Stock material or miscellaneous articles – Hollow or container type article – Polymer or resin containing
Reexamination Certificate
2000-04-17
2003-10-07
Rice, Kenneth R. (Department: 3627)
Stock material or miscellaneous articles
Hollow or container type article
Polymer or resin containing
C428S035700, C428S036500, C428S036910, C180S308000, C024S270000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06630217
ABSTRACT:
TECHNICAL FIELD
This invention relates an assembly utilized with tarpaulin coverings, for large articles such as, boats, automobiles, motorcycles, trailers, tents and the like. This is particularly applicable when such covered articles are stored outside in exposure to the elements, such as sun, wind, snow or rain and where protection of the equipment is desired.
BACKGROUND
Flexible sheets of water repellant material, commonly called tarpaulins, have been used for centuries to protect surfaces which are prone to weathering. A common use is to cover a boat which is not in use. Sometimes the boat will be covered for an entire season, such as the winter. Tarpaulins are also used to protect many other small vehicles, including automobiles, motorcycles, snowmobiles, lawn tractors, and so on. Sometimes tarpaulins are used in lieu of walls, such as for the walls of a flatbed truck or railroad car, or even a tent or small garage.
Tarpaulins are generally made of natural or synthetics fibers and can be rubberized,containing treated or untreated fibers and can be made waterproof by impregnating them with various water proofing agents such as silicones, as well as variety of natural or synthetic coatings. Typical of such coatings are acrylic or synthetic rubberized latices, vinyl or vinylidene polymers and copolymers. Tarpaulin materials are available with natural or synthetic fiber reinforcement fibers imbedded as a matrics within the Tarpaulin continuous phase, as a fiber reinforcing materials.
One problem with tarpaulins is that they may shrink from the effects of rain, wind and drying sun and therefore rip or tear at certain points of stress. In addition to weakness at stress points due to shrinkage, the effects of wind, water. weight, or snow weight may also cause tearing at stress points. Gentle but continuous movement caused by even light winds may wear away the surface of the tarpaulin at stress points, eventually causing tearing and ripping. This problem can be exacerbated by even slight irregularities in the ride or rub points, like metal or wooden seams, slight angles, or other small surface irregularities, including required devices like windshield wiper posts, and irregularities which might easily occur after manufacturing, such as nicks in the supporting framework, which cause slivers, or trap small pockets of moisture which freeze, creating small bumps which literally wear and tear the fabric of the tarpaulin.
A second problem with tarpaulins in that they can also cause wear to the object that they are supposed to protect, at the points where they “ride” or rub. (Tarpaulins usually rest on appropriate supporting frame structure of the device being protected.) Since the rub point may be a chromed metal tube or a well varnished piece of mahogany or other expensive wood, this can be a very undesirable side effect. (The natural “rides” or rub points will vary from boat to boat or vehicle to vehicle. On a boat, the natural ride points could be thought as the top of the windshield and various pieces of metal fittings, usually tubing, which stand clear of the deck both fore and aft, such as the bow rail and the stern rail or stern cleats.)
A third problem with tarpaulins is that they when they are allowed to follow the natural contours of the extant ride or rub points of the object being protected, they can create a rather shallow angle of coverage which is sometimes insufficient to allow snow slippage or water drainage.
A fourth problem with tarpaulins is that they sometimes can not be tightened (or made taut) as tightly as possible because:
1) to do so could cause undue stress to the natural ride, or rub points.
2) the tarpaulin is slightly oversized due to stretching or to a “one size fits all” approach to manufacturing of the tarpaulin. (Inexact tailoring being cheaper to produce and purchase than specific tailoring.)
A fifth problem with tarpaulins is that they contain many metal fittings, such as metal grommets. These metal fittings may scratch the rub or ride points for a couple of reasons:
1) Unless a tarpaulin is exactly tailored to a specific boat or vehicle, these metal fittings may (by the chance of a poor fit) come in contact with ride or rub points after the tarpaulin is attached.
2) When the tarpaulin is used frequently, such as covering a boat on a daily basis, there is a very good chance that these metal fittings may slide across rub points when the tarpaulin is being attached or removed.
The present invention provides a assembly and a method of solving the problems outlined above. However before reviewing the details of the present invention, several related prior art patents were searched and will now be listed and briefly mentioned. The Applicant notes that they have reviewed the related art and do not find them to be relevant to the present invention.
Hulett U.S. Pat. No. 5,479,872 is patent for an anti-sagging “Support for boatcover” device. It addresses the tarpaulin sagging problem, which is vastly improved by the method of the present invention; however in a completely different way.
Devices for protective padding for covers or tarpaulins, particularly covers of fabric, appear to be nonexistent. A patent issued to William R. Van Loo. U.S. Pat. No. 3,634,925, granted on, Jan. 18, 1972, shows a method of assembling a padded arm rest. In this patent, a channel member is placed in a mold and covered with plastic foam such as polyurethane, vinyl or other suitable material. Metal flanges of the channel are bent to secure the padded arm rest permanently to the chair structure.
Additional patents considered are U.S. Pat. Nos. 2,277,742 to Crawford., Mills U.S. Pat. No. 3,192,542, Schmid II, U.S. Pat. No. 3,973,720, and Wichman. U.S. Pat. No. 4,143,653. However, none of these patented devices solve the problems described above and solved by the present invention.
The device of Crawford U.S. Pat. No. 2,277,742 for protecting canvas tents shows an elongated length of fabric which is adapted to overlie the top edge of a rafter which has attaching clips secured thereto and depending from the bottom face thereof, the clips having terminal portions configured to engage the bottom side edges of the rafter.
The Mills. U.S. Pat. No. 3,192,542 device is for a fabric cover for boats, which essentially comprises a flexible cover for the boat together with bending resilient fastener members secured to the body portion of the cover member at intervals along its edge and having portions thereof which extend across the outer surface of the boat's gunwale guard and resiliently contact the underside of the guard.
The Schmid patent U.S. Pat. No. 3,973,720 is a protective cushioning pad having foldable sections for protecting the edges and corners of articles being packaged. The specific structure and arrangement of this device is substantially different from that of the present invention.
The Wichman patent U.S. Pat. No. 4,143,653 shows a device for splintering broken extremities and comprises a flexible strip having individual perpendicular projections along one edge together with a cushioning element. Again, this structure is entirely different from that of the present invention.
The Keithley patent U.S. Pat. No. 4.940.009 intends to provide the same function as the present invention is related to the present invention. However, the techniques is quite different. Some of the differences are: Keithley describes a series of small pads. The present invention can represent one contiguous cylinder. (Keithley describes a string of protective pads, but contiguous protection is impossible because of the shape of the Keithley pad.) A Keithley pad is in the shape of a (top view) oval cough drop with arms; a front view looks hemispherical with arms. The assembly of the present invention looks like a piece of thick foam tubing with about 20% cut out longitudinally as a very deep groove.
A Keithley pad is held in place by flexible arms, and in other embodiments the arms are supplemented by double-sided tape, adhesives, Velcro, magnets, or a semi-arcuate groove equal in depth to ½
Jaaskelainen, Jr. William
Schoenherr Jeffrey Carl
Urbin Ronald James
Rice Kenneth R.
Shaffer Jr. J. Nevin
LandOfFree
Assembly and method to improve tarpaulin function as a... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Assembly and method to improve tarpaulin function as a..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Assembly and method to improve tarpaulin function as a... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3154201