Authentication techniques in a monitoring system

Communications: electrical – Condition responsive indicating system – Specific condition

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C340S005270

Reexamination Certificate

active

06844816

ABSTRACT:
An Electronic House Arrest Monitoring (EHAM) system of the present invention includes a transmitter attached to a monitored offender and a receiver positioned in the vicinity of the desired monitoring location. The transmitter and the receiver each have a pattern stored or generated therein for determining the interval of time between signal transmissions and receptions. The pattern is pseudo-random to offer improved protection against imposter transmitters, in other words the time intervals are selected to be unequal and randomly varying but the pattern is repeated or cycled to allow continuing signal transmission by the transmitter. The transmitter transmits signals at varying time intervals according to this pattern, and the receiver authenticates signals it receives as coming from the monitored transmitter based on the expected time intervals from the pattern. The pattern may include any number of time intervals and, in one embodiment, includes more than one subpattern to extend the length of the repeat cycle to increase the difficulty of defeating the monitoring system. As further protection against imposter devices, the receiver may verify the signals based on information unique to the transmitter included in each signal. The receiver may further use the received signals and unique time interval patterns to determine a number of operating states, including New Transmitter ID Received, Transmitter In Range and Locked to Transmitter, Transmitter In Range and Not Locked, Transmitter Out of Range, and Imposter Likely. The monitoring system may also include a remote host computer linked to the receiver or receivers to enable these operating states to be monitored remotely by enforcement personnel.

REFERENCES:
patent: 4734680 (1988-03-01), Gehman et al.
patent: 4761778 (1988-08-01), Hui
patent: 4918432 (1990-04-01), Pauley et al.
patent: 4952913 (1990-08-01), Pauley et al.
patent: 4952928 (1990-08-01), Carroll et al.
patent: 4980671 (1990-12-01), McCurdy
patent: 4990892 (1991-02-01), Guest et al.
patent: 5023901 (1991-06-01), Sloan
patent: 5032823 (1991-07-01), Bower et al.
patent: 5117222 (1992-05-01), McCurdy et al.
patent: 5146207 (1992-09-01), Henry et al.
patent: 5182543 (1993-01-01), Siegel et al.
patent: 5189395 (1993-02-01), Mitchell
patent: 5204670 (1993-04-01), Stinton
patent: 5255306 (1993-10-01), Melton et al.
patent: 5266944 (1993-11-01), Carroll et al.
patent: 5369699 (1994-11-01), Page et al.
patent: 5383134 (1995-01-01), Wrzesinski
patent: 5537102 (1996-07-01), Pinnow
patent: 5627524 (1997-05-01), Fredrickson
patent: 5661458 (1997-08-01), Page et al.
patent: 5745037 (1998-04-01), Guthrie et al.
patent: 5898230 (1999-04-01), Bartel
patent: 5933098 (1999-08-01), Haxton
patent: 5959533 (1999-09-01), Layson, Jr. et al.
patent: 5969595 (1999-10-01), Schipper
patent: 6040770 (2000-03-01), Britton
patent: 0 344 138 (1989-11-01), None
patent: 0 575 753 (1993-12-01), None
patent: 2 186 404 (1987-08-01), None
“Code Hopping Encoder Product Brief,”Microchip HCS301,DS40136A, Microchip Technology Incorporated, Chandler, Arizona, 1996.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Authentication techniques in a monitoring system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Authentication techniques in a monitoring system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Authentication techniques in a monitoring system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3414106

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.