Automated storage library with multiple independent robots

Dynamic magnetic information storage or retrieval – Record transport with head stationary during transducing – Tape record

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C369S030390

Reexamination Certificate

active

06570734

ABSTRACT:

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to robotic mechanisms that manipulate media cartridges in an automated media cartridge storage library subsystem, and in particular, to a fully redundant system that includes a plurality of independent robots in the form of robotic pods. The robotic pods are concurrently operational on a vertical wall of media cartridge storage cells and media cartridge players to both transport selected media cartridges among the media cartridge storage cells and media cartridge players and perform other library system tasks.
PROBLEM
It is a problem in automated media cartridge storage library subsystems to serve the media cartridge mount requests that are received from an associated host processor in a timely and efficient manner. Existing automated media cartridge storage library subsystems (library systems) are capable of storing and retrieving large quantities of information that are stored on media cartridges. This is accomplished by the use of a large number of cartridge storage cells, each of which houses a single media cartridge, that are housed within an enclosure. Such library systems utilize a robotic mechanism, such as a robotic arm, to quickly move the media cartridges between their media cartridge storage cells and media cartridge players. For example, to retrieve information that is stored on a selected media cartridge, the robotic arm is moved to a location opposite the media cartridge storage cell that houses the selected media cartridge. An end effector of the robotic arm then grasps the media cartridge and extracts it from the media cartridge storage cell. The robotic arm then repositions itself from the media cartridge storage cell to a media player, where the end effector loads the media cartridge into the media player.
The problem with this architecture is that the robotic arm must wait for the previously mounted media cartridge to be dismounted and put away. The media cartridge mount cycle requires exclusive use of the robotic arm, even though another requested mount cycle may be waiting in a queue for the robotic arm to become available. A reduction in usable duty cycle is also incurred if the robotic arm is requested to move media cartridges from a library system loading window to their assigned media cartridge storage cells or the robotic arm passes media cartridges between library enclosures.
A further problem with existing library systems is that a single robotic arm system requires expensive mechanics to maintain reliability levels common to the high duty cycle of the industry, and an inoperable robotic arm shuts down the complete system for repair. Single arm library systems, as typified in U.S. Pat. No. 5,143,193 have been improved to provide redundant robotic mechanisms in order to mitigate the effects of these problems. For example, a double end effector is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,907,889 to thereby allow a single robotic arm to simultaneously carry two media cartridges or to survive the loss on one of the end effectors. The library design of U.S. Pat. No. 5,456,569 has two independent end effectors and two vertical moveable means to provide even more redundancy. The two robot system of U.S. Pat. No. 4,937,690 shows how two complete robotic arms can overlap in a common robotic space. A method with multiple accessors is disclosed in the design of U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,199 whereby each accessor is semi-independent of the others to move multiple media cartridges at once. These designs show improved methods of incorporating multiple robotic arms and/or multiple segments of the robotic arms into a given library space.
A further problem is that library system activities are constantly interrupted by overhead tasks. The storage library contents are typically monitored with label readers incorporated on the robotic arm, and the service of the robotic arm is required in such cases where label reading is required. Also, robotic arm positioning within the robotic space is usually accomplished with an optical or other locating device that is mounted on the robotic arm, requiring that the robotic arm be used solely to calibrate the position of the end effector with respect to the media cartridges. Label reading and calibration are time consuming tasks which impact the duty cycle of a library system. Robotic arm calibration is necessary to ensure positional accuracy, and a large robotic arm may have extensive calibration devices on board the robotic arm, adding to the cost and weight of the robotic arm. The typical robotic arm and its supporting structure requires several servo motors to move the robotic arm between positions. Each move of the robotic arm requires a time interval after the mechanism has stopped to bring the servo position into a steady state. The servo mechanism settling time depends on the stiffness of the robotic arm and can represent a substantial portion of the total robotic duty cycle. Large robotic arms with poor stiffness have longer settling times than small stiff robotic arms. The moving mass of the robotic arm is much greater than the media cartridge being moved. It is common practice to reduce mass through the use of high-technology materials, although technological advances in materials do not give an adequate cost/performance solution to this problem. The moving mass of the robotic arm also relates directly to power consumption, which is an important factor in large installations. A large storage library may take up a considerable amount of floor space, primarily due to the robotic arm design. The typical design utilizes a large swept space for the robotic arm, while the media volumetric space is only a fraction of the total space occupied by the library system. The larger the robotic arm, the more volume taken as the robotic arm is moved about during operation. A large space is also used if the media cartridges are stored in a horizontal plane rather than a vertical plane. Vertically oriented storage walls of media cartridges are preferred over horizontal storage due to the fact that floor space is at a premium while room space is often available in the vertical direction. The system of U.S. Pat. No. 5,395,199 shows a horizontal storage array that covers a computer room floor, but does not make use of the rest of the space above the floor. In addition, vertical media storage planes accommodate an operator in between media cartridge storage walls during maintenance, without compromising operation of a multi-library system.
SOLUTION
The above described problems are solved and a technical advance achieved by the present automated library system that contains multiple independent robots for concurrently manipulating multiple media cartridges. The library system comprises a two-dimensional array that contains media cartridge storage cells and media cartridge players. A system of rails is used to guide robotic pods through all of the locations in the array, which eliminates the need for any steering or guide mechanism on board the robotic pods, resulting in a reduction in the mass of the robotic pods. The rail system also constrains the movement of the robotic pods into horizontal and vertical movements, thereby simplifying the control algorithms for collision avoidance that are required by a typical random moveable object handling system based on horizontal, vertical and diagonal degrees of freedom. The robotic pods contain a moveable carriage that is capable of transporting robotic components, such as media cartridge pickers, bar code reading devices, and other task oriented sub-modules, in the storage library rail system. For example, the robotic pod carriage assemblies can be fitted with maintenance devices, monitoring instruments or cleaning apparatus to give added flexibility to the rail system architecture.
The rail system is implemented with a rack and pinion type drive gear interface, rather than a rubber tire type friction drive, to thereby allow for improved traction and increased operating speeds of the robotic pods. Such a drive system can be integrated with position sensing encoders tha

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Automated storage library with multiple independent robots does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Automated storage library with multiple independent robots, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Automated storage library with multiple independent robots will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3057893

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.