Joints and connections – With adjunctive protector – broken parts retainer – repair,... – Position or guide means
Reexamination Certificate
2001-05-02
2003-07-01
Swann, J. J. (Department: 3677)
Joints and connections
With adjunctive protector, broken parts retainer, repair,...
Position or guide means
C403S014000, C403S410000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06585442
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to attachment mechanisms and, more particularly, relates to an attachment mechanism capable of retaining a pair of members and simultaneously translating and rotating the members relative to each other.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Advancements in technology have made it possible to design and fabricate microsatellites (i.e. less than 100 kg in size) with the same level of performance as conventional satellites. The lower cost and weight of these microsatellites relative to conventional satellites has provided many additional uses for these microsatellites that were previously cost prohibitive. By reducing the weight of these satellites, low cost airborne launching methods can replace the costly, time inflexible, ground launches.
An important application of microsatellites is the ability to dock with larger satellites currently in orbit to repair, upgrade, or replenish the expendables of these more expensive satellites. Traditional docking mechanisms generally require precise alignment of the two satellites along three axes to effect reliable engagement, which increases the cost and complexity of the docking system on each satellite. However, with the occasional interruption of communication with these satellites, it is preferable that the docking of these satellites occur autonomously to insure satellite capture and minimize the human control requirements. This autonomous docking would insure that a satellite is not lost due to power failures or actuation failures. This further allows the docking mechanism to be powered down prior to satellite capture to reduce power consumption.
It is also preferable that the surface engagement between the various satellites occur independent of the approaching microsatellites relative position, orientation, and angle of incidence. Moreover, the required force for surface engagement should be minimized to reduce the risk of the satellite “bouncing off” during the engagement process. However, the retention force should be maximized to prevent premature separation, which could result in the loss of the microsatellite. Still further, it is preferable to be able to actively translate, manipulate, rotate, and the like, one satellite relative to the other to effect a proper capture and dock. Accordingly, there exists a need to provide a simple and convenient method of docking a microsatellite with an existing satellite that is capable of generating relative motion therebetween while maintaining positive attachment.
Generally, the need to provide a simple and convenient attachment mechanism transcends satellite-type applications. That is, there exists a particular need to provide an attaching mechanism that is capable of maintaining positive attachment while translating one member relative to another member in many different industries and environments, such as manufacturing, exploration, etc.
Accordingly, there exists a need in the relevant art to provide an attachment mechanism that is capable of actively retaining a first member to a second member. Furthermore, there exists a need in the relevant art to provide an attachment mechanism that is capable of actively retaining a first member to a second member while simultaneously generating relative motion therebetween. Still further, there exists a need in the relevant art to provide an attachment mechanism that is capable of overcoming the disadvantages of the prior art.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
According to the teaching of the present invention, an attachment mechanism having an advantageous construction is provided. The attachment mechanism includes a first attachment member supported by a first body. The first attachment member includes an engaging portion. A plurality of second attachment members is also provided and is supported by a second body. Each of the plurality of second attachment members includes an engaging portion selectively engageable with the engaging portion of the first attachment member. An actuating device is further provided and coupled with the plurality of second attachment members. The actuation device is operable to selectively actuate the plurality of second attachment members relative to the first attachment member to positionally manipulate the first body relative to the second body while the plurality of second attachment members is engaged with the first attachment member.
Further areas of applicability of the present invention will become apparent from the detailed description provided hereinafter. It should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating the preferred embodiment of the invention, are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.
REFERENCES:
patent: 3279863 (1966-10-01), Boulandon et al.
patent: 4399675 (1983-08-01), Erdmann et al.
patent: 5206557 (1993-04-01), Bobbio
patent: 5962949 (1999-10-01), Dhuler et al.
patent: 6070656 (2000-06-01), Dickey
patent: 6075924 (2000-06-01), Will
Ataka M., Omodaka A., Takeshima N., Fujita H., “Fabrication and Operation of Polyimide Bimorph Actuators for a Ciliary Motion System,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Dec. 1993, vol. 2, No. 4, pp 146-150.
Bohringer K.F., Donald B.R., Kavraki L.E., Lamiraux F., “Part Orientation with One or Two Stable Equilibria Using Programmable Force Fields,” IEEE Transactions on Robiotics and Automation, Apr. 2000, vol. 16, No. 2, pp 157-170.
Bohringer K.F., Donald B.R., MacDonald N.C., “Programmable Force Fields for Distributed Manipulation, with Applications to MEMS Actuator Arrays and Vibratory Parts Feeders,” The International Journal of Robotics Research, Feb. 1999, vol. 18, No. 2, pp 168-200.
Bohringer K.F., Donald B.R., MacDonald N.C., “What Programmable Vector Fields Can (and Cannot) Do: Force Field Algorithms for MEMS and Vibratory Plate Parts Feeders,” Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Minneapolis, MN, Apr. 1996, pp 822-829.
Bohringer K.F., Donald B.R., Mihailovich R., MacDonald N.C., “A Theory of Manipulation and Control for Microfabricated Actuator Arrays,” Proceedings of the 1994 IEEE Workshop on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Jan. 25-28, 1994, pp 102-107.
Bohringer K.F., Suh J.W., Donald B.R., Darling R.B., Kovacs G.T.A., “Vector Fields for Task-level Distributed Manipulation: Experiments with Organic Micro Actuator Arrays,” Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Albuquerque, NM, Apr. 20-25, 1997, vol. 2, pp 1779-1786.
Carter P., Naghdy F., Laszlo N., Cook C.D., Wong P., “Study of Actuator Technologies for a Miniature Distributed Manipulation Environment,” pp 661-665.
Clement J. W., Brei D. E. “Proof-of-Concept Investigation of Active Velcro For Smart Attachment Mechanisms,” 42nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference and Exhibit Technical Papers, Seattle, WA, Apr. 16-19, 2001, pp 1-11.
Ebefors, T., Mattsson, J.U., Kalvesten, E., Stemme, G., “A Robust Micro Conveyor Realized by Arrayed Polyimide Joint Actuators,” Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, Jan. 17-21, 1999, pp 576-581.
Fujita H., Konishi S., Furuhata T., Takeshima N., “A Proposal for a Conveyance System with Parallel Cooperative Micro Modules,” pp 656-660.
Furuhata T., Hirano T., Fujita H., “Array-Driven Ultrasonic Mictoactuators—Arrayed microactuator modules that have swing pins—,” 1991 IEEE, pp 1056-1059.
Iizuka T., Fujita H., “Precise Positioning of a Micro Conveyor Based on Superconducting Magnetic Levitation,” Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE International Symposium on Micromechatronics and Human Science, Oct. 5-8, 1997, pp 131-135.
Konishi S., Fujita H., “A Conveyance System Using Air Flow Based on the Concept of Distributed Micro Motion Systems,” Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, Jun. 1994, vol. 3, No. 2, pp 54-58.
Langlet P., Collard D., Akiyama T., Fujita H., “A Quantitative Analysis of Scratch Drive Actuation for Integrated X/Y Motion System,” 1997 Intern
Alexander Paul W.
Brei Diann E.
Clement Joseph W.
Deyer Christopher W.
Harness & Dickey & Pierce P.L.C.
Rodriguez Ruth C.
Swann J. J.
The Regents of the University of Michigan
LandOfFree
Attachment mechanism does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Attachment mechanism, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Attachment mechanism will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3078888