Incremental printing of symbolic information – Ink jet – Controller
Reexamination Certificate
2002-08-06
2004-01-06
Meier, Stephen D. (Department: 2853)
Incremental printing of symbolic information
Ink jet
Controller
C347S037000, C400S059000, C074S81300L
Reexamination Certificate
active
06672696
ABSTRACT:
INTRODUCTION
The present invention relates generally to hardcopy mechanisms, and more particularly to a subsystem of a hardcopy mechanism which changes state in response to movement of a service station member, and in the illustrated hardcopy printing mechanism embodiment, to a subsystem which adjusts printhead-to-media spacing in a printzone to accommodate different media (e.g. paper) thicknesses in response to movement of the service station member to provide high quality images on varying thickness of media.
Inkjet printing mechanisms use cartridges, often called “pens,” which shoot drops of liquid colorant, referred to generally herein as “ink,” onto a page. Each pen has a printhead formed with very small nozzles through which the ink drops are fired. To print an image, the printhead is propelled back and forth across the page, shooting drops of ink in a desired pattern as it moves. The particular ink ejection mechanism within the printhead may take on a variety of different forms known to those skilled in the art, such as those using piezo-electric or thermal printhead technology. For instance, two earlier thermal ink ejection mechanisms are shown in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,278,584 and 4,683,481, both assigned to the present assignee, Hewlett-Packard Company. In a thermal system, a barrier layer containing ink channels and vaporization chambers is located between a nozzle orifice plate and a substrate layer. This substrate layer typically contains linear arrays of heater elements, such as resistors, which are energized to heat ink within the vaporization chambers. Upon heating, an ink droplet is ejected from a nozzle associated with the energized resistor. By selectively energizing the resistors as the printhead moves across the page, the ink is expelled in a pattern on the print media to form a desired image (e.g., picture, chart or text).
To clean and protect the printhead, typically a “service station” mechanism is mounted within the printer chassis so the printhead can be moved over the station for maintenance. For storage, or during non-printing periods, the service stations usually include a capping system which hermetically seals the printhead nozzles from contaminants and drying. Some caps are also designed to facilitate priming, such as by being connected to a pumping unit that draws a vacuum on the printhead. During operation, clogs in the printhead are periodically cleared by firing a number of drops of ink through each of the nozzles in a process known as “spitting,” with the waste ink being collected in a “spittoon” reservoir portion of the service station. After spitting, uncapping, or occasionally during printing, most service stations have an elastomeric wiper that wipes the printhead surface to remove ink residue, as well as any paper dust or other debris that has collected on the printhead. While earlier, more primitive servicing mechanisms were operated in response to printhead movement, the newer more advanced servicing mechanisms often employ a separate service station motor which operates to move the servicing members between their rest and servicing positions.
As a preliminary matter, there is a term of art used by inventors skilled in this art that will speed the reading if used herein, and it is “pen-to-paper spacing,” often abbreviated as “PPS” or “PPS spacing.” In the English language of the inventor, “pen-to-paper spacing” or “PPS” is easier to pronounce than the more technically explicit term “media-to-printhead spacing,” and for this reason the terms “PPS” or “pen-to-paper spacing” are used herein. During prototype testing and development, inventors use vast amounts of media, so the most plentiful and economical media, plain paper is used. Indeed, the short-hand term “pen-to-paper spacing” is a logical selection of terminology, although it must be understood that as used herein, this term encompasses all different types of media, unless specified otherwise in describing a particular type of media. Thus, “pen-to-paper spacing” (PPS) defines the spacing between the inkjet cartridge printhead and the printing surface of the media, which may be any type of media, such as plain paper, specialty paper, card-stock, fabric, transparencies, foils, mylar, etc.
Having dispensed with preliminary matters, the discussion of the problems encountered in this art in maintaining an accurate PPS now continues. For instance, there are variations in the thickness of the print media which affect the PPS spacing. For example, envelopes, poster board and fabric are typically thicker than plain paper or a transparency. Thicker media decreases the spacing from the printhead to the printing surface, and in the worst case, this reduced spacing could lead to contact of the printhead with the media, known as a “printhead crash,” possibly damaging either the printhead or the image.
The earliest printing mechanisms used a constant printhead-to-media spacing, ignoring the media thickness and sacrificing print quality when thicker medias, such as envelopes or other media thicker than plain paper were printed upon. Unfortunately, one danger in ignoring printhead to paper spacing was the potential for suffering a printhead crash. To prevent printhead crashes, and subsequent printhead damage, as well as potentially ruining the print job, one prior solution provided a “user-switch” for adjusting PPS spacing. These user operable PPS adjustments required users to turn a knob, or push a lever to increase the PPS for better print quality when printing on thicker media. Unfortunately, in these user switchable systems, most users either never understood the switch, or never knew the switch existed, and if they did, they rarely if ever used it, so they continually obtained disappointing outputs when switching between different thicknesses of media. Furthermore, even if consumers were aware of the user switchable PPS adjustment feature, and they did use it, the switch still requires an extra user intervention step in the printing process which would be desirable to eliminate to provide a more user-friendly product.
Normally to improve printing speed, known as “throughput” measured in pages per minute, print quality is unfortunately sacrificed. Tests have shown that faster print speeds may be obtained, along with higher print quality, if the PPS spacing is reduced. One of the main stopping blocks to reducing PPS spacing lower than current levels is that envelopes, as well as other thicker print media, do not feed well through a nominal plain paper PPS spacing without smearing against the printheads. Thus, it would be desirable to have an automatic way to switch between two different printhead to platen separations, a large one for thicker media and small one for regular plain paper media, as well as transparencies, premium papers, and photo media.
Indeed, it would be desirable to provide more than two different PPS spacings to accommodate different types of specialty media. For example, plain papers often swell during printing as they soak up the liquid from the ink composition, a problem in the art often referred to as “cockle” where the media actually begins to buckle. Thus, for printing on plain papers the PPS spacing must be larger to avoid printhead crashes into upwardly bowed portions of the paper. In contrast, when printing upon various premium and photo medias, including transparencies, typically very little ink is absorbed into the media, so cockle is not a problem, allowing closer PPS spacings to be used. Closer PPS spacings are typically associated with yielding higher print quality, so in printing upon these specialty medias which are immune to cockle, it would be desirable to have a closer PPS spacing than when printing on plain paper. Indeed, as the various types of print media change, with different swelling characteristics and thicknesses, a variety of different spacings between the media support platen and the printhead may be desirable to accommodate these varying different thicknesses and cockle characteristics. Furthermore, as mentioned above it would be desirable to have th
Donley Allan D.
Fairchild Michael A.
Hewlett--Packard Development Company, L.P.
Mouttet Blaise
LandOfFree
Automatic printhead-to-media spacing adjustment system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Automatic printhead-to-media spacing adjustment system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Automatic printhead-to-media spacing adjustment system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3233794