Apparatus, method, and storage medium for file management

Details Apparatus, method, and storage medium for file management Apparatus, method, and storage medium for file management

2000-12-27

2004-09-21

Amsbury, Wayne (Department: 2171)

Data processing: database and file management or data structures

Database design

Data structure types

C707S793000

Reexamination Certificate

active

06795834

ABSTRACT:

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an electronic library which is a file management apparatus, and more specifically to a system for sweeping and backing up a file registered in the electronic library for electronically guaranteeing the originality of a document.
2. Description of the Related Art
With the latest development of information processing devices, documents conventionally managed on paper have been managed as electronic data. However, since an information processing device can easily copy or falsify a document of electronic data, there is a strong possibility that an original document cannot be detected in a plurality of documents stored in the device. To solve the problem, an electronic library has been developed as an information processing device for managing an electronic original document.
An electronic library, that is, a device for discriminating an original document from a copy, realizes the originality by having the following functions.
(1) An original document can be discriminated from a copy. The original document can be unique when the original document is moved to another electronic library.
(2) When an original document is falsified, it can be detected.
(3) All operations performed on an original document are stored, and all falsification on the operations are detected. Operations refer to all operations such as registering, referencing, updating, moving, copying, generating a backup, sweeping data to another medium, restoring data, etc. In an updating operation, an entity of each generation is stored.
(4) An access right to an original document is controlled.
In these functions, since a file (electronic documents, etc.) is basically stored in a RAID (redundant array of independent disks) device, the entire volume of a stored file is large, and it is necessary to extend a disk or sweep a part of the file to an external medium before the RAID device becomes full.
When a backup file is generated, and a storage medium (a disk, etc.) containing data of an original file is destroyed, the data is restored from a backup medium and to the state that existed at the time of backup. Obviously, the information after the previous backup process cannot be restored. However, it is necessary to maintain the originality (or the uniqueness of an original document) when data is restored after a backup process when an electronic library for discriminating an original document from a copy is managed.
FIG. 1
shows the sequence of documents to be managed as a unit.
When a document
1
is first generated, it is stored in an electronic library as the first version of the document
1
. The first version of the document
1
and the management information about it required by the electronic library to guarantee the originality of the document are managed as a set of information. When the second version of the document
1
is generated by updating the original document of the document
1
, the second version of the document
1
and the management information about the second version of the document
1
are managed as a set of information. Similarly, the third version of the document
1
and the management information about the third version of the document
1
are managed as a set of information. Thus, when the document
1
is repeatedly updated sequentially into the first version through the n-th version, the first through the n-th versions of the same document
1
are referred to as one sequence. That is, when a document is changed by sequentially being updated, the history is referred to as a sequence. Therefore, if two documents are changed by being updated, etc., there exist two sequences of documents.
To guarantee the originality of a document, not only a file server, but also the above mentioned specific functions are required. In addition, when an original document is electronically stored, it is normally stored in a RAID device as with a common file server. When the RAID device is full, it is necessary to add a disk device, or sweep an older file into a tape or an MO. Therefore, the following care different from that of a normal file server is required in controlling the sweeping process.
(1) A file is not to be unconditionally swept. If it can be unconditionally swept, different versions of an original document in the same sequence are swept into different media, thereby complicating the management and maintenance.
(2) Swept information cannot be restored on other devices. If it is possible, there arise not only double original documents, but also serious security problems.
(3) It is necessary to detect the falsification performed on an external medium into which a file is swept. Unless the falsification of the external medium can be detected, there occurs the possibility that the source medium is intentionally damaged, and an illegal original document can be generated from a falsified backup medium
(4) When a swept file is used again, it is necessary to clearly manage as to which medium the file has been swept into.
(5) There can be a case in which an external medium becomes full during the sweeping process, and there is no standby medium at hand.
(6) A sweep history file is to be copied in case of a failure of a RAID-disk. In the following case, a disk can be full in the process of restoring a file after the destruction of a RAID device.
(7) A file is not always swept into an external medium. Since the process of sweeping a file into an external medium is performed through an operator, it may be inconvenient to sweep a file online. A destination medium for a swept file can be another electronic library.
FIGS. 2A
,
2
B,
3
A,
3
B, and
3
C show the cases in which a swept document cannot be restored on a storage medium in a sweeping process.
First, as shown in
2
A, documents A through F stored on the first storage medium such as a disk are totally copied on the second storage medium. Then, as shown in
FIG. 2B
, when a new document G is added, there still remains a space on the first storage medium. Therefore, the document G can be stored.
Then, since the first storage medium has become full as shown in
FIG. 3A
, the documents A through C are to be swept. At this time, the documents A through C are moved to the third storage medium, and simultaneously the history that the documents A through C have been swept is generated. Next, as shown in
FIG. 3B
, documents H through J are added in an empty area obtained as a result of sweeping the documents A through C. When the document stored on the first storage medium is to copied, the difference from the previous backup contents is stored. That is, the documents G through J added after the previous backup are copied, and the history that the documents A through C have been swept is also copied.
Assume that the first storage medium, which is a RAID device, has been destroyed. Then, the documents A through J are to be restored on a new storage medium from the backup contents. However, since the new storage medium only has the capacity of the first storage medium which has been destroyed, the documents A through G can be restored, but the documents H through J cannot be restored on the new storage medium (see FIG.
3
C).
Also when a file is copied with the originality guaranteed, not only a file server, but also the above mentioned specific functions are required. When the original document is electronically stored, it is normally stored on a RAID device as with a common file server. When a backup copy is made, it is stored on a tape device, an MO device, etc. The updated file obtained after the previous backup cannot be restored when the RAID device is destroyed. To avoid this, it is necessary to make a backup file for each transaction, which incurs considerable deterioration in system performance. However, to restore a file after backing it up, the following problems are to be solved in addition to the problems with a common file server.
(1) When a file is to be restored, it is necessary to completely restore the backup information. Partial restoration cannot guarantee th

Affiliated with

Also associated with

Rating

Apparatus, method, and storage medium for file management does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Apparatus, method, and storage medium for file management, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus, method, and storage medium for file management will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

Comments { 0 }

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3260803