Data processing: database and file management or data structures – Database design – Data structure types
Reexamination Certificate
2000-10-25
2003-10-28
Alam, Hosain T. (Department: 2172)
Data processing: database and file management or data structures
Database design
Data structure types
C707S793000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06640229
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to the field of knowledge management and, more specifically, to managing a user knowledge profile within a database.
BACKGROUND
The new field of “knowledge management” (KM) is receiving increasing recognition as the gains to be realized from the systematic effort to store and export vast knowledge resources held by employees of an organization are being recognized. The sharing of knowledge broadly within an organization offers numerous potential benefits to an organization through the awareness and reuse of existing knowledge, and the avoidance of duplicate efforts.
In order to maximize the exploitation of knowledge resources within an organization, a knowledge management system may be presented with two primary challenges, namely (1) the identification of knowledge resources within the organization and (2) the distribution and accessing of information regarding such knowledge resources within the organization.
In addition, an organization may also wish to determine and store the knowledge characteristics of third-parties, such as customers, to use as a resource for targeting a market. Such third-party knowledge resources are particularly useful for the global marketplace in which e-commerce is a growing factor.
The identification, capture, organization and storage of knowledge resources is a particularly taxing problem. Prior art knowledge management systems have typically implemented knowledge repositories that require users manually to input information frequently into pre-defined fields, and in this way manually and in a prompted manner to reveal their personal knowledge base. However, this approach suffers from a number of drawbacks in that the manual entering of such information is time consuming and often incomplete, and therefore places a burden on users who then experience the inconvenience and cost of a corporate knowledge management initiative long before any direct benefit is experienced. Furthermore, users may not be motivated to describe their own knowledge and to contribute documents on an ongoing basis that would subsequently be re-used by others without their awareness or consent. The manual input of such information places a burden on users who then experience the inconvenience and cost of a corporate knowledge management initiative long before any direct benefit is experienced.
It has been the experience of many corporations that knowledge management systems, after some initial success, may fail because either compliance (i.e., the thoroughness and continuity with which each user contributes knowledge) or participation (i.e., the percentage of users actively contributing to the knowledge management system) falls to inadequate levels. Without high compliance and participation, it becomes a practical impossibility to maintain a sufficiently current and complete inventory of the knowledge of all users. Under these circumstances, the knowledge management effort may never offer an attractive relationship of benefits to costs for the organization as a whole, reach a critical mass, and the original benefit of knowledge management falls apart or is marginalized to a small group.
In order to address the problems associated with the manual input of knowledge information, more sophisticated prior art knowledge management initiatives may presume the existence of a centralized staff to work with users to capture knowledge bases. This may however increase the ongoing cost of knowledge management and requires a larger up-front investment before any visible payoff, thus deterring the initial funding of many an otherwise promising knowledge management initiatives. Even if an initial decision is made to proceed with such a sophisticated knowledge management initiative, the cash expenses associated with a large centralized knowledge capture staff may be liable to come under attack, given the difficulty of quantifying knowledge management benefits in dollar terms.
As alluded to above, even once a satisfactory knowledge management information base has been established, the practical utilization thereof to achieve maximum potential benefit may be challenging. Specifically, ensuring that the captured information is readily organized, available, and accessible as appropriate throughout the organization may be problematic.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
A knowledge management system automatically manages profile terms in a user profile by moving profile terms from a private portion of the user profile to a public portion. An agent in the system selects certain profile terms in the private portion and moves the selected terms to the public portion. Additionally, the selected terms can be further filtered to determine which will be moved. Optionally, the owner of the user profile may also specify an treatment option for each profile term that controls whether the term is always moved or never moved to the public portion of the profile. A additional treatment option causes the agent to alert the owner when a term is selected and to give the owner the choice of moving the term to the public portion at that point.
In one aspect, the agent selects the profile terms based on a confidence value for each term. The confidence value is representative of a contextual characteristic of the profile term within an electronic document. The further filtering can also be based on the confidence value.
Because the user maintains control over the criteria used by the agent in publishing the profile terms, users will be more likely to utilize the agent to automatically publish profile terms rather than having to continually decide which terms should be published. Thus, the invention increases the public knowledge resources of the organization without over-burdening the user.
The present invention is described in terms of systems, clients, servers, methods, and computer-readable media of varying scope. In addition to the aspects and advantages of the present invention described in this summary, further aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent by reference to the drawings and by reading the detailed description that follows.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4914586 (1990-04-01), Swinehart et al.
patent: 4970681 (1990-11-01), Bennett
patent: 5051891 (1991-09-01), MacPhail
patent: 5247575 (1993-09-01), Sprague et al.
patent: 5247661 (1993-09-01), Hager et al.
patent: 5251131 (1993-10-01), Masand et al.
patent: 5276869 (1994-01-01), Forrest et al.
patent: 5333237 (1994-07-01), Stefanopoulos et al.
patent: 5473732 (1995-12-01), Chang
patent: 5488725 (1996-01-01), Turtle et al.
patent: 5493729 (1996-02-01), Nigawara et al.
patent: 5513126 (1996-04-01), Harkins et al.
patent: 5530852 (1996-06-01), Meske, Jr. et al.
patent: 5541836 (1996-07-01), Church et al.
patent: 5555426 (1996-09-01), Johnson et al.
patent: 5586218 (1996-12-01), Allen
patent: 5608900 (1997-03-01), Dockter et al.
patent: 5628011 (1997-05-01), Ahamed et al.
patent: 5659731 (1997-08-01), Gustafson
patent: 5659732 (1997-08-01), Kirsch
patent: 5692107 (1997-11-01), Simoudis et al.
patent: 5704017 (1997-12-01), Heckerman et al.
patent: 5717914 (1998-02-01), Husick et al.
patent: 5717923 (1998-02-01), Dedrick
patent: 5720001 (1998-02-01), Nguyen
patent: 5724567 (1998-03-01), Rose et al.
patent: 5727129 (1998-03-01), Barrett et al.
patent: 5754938 (1998-05-01), Herz et al.
patent: 5794210 (1998-08-01), Goldhaber et al.
patent: 5802518 (1998-09-01), Karaev et al.
patent: 5835087 (1998-11-01), Herz et al.
patent: 5855008 (1998-12-01), Goldhaber et al.
patent: 5867799 (1999-02-01), Lang et al.
patent: 5892909 (1999-04-01), Grasso et al.
patent: 5913212 (1999-06-01), Sutcliffe et al.
patent: 5931907 (1999-08-01), Davies et al.
patent: 5950200 (1999-09-01), Sudai et al.
patent: 5974412 (1999-10-01), Hazlehurst et al.
patent: 5995597 (1999-11-01), Woltz et al.
patent: 5999932 (1999-12-01), Paul
patent: 5999975 (1999-12-01), Kittaka et al.
patent: 6006200 (1999-12-01), Boies et al.
patent: 6006221 (1999-12-01), Liddy et al.
patent: 6014644 (2000-01-01), Erickson
patent: 6021439 (2000-02-01)
Epelman-Wang Hernan
Gilmour David L.
Goldberg Jonathan M.
Sanders Richard
Wang Eric
Alam Hosain T.
Tacit Knowledge Systems, Inc.
LandOfFree
Automatic management of terms in a user profile in a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Automatic management of terms in a user profile in a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Automatic management of terms in a user profile in a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3114784