Television – Special applications – Observation of or from a specific location
Reexamination Certificate
1999-03-10
2002-10-08
Rao, Andy (Department: 2713)
Television
Special applications
Observation of or from a specific location
C348S151000, C348S143000
Reexamination Certificate
active
06462775
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates to visual surveillance systems, and more particularly to a covert surveillance system which provides remote control of sophisticated camera functions such as zoom, focus, pan, tilt, etc., within a street lamp, and also provides a remote controlled directional antennae.
2. Description of the Related Art
The purpose of a covert surveillance system is to monitor events from a remote or secret location. The equipment for this task ranges from simple television camera systems in banks or stores and metal-detecting devices at airports to airborne heat-sensing devices used by environmental officials to detect water polluters, and secret military satellites with a wide range of detection devices. The choice of surveillance system is dependent on the type of activity that must be monitored.
One of the most popular types of surveillance systems is the closed-circuit television. The closed-circuit television is used to watch banks, convenience stores, police stations, prisons, and other locations requiring constant security. Such systems have been installed in neighborhoods on an experimental basis to allow police departments to monitor high-crime-rate areas. Surveillance systems are in place in such diverse locations as the White House lawn, along portions of the U.S. -Mexican border, and in office buildings, amusement parks, and airports.
One of the problems in using closed-circuit televisions to monitor criminal activity is that the criminals are often aware that they are being watched. In locations such as banks, convenience stores, and prisons, notice of surveillance can often act as a deterrent to crime. However, if the purpose of the surveillance equipment is to capture criminal activity covertly (without tipping off the suspect), the camera for the surveillance system must be hidden.
Referring to
FIG. 1
, a prior art surveillance system
100
is shown which includes a camera
102
mounted to a motor
104
which rotates about a rod
106
suspended from a ceiling
108
. The camera
102
is enclosed within an opaque globe
110
which hides the camera from view. The globe
110
has two lens portals
112
through which the camera
102
can view. In one embodiment, the camera
102
provides continuous video images to a remote monitor (not shown) via a coaxial cable. Other versions of the surveillance system
100
provide one way viewing globes
110
which allow the camera
102
to “see” through the globe at all rotations, while hiding the camera from external view.
While the surveillance system
100
“hides” the camera from external view, the presence of the surveillance system
100
is apparent. The globe
110
may be used to “hide” the momentary direction of the camera
102
, or possibly to protect the camera from external vandalism, but its presence is not disguised. Thus, the surveillance system
100
, while adequate to record activity within a particular location, is not useful for situations where the act of surveillance must be concealed.
A prior art surveillance system that is intended for covert monitoring is shown in
FIG. 2. A
periscope camera
200
is shown extending through a top surface
202
which is intended to be mounted on the roof of a vehicle, for example. The top of the camera
200
has a non-functional antenna
204
that is used to disguise the camera
200
as a cellular antenna, when the top of the camera
200
is flush with the surface
202
. When in use, the camera
200
extends through the surface
202
and captures the desired images via a mirror
206
. The captured images are transmitted to a lens and image capture device (not shown) within a box
208
which is mounted below the surface
202
, and thus out of sight. The camera
200
is useful for instances where a van, or other type automobile, can be parked near the desired viewing area. However, when the vehicle itself would raise suspicion, the camera
200
does not provide an adequate solution.
Now referring to
FIG. 3
, an alternative prior art covert surveillance system
300
is shown. The surveillance system
300
includes a dummy electrical power line transformer
302
which is intended to be connected to a power line (not shown) on a power line pole. Within the transformer
302
is a surveillance camera
304
that views images through a window
306
. The images are typically transmitted to a remote location for viewing and recording.
A problem associated with the surveillance system
300
is that it requires a power line technician to install it on a power line pole. This is often inconvenient, untimely, or expensive. In addition, the viewing window
306
is often observable by sophisticated suspects, thus defeating the covert purpose of the surveillance system. Furthermore, the viewing area of the camera
304
is restricted by the window
306
, making the camera
304
useful in only one direction. And, the surveillance system
300
is useful only in those areas that have above ground power poles. In neighborhoods that have underground electric utilities, the surveillance system
300
is not applicable.
What is needed is a surveillance system which may be mounted in an undetectable location, which allows viewing in multiple directions, and which allows a user to remotely control sophisticated camera functions such as zoom, focus, aperture, pan and tilt. In addition, what is needed is a surveillance system that may be used in a variety of neighborhoods, parks, street corners, etc., without being noticed by sophisticated suspects.
Furthermore, what is needed is a surveillance system with a directional antenna that allows a remote user to monitor activity from remote locations, while obtaining optimum video signals from the surveillance camera.
In addition, what is needed is a surveillance system with a directional antenna, wherein the antenna can be remotely directed.
SUMMARY
To address the above-detailed deficiencies, it is an object of the present invention to provide a remote surveillance system within a street lamp, the surveillance system having a remotely controlled directional antenna.
Accordingly, in attainment of the aforementioned objects, it is a feature of the present invention to provide a remote surveillance system. The remote surveillance system includes camera image transmission logic, image reception logic, remote control logic, and a directional antenna system. The camera image transmission logic views images and transmits the viewed images. The image reception logic receives the transmitted images from the camera image transmission logic. The remote control logic selects images to be viewed by the camera image transmission logic. And, the directional antenna system, receives rotation commands from the remote control logic, and rotates a directional antenna in response to the rotation commands. The camera image transmission logic is substantially enclosed by a street lamp housing.
An advantage of the present invention is that surveillance images obtained by a surveillance camera may be viewed from great distances by including a directional antenna within the surveillance system.
Another advantage is that the remote location for viewing surveillance images may be changed, or moved, while still allowing optimum reception. This is provided for by changing the direction of the directional antenna using remote commands.
In another aspect, it is a feature of the present invention to provide a remote controlled directional antenna coupled to a surveillance camera system. The antenna includes direction command reception logic, to receive antenna direction commands from a remote location; a motor, coupled to the direction command reception logic, for turning in response to the antenna direction commands; and a directional antenna, coupled to the motor, to change direction in response to the turning of the motor. The commands that are transmitted from the remote location cause the directional antenna to be directed to the remote location for optimum reception of signals generated by the surveillance camera system.
Loyd Jaylon D.
Marshall, II Dan H.
Detection Dynamics Inc.
Huffman James W.
Rao Andy
LandOfFree
Apparatus within a street lamp for remote surveillance... does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus within a street lamp for remote surveillance..., we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus within a street lamp for remote surveillance... will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2964477