Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing – Biological cellular material tested
Reexamination Certificate
1999-12-13
2002-06-25
Wallenhorst, Maureen M. (Department: 1743)
Chemistry: analytical and immunological testing
Biological cellular material tested
C436S064000, C436S813000, C435S029000, C435S371000, C600S306000, C600S310000, C600S556000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06410333
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
(a) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to the assessment of ultraviolet radiation UV effects on sunscreen-treated and non-treated human skin using a more sensitive technique. In particular, the Invention relates to:
the production of human skin substitutes containing keratinocytes, melanocytes, fibroblasts and dermal extracellular matrix;
the protection of human skin surface with a sunscreen using standard quantity (2 ml/cm
2
);
the irradiation of these treated and non-treated skin substitutes using UVA, UVB and simulated sunlight ultraviolet sources;
the analyses of the sunscreen effects on non-irradiated cutaneous cells and extracellular matrix; and
the analyses of he harmful effects of these UV irradiations on skin structure and the photo-induced DNA damage before and after sunscreen protection.
(b) Description of Prior Art
A sunny day generally puts people in a very good mood. Indeed, all of us look forward to outdoor activities in summer. Outdoor activities mainly depend on warm and sunny weather conditions. The sun seems to be innocuous for the vast majority of the world's population. In fact, the sun simply provides life-sustaining heat, light and energy. However, solar irradiation causes a large variety of harmful effects including photoaging and skin cancers (Preston D S et al., 1992,
N. Engl. J. Med.,
327:1649-1662).
The sun is the main source of UV radiation (Young A R, 1990,
Semin. Dermatol.,
9(1) :25-31). The broad spectrum and intensity of UV light from the sun are due to the high temperature on the earth's surface and its size. The intensity of solar UV reaching the earth is certainly highly dangerous and would probably be lethal to the majority, if not all living organisms on the earth's surface, without the shielding afforded by ozone layer. The UV solar spectrum is divided into three categories.
Ultraviolet-C (UVC) radiation ranges from 200 to 280 nm and is completely absorbed by the earth's ozone layer. Ultraviolet-B (UVB) radiation ranges from 280 to 320 nm. A significant amount is absorbed by the ozone layer. This type of radiation causes most sunburn, redness and skin cancer. Ultraviolet-A (UVA) radiation ranges from 320 to 400 nm. As opposed to UVC and UVB, very little of this UVA radiation is absorbed by the ozone layer. The UVA dose reaching the earth is 100 to 1,000 times higher than UVB radiation (Frederick J E et al., 1989,
Photochem. Photobiol.,
51:443-450).
Skin is exposed to UV radiations from birth to death. Although, there are few beneficial effects of exposure to UV light, most of their effects are deleterious to human skin and eyes (Kligman A M, 1969,
JAMA,
210:2377-2380). The harmful effects of sunlight exposure result in erythema, accelerated skin aging, pigmentation anomalies, actinic keratosis, immunosuppression, DNA damage and skin cancers (Preston D S et al., 1992,
N. Engl. J. Med.,
327:1649-1662; Garmyn M et al., 1995,
Dermatology,
190:305-308; Jeevan A et al., 1993,
The Lancet,
342:1159-1161). Basic and clinical literature have incriminated both UVA and UVB on these different skin pathologies. Efforts to increase scientific knowledge regarding the photobiologic effects of UV light on the skin are important and relevant to both prevention and treatment of many human skin diseases.
