Attribute scoring for unstructured content

Data processing: presentation processing of document – operator i – Presentation processing of document – Layout

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C707S793000, C707S793000, C707S793000

Reexamination Certificate

active

10241982

ABSTRACT:
The present invention provides for a system and method of assigning attribute scores, including those for abstract and diverse concepts such as sentiment (e.g., happiness, anger, sadness) to documents containing unstructured content (natural language content). Such content may include, but is not limited to, Web pages, e-mails, word processing documents, computer logs, chat logs, audio files, graphical images, text files, books, magazines, articles, etc. The attributes that are scored are specialized views of the unstructured content. Accordingly, attribute scoring denotes the processes of assigning one or more new measures to a document containing unstructured content. The attribute score or measure indicates the degree of the attributes found within the document.

REFERENCES:
patent: 5197005 (1993-03-01), Shwartz et al.
patent: 5321833 (1994-06-01), Chang et al.
patent: 5371807 (1994-12-01), Register et al.
patent: 5418948 (1995-05-01), Turtle
patent: 5659731 (1997-08-01), Gustafson
patent: 5694559 (1997-12-01), Hobson et al.
patent: 5799268 (1998-08-01), Boguraev
patent: 5905980 (1999-05-01), Masuichi et al.
patent: 5974415 (1999-10-01), Schreiber
patent: 6006225 (1999-12-01), Bowman et al.
patent: 6012053 (2000-01-01), Pant et al.
patent: 6070169 (2000-05-01), Shorter
patent: 6073130 (2000-06-01), Jacobson et al.
patent: 6167397 (2000-12-01), Jacobson et al.
patent: 6175843 (2001-01-01), Muramoto et al.
patent: 6212528 (2001-04-01), Brophy et al.
patent: 6216123 (2001-04-01), Robertson et al.
patent: 6240407 (2001-05-01), Chang et al.
patent: 6269364 (2001-07-01), Kennedy et al.
patent: 6327589 (2001-12-01), Blewett et al.
patent: 6356899 (2002-03-01), Chakrabarti et al.
patent: 7039631 (2006-05-01), Finger, II
patent: 2001/0016846 (2001-08-01), Chakrabarti et al.
patent: 2002/0032682 (2002-03-01), Kobayashi et al.
patent: 2002/0032772 (2002-03-01), Olstad et al.
patent: 2002/0059228 (2002-05-01), McCall et al.
patent: 2002/0129015 (2002-09-01), Caudill et al.
patent: 2004/0078386 (2004-04-01), Moon et al.
patent: 2005/0055346 (2005-03-01), Perisic et al.
patent: 2006/0143175 (2006-06-01), Ukrainczyk et al.
patent: 2006/0184521 (2006-08-01), Ponte
Sholom M. Weiss, A system for real-time competitive market intelligence, ACM Press, 2002, pp. 360-365.
“Verity Search: The Advantages of Advanced Information Retrieval,” Nov. 2000, Verity, Inc., 15 pages.
Glover, E.J., et al., “Web Search—Your Way,”Communications of the ACM, (preprint), pp. 1-9.
Goldman, R., et al., “Proximity Search in Databases,”Proceedings of the 24th VLDB Conference, New York, 1998, pp. 26-37.
Jónsson, B., et al., “Interaction of Query Evaluation and Buffer Management for Information Retrieval,” University of Maryland, AT&T, undated, 12 pages.
Labrinidis, A., et al., “WebView Materialization,”Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Confer4ence on Management of Data, Dallas, Texas, May 14-19, 2000, pp. 367-378.
Liu, Y.K., et al., “Finding Descriptions or Definitions of Words on the WWW,” source: Department of Information Studies, University of Sheffield, Sep. 2000, pp. 1-74.
Mangisengi, O., et al., “A Multidimensional Modeling Approach for OLAP within the Framework of the Relational Model based on Quotient Relations,” Institute of Software Technology, Technical University of Vienna, 1999, pp. 40-46.
Natsev, A., et al., “Aggregate Predicate Support in DMBS,” IBM Watson Research Center, 30 pages.
Pedersen, T.B., et al., “Extending OLAP Querying To External Object Databases,” CIKM, McLean, VA, 2000, pp. 405-413.
Pourabbas, E., et al., “Characterization of Hierarchies and Some Operations in OLAP Environment,” Istituto di Analisi dei Sistemi ed Informatica, Rome, Italy, pp. 54-59.
Rizvi, S., “Information Retrieval from Structured and Semi-Structured Databases,” Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Bombay, 35 pages.
Schwartz, M., et al., (workshop co-chairs), “Distributed Indexing/Searching Workshop,” agenda, attendee list, and position papers, World Wide Web Consortium, May 28-29, 1996, pp. 1-87.
Shoshani, A., “OLAP and Statistical Databases: Similarities and Differences,”PODS, 1997, pp. 185-196.

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Attribute scoring for unstructured content does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Attribute scoring for unstructured content, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Attribute scoring for unstructured content will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3797095

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.