Auditing compliance with a hippocratic database

Details Auditing compliance with a hippocratic database Auditing compliance with a hippocratic database

2005-03-21

2010-10-05

Vu, Kimyen (Department: 2435)

Information security

Access control or authentication

Network

C707S608000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07810142

ABSTRACT:
An auditing framework for determining whether a database disclosure of information adhered to its data disclosure policies. Users formulate audit expressions to specify the (sensitive) data subject to disclosure review. An audit component accepts audit expressions and returns all queries (deemed “suspicious”) that accessed the specified data during their execution.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5557742 (1996-09-01), Smaha et al.
patent: 5982890 (1999-11-01), Akatsu
patent: 6070244 (2000-05-01), Orchier et al.
patent: 6134664 (2000-10-01), Walker
patent: 6243816 (2001-06-01), Fang et al.
patent: 6321338 (2001-11-01), Porras et al.
patent: 6327574 (2001-12-01), Kramer et al.
patent: 6363391 (2002-03-01), Rosensteel, Jr.
patent: 6405318 (2002-06-01), Rowland
patent: 6408391 (2002-06-01), Huff et al.
patent: 6480850 (2002-11-01), Veldhuisen
patent: 6546389 (2003-04-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 6585778 (2003-07-01), Hind et al.
patent: 6647400 (2003-11-01), Moran
patent: 6668325 (2003-12-01), Collberg et al.
patent: 6694303 (2004-02-01), Agrawal et al.
patent: 6757699 (2004-06-01), Lowry
patent: 6804787 (2004-10-01), Dick
patent: 6810395 (2004-10-01), Bharat
patent: 6948064 (2005-09-01), Smith et al.
patent: 7028338 (2006-04-01), Norris et al.
patent: 7146359 (2006-12-01), Castellanos
patent: 7167892 (2007-01-01), Defosse et al.
patent: 7171379 (2007-01-01), Menninger et al.
patent: 7284274 (2007-10-01), Walls et al.
patent: 7296155 (2007-11-01), Trostle et al.
patent: 7305707 (2007-12-01), Mattsson
patent: 7315826 (2008-01-01), Guheen et al.
patent: 7386151 (2008-06-01), Moritz
patent: 7506364 (2009-03-01), Vayman
patent: 2001/0025346 (2001-09-01), Kayashima et al.
patent: 2002/0178374 (2002-11-01), Swimmer et al.
patent: 2004/0049693 (2004-03-01), Douglas
patent: 2004/0111639 (2004-06-01), Schwartz et al.
patent: 2004/0172558 (2004-09-01), Callahan et al.
Agrawal et al., “Auditing Compliance with a Hippocratic Database,” Proceedings of the 30thInternational Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Toronto Canada, Sep. 2004, 12pgs.
Agrawal et al., “Hippocratic Databases,” Proceedings of the 28thInternational Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Hong Kong, China, Aug. 2002, 12 pgs.
Malvestuto et al., Computational Issues Connected with the Protection of Sensitive Statistics by Auditing Sum-Queries, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Scientific and Statistical Database Management, Capri, Italy, Jul. 1-3, 1998, pp. 134-144.
Jensen et al., “Incremental Implementation Model for Relational Databases with Transaction Time,” IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, V3, N4, Dec. 1991, pp. 461-473.
Lefevre et al., “Limiting Disclosure in Hippocratic Databases,” Proceedings of the 30thInternational Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Toronto Canada, Sep. 2004, pp. 108-119.
Sellis, “Multiple-Query Optimization,” ACM Transactions on Database Systems, V13, N1, Mar. 1988, pp. 23-52.
Chen et al. “NiagaraCQ: A Scalable Continuous Query System for Internet Databases,” Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Dallas, Texas, May 14-19, 2000, pp. 379-390.
Eswaran et al, “The Notions of Consistency and Predicate Locks in a Database System,” Communications of the ACM, V19, N11, Nov. 1976, pp. 624-633.
Nanda et al., Oracle Privacy Security Auditing: Includes Federal Law Compliance with HIPAA, Sarbanes-Oxley & the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act GLB, Rampant Techpress, Dec. 2003, pp. 574-578, 613-618.
Ryutov et al. “The Specification and Enforcement of Advanced Security Policies,” Proceedings of the Third International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks, Monterey, California, Jun. 5-7, 2002, 11pgs.
Database Management Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA, p. 229.
“The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) Specification,” <http://www.w3.org/TR/P3P/>, 130 pgs.

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Auditing compliance with a hippocratic database does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Auditing compliance with a hippocratic database, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Auditing compliance with a hippocratic database will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-4241423