn, PLLC
Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
Patel Kiran
LandOfFree
Automotive vehicle occupant protection system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Automotive vehicle occupant protection system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Automotive vehicle occupant protection system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3115252