Automatic location determination of devices under test

Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system – Remote supervisory monitoring

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C702S183000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06477486

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND
This invention is related generally to building computer systems and more particularly to the preparation of build-to-order computer systems.
This application relates to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/919,959, filed on Aug. 29, 1997, entitled Software Installation and Testing For A Build-To-Order Computer System, naming Richard D. Amberg, Roger W. Wong and Michael A. Brundridge, as inventors. The co-pending application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and is assigned to the assignee of this invention.
This application relates to co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/921,438, filed on Aug. 29, 1997, entitled Database For Facilitating Software Installation And Testing For A Build-To-Order Computer System, naming Richard D. Amberg, Roger W. Wong and Michael A. Brundridge as inventors. The co-pending application is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, and is assigned to the assignee of this invention.
Many methods have been devised for tracking inventory. In U.S. Pat. No. 5,434,775, the locations of a plurality of devices are tracked using a network of communication links, each of which corresponds to a location. Each device is given a tag that identifies the device with respect to other devices and that is connectable to a communication link when the device is disposed at the location to which the link corresponds. Each tag that is connected to each communication link is detected, and the location of each device is determined based on the detection. One feature of the technique is additionally determining the conditions of the devices by correlating one or more communication links with conditions. The technique is simple to use and a highly effective technique in tracking devices stored at various locations throughout a facility. Device location and condition are monitored continuously, thereby reducing the risk that the removal of a device from storage will go undetected.
A present trend among some computer manufacturers is to provide a customer with a custom-built computer system in which the customer has designated that certain components and capabilities be included in the system being ordered. It is therefore important to maximize efficiency at every step of the build-to-order process. That efficiency begins at the time the order is placed and processed, and continues throughout the assembly, testing and shipment of the custom-built unit.
During production of build-to-order computer systems, specific parts for a computer are pulled from stock and taken to an assembly pod where those specific parts are assembled in the computer chassis. Following assembly, the chassis is moved to a quick-test area where tests are conducted to quickly determine whether the correct parts for that order are installed, and whether the parts are operative.
Following the quick test procedure, assembled chassis are moved to a burn rack where the parts are “burned in” and where operational errors may be detected. Many units are simultaneously tested on the burn racks and the tests may take a couple of hours to complete. With many units in production waiting to be tested, it is important that the burn rack spaces available for testing are used efficiently. Therefore, it is important that the computers or devices under test (DUT) are tested in a manner which quickly and efficiently determines whether a DUT is satisfactorily operational and if not, which quickly and efficiently identifies operational deficiencies so that the DUT may be removed from the burn rack to free up the occupied burn rack space for another DUT to be tested.
When a DUT is on the burn rack, the software ordered with the system is also downloaded to the DUT from a server. Personnel monitor the burn rack test units for visual and audible indications, i.e. LED's and beeps, of how the testing and downloading procedures are progressing. A red LED indication accompanied by an audible beep indicates a failed DUT which is returned to quick test where it is thoroughly tested by a technician. A green LED indication means that a unit is ready to be moved on to a final test to check the screen and the operating system prior to shipping the unit.
When software downloading is to be accomplished, the DUT is identified to the server for download of the appropriate software. Each DUT is identified by a lifetime identifier (serial number) in the form of a bar code. When the DUT is on the burn rack, its physical location is also identified by a rack, a column on the rack and a row in the column. Each burn rack location is serviced by a location specific cable and a network device which interconnects the cable to the DUT. However, although the cable can only service a specific rack location, the network device can and does sometimes become detached from one cable and attached to another. Each network device has a MAC address which is mapped to a location in terms of the rack, the column and the row. The mapping information is stored in a database in the network environment. The DUT can communicate with the database. As a result, the exact location of the DUT can be determined. Therefore, if the connector is moved to a different rack location and is connected to another cable, the information in the database will be inconsistent with the exact location of the DUT.
Therefore, what is needed is a burn rack monitoring system which enables manufacturing to pinpoint and track the physical location of each DUT so that each device can be located for correction in the event of a test failure, and to assure that devices which test successfully are shipped to the correct customer.
SUMMARY
On embodiment accordingly, provides an automatic means for determining the location of a DUT device by mapping a DUT, connected to a simple network management protocol (SNMP) enabled network, to a physical location. As a result, a device and method are provided to track a DUT during the manufacturing process. To this end, a burn rack test device includes several workcells. An SNMP switch device is provided adjacent the burn rack. The switch device includes several ports. A plurality of cables are provided such that a respective cable interconnects a respective port of the switch device and a respective workcell. A monitor is provided adjacent the burn rack. The monitor is connected to a port of the switch device.
The principal advantages of these embodiments are that DUT's being manufactured may be tracked throughout the build process on the burn racks. This permits optimum usage of the burn rack space and saves wait time for systems which need to be loaded onto the burn racks. In addition, it is possible to estimate the length of time required to test DUT's on the burn racks. Also, the ease of tracking DUT's helps to consolidate all systems belonging to one large order for efficient shipping and delivery.


REFERENCES:
patent: 4636725 (1987-01-01), Santomango et al.
patent: 4706208 (1987-11-01), Helms
patent: 4737953 (1988-04-01), Koch et al.
patent: 4761747 (1988-08-01), Guader
patent: 4866714 (1989-09-01), Adams et al.
patent: 5060068 (1991-10-01), Lindstrom
patent: 5341363 (1994-08-01), Hirasawa
patent: 5434775 (1995-07-01), Sims et al.
patent: 5457729 (1995-10-01), Hamann et al.
patent: 5461624 (1995-10-01), Mazzola
patent: 5513188 (1996-04-01), Parker et al.
patent: 5557559 (1996-09-01), Rhodes
patent: 5581600 (1996-12-01), Watts et al.
patent: 5680585 (1997-10-01), Bruell
patent: 5689604 (1997-11-01), Janus et al.
patent: 5708654 (1998-01-01), Ardant et al.
patent: 5774695 (1998-06-01), Autrey et al.
patent: 5784516 (1998-07-01), Parzygnat et al.
patent: 5861882 (1999-01-01), Sprenger et al.
patent: 5862040 (1999-01-01), Adnan
patent: 5889470 (1999-03-01), Kaycee et al.
patent: 5903698 (1999-05-01), Poremba et al.
patent: 5913037 (1999-06-01), Spofford et al.
patent: 5914609 (1999-06-01), Curry et al.
patent: 5919248 (1999-07-01), Kahkoska et al.
patent: 5954832 (1999-09-01), LeBlanc
patent: 5956719 (1999-09-01), Kudo et al.
patent: 5982753 (1999-11-01), Pendleton et al.
patent: 599

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Automatic location determination of devices under test does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Automatic location determination of devices under test, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Automatic location determination of devices under test will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2988193

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.