Static structures (e.g. – buildings) – Means compensating earth-transmitted force – Dynamic force generator
Reexamination Certificate
1999-09-09
2002-10-01
Redman, Jerry (Department: 3634)
Static structures (e.g., buildings)
Means compensating earth-transmitted force
Dynamic force generator
C052S167600, C052S167400
Reexamination Certificate
active
06457285
ABSTRACT:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates generally to systems used to protect structures from damage caused by the addition of external forces. More specifically, the present invention pertains to aseismic foundations used to isolate structures from destructive forces caused by earthquakes and strong winds. The present invention is particularly, though not exclusively, useful as a means for isolating a structure from the forces caused by seismic activity and high winds.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Each year many earthquakes occur around the world resulting in catastrophic loss of life and devastating property damage. In areas along active fault lines, it is important that structures be designed to resist the damage caused by earthquakes. With traditional construction methods, structures are rigidly attached to the earth's surface.
When an earthquake occurs, the vibration of the earth is transferred directly to a structure's foundation, which, in turn, transmits the vibration to the structure. This can result in enormous shear forces which may cause irreparable structural damage to the structure. Moreover, if a structure is subjected to high winds in conjunction with seismic forces, the catastrophic results may be even greater.
Consequently, numerous foundation systems designed to be “earthquake proof” have been invented. These “earthquake proof” foundation systems may be classified as antiseismic or aseismic. The antiseismic class involves foundations which are designed to withstand the great forces caused by earthquakes. These antiseismic systems are bigger and stronger than typical foundation systems and do not allow any motion of the structure relative to its foundation. These systems are not very effective in preventing damage to a structure because the destructive forces are still transmitted through the foundation to the structure.
The aseismic class involves foundations which are designed to isolate the structure from these destructive forces. Aseismic foundations are generally flexible and allow relative motion between the structure and the earth. During an earthquake, this relative motion keeps the structure from being subjected to the destructive forces normally associated with earthquakes.
One such invention, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,181,356, which issued in 1993 to Sul for an invention entitled “Earthquake Resistant Building Support System” (the “'356 patent”), includes a pedestal which rests on a slab. In between the pedestal and the slab is an “O” ring or a sheet of metal to reduce the friction between the pedestal and the slab. The pedestal is fixed to the structure support and moves relative to the slab when the earth shifts back and forth during an earthquake.
The device of the '356 patent is limited with respect to the amount of horizontal motion that it will allow. Moreover, the “O” ring or the sheet of metal sandwiched between the pedestal and the slab does not appear to reduce friction sufficiently to allow any motion at all. On the other hand, if either configuration reduces friction enough to allow some motion, the “O” ring or the metal sheet would be subjected to excessive wear and tear and would be nearly impossible or difficult to replace.
Another such invention, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,771,581, which issued in 1988 to Nill for an invention entitled “Fluid Support System For Building Structures” (the “'581 patent”), includes the use of a liquid support system for separating a structure from its foundation. The device of the '581 patent includes the use of elongated conduits filled with an incompressible it liquid to absorb vertical movement of the foundation wall caused by expanding or contracting soils. This device does not appear to allow any horizontal motion usually associated with earthquakes. Moreover, the device of the '581 patent is unable to account for and provide relief from the forces caused by strong winds in conjunction with seismic activity.
A third aseismic foundation, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,766,706, which issued in 1988 to Caspe for an invention entitled “Earthquake Protection System For Structures” (the “'706 patent”), includes the use of a layer of plates to allow relative motion between the structure and the foundation. One plate is fixed to the top of the foundation, one plate is fixed to the underside of the structure support, and a third plate is sandwiched between these two plates.
During an earthquake, the plates are intended to slide with respect to each other in the horizontal direction. The device of the '706 patent is very complex and would likely be very expensive to build and maintain. Moreover, the device of the '706 patent does not allow any pivotal motion at the structure support, which would account for the situation that occurs when the foundation is moved out of vertical by buckling earth.
Accordingly, it is the object of the present invention to provide an aseismic foundation which will isolate a structure from seismic forces by allowing relative motion between a structure support system and its foundation in the horizontal direction. It is another object of the present invention to provide an aseismic foundation that will allow the foundation to move pivotally with respect to a structure support pillar. It is another object of the present invention to provide an aseismic foundation which will prevent catastrophic damage to a structure when subjected to seismic activity. It is another object of the present invention to provide an aseismic foundation which will prevent catastrophic damage to a structure when subject to high winds in conjunction with seismic activity. It is another object of the present invention to provide an aseismic foundation which will be relatively easy to maintain. It is another object of the present invention to provide an aseismic foundation which will last the lifetime of the structure. It is yet another object of the present invention to provide an aseismic foundation which will be relatively easy to manufacture, relatively easy to install, and relatively cost effective.
SUMMARY OF THE PRESENT INVENTION
The Improved Aseismic System of the present invention includes five major components which may be included in the construction of nearly any new structure erected in a seismically active area. These five components will drastically reduce, if not eliminate, the transmission of the seismic forces to these structures.
The first major component of the Improved Aseismic System of the present invention is the double-action hydraulic ram assembly. The double-action hydraulic ram assemblies are arranged under the base of the structure in a pattern reflecting the perimeter of the structure. Thus, a structure with a square perimeter would have four double-action ram assemblies arranged in a square its base.
Each double-action hydraulic ram assembly includes a large cylindrical housing encasing a hydraulic ram with a vertical piston centered axially on the ram. On each side of the piston is a hydraulic ram fluid chamber filled with an incompressible fluid. During an earthquake, as the tremors cause the earth to shift back and forth, the structure will slide on the rams depending on the direction of the motion caused by the tremor.
As the structure slides, the incompressible fluid is forced out of the hydraulic ram fluid chamber on the trailing side of the structure and into the next major component of the Improved Aseismic System of the present invention, the gas dampener. The gas dampener counteracts the motion of the structure along the double-action hydraulic ram assembly and returns the structure to its original position. Each chamber of the double-action hydraulic ram assembly includes a separate gas dampener.
The Improved Aseismic System of the present invention includes eight gas dampeners. Each gas dampener has three concentric pistons in a single cylinder separated by gases having different pressures. The bottom surface of the first piston in the gas dampener contacts the incompressible fluid shared with
Eastman Gary L.
Redman Jerry
LandOfFree
Aseismic system does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Aseismic system, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Aseismic system will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2928194