The increasing need for sun protection agents to be used by the general population around the world has become evident over the last decade. In a population that spends more recreational time in the sun, there is a growing awareness regarding the protection of these people against the harmful effects of UV. The use of sunscreen designed to protect them has increased dramatically in the past decades (Stern R S et al., 1986,
Arch Dermatol.,
122:537-545). The generally accepted parameter for evaluating the efficacy of sunscreen preparations against UV radiation is the sun protection factor (SPF) (Jarratt M et al., 1983,
J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.,
9:354-362). The endpoint for the determination of a sunscreen SPF is the appearance of erythema which is related to protection against sunburn. The erythemal phase is evaluated 24 hrs following the irradiation protocol and calculated using the below defined formula:
SPF
=
&AutoLeftMatch;
Minimal
erythema
dose
(
J
/
cm
2
)
in
sunscreen
protected
skin
Minimal
erythema
dose
(
J
/
cm
2
)
in
non
-
sunscreen
protected
skin
UVB radiations are most effective for producing tanning as well as erythema (Pathak M, 1985,
Ann. NY Acad. Sci.,
453:328-339) and SPF values reflect the degree of protection against this UVB radiation. Recently produced sunscreens cover a wider UV spectrum to protect skin from ultraviolet irradiation including UVA. The evaluation of a sunscreen efficacy is based on SPF method. However, for different reasons this method cannot be used successfully as an endpoint in determining the efficacy of a sunscreen for blocking the UVA harmful effects.
UVA necessitate prolonged exposure period to initiate erythema in normal skin. To use the erythemal reaction as an indication of effectiveness against UVA radiation and to expedite the determination, the skin must be sensitized by the application of a phototoxic chemical prior to exposure to the UVA radiation. Since many of these chemicals are carcinogenic, using this technique is presently prohibited for ethical reasons (Groves A G, 1990, In
Sunscreens Development, evaluation, and regulatory aspects
(eds) Nicholas J Lowe and Nadim A Shaath. Marcel Dekker, inc New York:411-420).
Other possible endpoints for evaluating UV protection and basically UVA protection include immediate and delayed pigmentation. Immediate pigment darkening (IPD) is an oxygen-dependent photochemical reaction of melanin or its precursors in existing melanosomes (Beitner H, 1988,
Photodermatology,
5:96-100). The response is a gray-brown pigmentation which appears during or immediately after irradiation and fades over a period ranging from a few minutes to a few hours (Kaidbey K H et al., 1978,
J. Invest. Dermatol.,
72:253-256). Delayed pigmentation (tanning) represents proliferation of melanocytes and increased production of melanosomes.
However, to get a complete efficacy against UVA and UVB radiations, the sunscreen must protects also against photoaging, DNA damage and skin cancers (Lowe J N et al., 1980,
J. Invest. Dermatol.,
74:181-182; Freeman S E et al., 1988,
Photodermatology,
5:243-247).
The sunscreen predictive actions are generated using human volunteers (Lowe J N et al., 1980,
J. Invest. Dermatol.,
74:181-182). Unfortunately, these evaluations were costly, difficult and suspicious upon the development of hyperpigmented areas subsequent to UV exposure (Bridges B et al., 1980,
Nature,
283:523-524).
To overcome these limitations, experimental models (rats, mice, etc.) were used for photodermatological studies (Wolf P et al., 1993,
J. Invest. Dermatol.,
101:523-527). Despite many similarities, the use of animal skin to elucidate mechanisms of UV-induced damage in human cutaneous tissues is hampered by inherent biological differences. Consequently, scientists are still looking for the appropriate model to:
1—understand the different mechanisms involved in skin damage after UV radiation,
2—be used for sunscreen testing;
3—be used as a more sensitive and effective method for UV harmful effect assessment and sunscreen efficacy concerning skin cancer prevention.
Regarding the third point, as the erythemal phase is due to the penetration into the skin of an important UV radiation dose which induces an inflammatory reaction first, and then erythema. Our concern is that prior to the suberythemal phase, UV radiation has already caused histological perturbations to the skin and DNA damage to the cutaneous cells (keratinocytes, melanocytes, etc.)
Claveau Joël
Drouin Régen
Rhainds Marc
Rouabhia Mahmoud
Cawthorne Christian
Côté France
Renault Ogilvy
Universite Laval
Wallenhorst Maureen M.
LandOfFree
Assessment of human skin damage following exposure to... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Assessment of human skin damage following exposure to..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Assessment of human skin damage following exposure to... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2961134