Data processing: measuring – calibrating – or testing – Measurement system – Remote supervisory monitoring
Reexamination Certificate
1998-10-26
2001-08-21
Shah, Kamini (Department: 2857)
Data processing: measuring, calibrating, or testing
Measurement system
Remote supervisory monitoring
C717S152000, C717S152000, C717S152000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06278960
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The invention relates to an assembly for remote control and/or remote operation of a field device by means of a controller via a field bus.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
In industrial production systems field devices are in use as a rule in a wealth of positions which can be remotely controlled or operated from a central location via a field bus. “Field devices” is the general term designating sensors and actuators employed in systems in which industrial processes are run. Such field devices may be pressure gauges with the aid of which the pressure in a container can be measured and monitored. However, temperature gauges may also be involved with the aid of which the temperature can be monitored at a desired location in the process sequence. A level sensor may also be put to use as a field device for monitoring the level in a container. Increasing use is being made of smart devices as field devices which offer substantially more possibilities of application than more conventional devices for data acquisition. Smart field devices are capable of not only processing the acquired data, they also make it possible to engineer the parameters of the field devices with the aid of e.g. a pc-based controller incorporated at the central location or also by means of a portable controller via the field bus in on-line or even off-line operation. For example, depending on the requirements a variety of design data values or also limiting values of measuring data as well as range data values can be transmitted via the field bus to the field devices. To achieve this functionality a description of the field device parameters is required for the application program stored in the field device. This description can be viewed as an eighth layer of the OSI layer model created as a standard description of a network architecture for which various so-called device description languages (DDLs) are defined which can be employed for this purpose. These device description languages describe not only the attributes of the field device parameters but also the dependencies or relationships between the parameters and attributes.
However, the approach described hitherto for remote control and remote operation of field devices by working with device description languages has numerous drawbacks. There is no assurance that the device description (DD) produced for a field device in using one of the languages correctly describes the functionality of the device. For complex field devices it is extremely difficult to produce a device description which is consistent with the functionality of the parameters of the field device, there being to date no tool available with the aid of which the device code can be converted into a device description or for producing the device code from a device description. Device description languages exist in great variety, specific to certain controllers, this meaning that a dedicated device description needs to be written for each combination of field device and controller. As soon as a new device is to be put to use or the software of an existing device needs to be updated this usually involves the device description needing to be updated which then has to be transferred to the controller. This is usually done by entering the updated device description into the controller with the aid of a diskette which can easily lead to version problems.
A simplified example of an assembly of the aforementioned kind is shown in FIG.
1
. The field device
101
is provided with a memory
102
in which a processor-specific binary code is stored. This binary code is generated usually with the aid of an assembler/C source code from one or more data files
103
and processing in an assembly, a compiler and a linker, these programs being dictated in a block
104
. In the field device
101
the binary code is then processed in a suitable processor
105
. The controller
108
connected to the field device
101
via the field bus
106
consists of a universal part designated the DD shell and work surface
109
. In addition the controller contains a flexible field device specific part
110
into which the DD code can be entered. This DD code represents the functionality specific to the field device in each case. The DD code is e.g. a dynamic link library (DLL), and is entered into the flexible part
110
via a diskette
113
. The DD code is generated by a DD compiler
112
operating with application of one or more DD source data files
111
. The transmission of the device parameters between the field device
101
and the controller
108
, as indicated by the arrows
107
, is handled by the field bus
106
.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
The invention is based on the object of providing an assembly of the aforementioned kind which obviates the drawbacks as described above.
This object is achieved by the features as set forth in claim
1
.
Programming the field device application in a programming language, the compiler of which generates a platform-independent program code and using a microprocessor capable of processing this code results in a field device capable of executing a platform-independent code. By inserting the parameter attributes and the dependencies or relationships in a software architecture responsible for separating the system functionality and the closely hardware-related functionality of the field device, and by adding a possibility for transferring the program code representing the parameters in the controller this platform-independent program code can be processed in the controller. It is now no longer necessary by using such a method to write field device data files for the field device, and the field device has access to a consistent device functionality ensuring error-free operation.
REFERENCES:
patent: 5542082 (1996-07-01), Solhjell
patent: 5875335 (1999-02-01), Beard
patent: 5935249 (1999-08-01), Stern et al.
patent: 5958013 (1999-09-01), King et al.
patent: 5966540 (1999-10-01), Lister et al.
patent: 5987256 (1999-11-01), Wu et al.
patent: 6009517 (1999-12-01), Bak et al.
patent: 6011916 (2000-01-01), Moore et al.
patent: 196 15 190 (1997-10-01), None
patent: 0 489 227 (1992-06-01), None
patent: 3-84700 (1991-04-01), None
patent: 4170824 (1992-06-01), None
patent: 6-331398 (1994-12-01), None
patent: WO 97/39393 (1997-10-01), None
Nikkei Electronics, Jul. 14, 1997 (No. 694), pp 200-201 (With English Language Translation).
Nikkei Computer, Jun. 24, 1996 (No. 394), pp. 128-129.
Nikkei Computer, Jul. 10, 1995 (No. 369), pp. 75-76.
Pinkowski, Gunter, “Instrumentation throughout the times from smart technology to a manufacturer independent man-machine interface”, 8130 ATP Automatisierungstechnische Praxis, 6/92, No. 6, pp. 325-327.
Pinkowski, Gunter, “Blo&bgr; nichts Spezielles!”, 312 Elektrotechnik fuer die Automatisierung, Nov. 20, 1995,No. 11, pp. 26-31.
Bose McKinney & Evans LLP
Bui Bryan
Endress + Hauser GmbH + Co.
Shah Kamini
LandOfFree
Assembly for remote control and/or remote operation of a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Assembly for remote control and/or remote operation of a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Assembly for remote control and/or remote operation of a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2468978