Liquid purification or separation – Casing divided by membrane into sections having inlet – Energy recovery from treated liquid
Patent
1984-12-10
1986-11-25
Sadowski, David
Liquid purification or separation
Casing divided by membrane into sections having inlet
Energy recovery from treated liquid
210356, 2104332, 210450, B01D 1300
Patent
active
046247840
DESCRIPTION:
BRIEF SUMMARY
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to apparatus for altering the concentration of a pre-selected component of a feedstock. The invention is applicable to the removal of micron and submicron species from a fluid phase but it is to be understood that it is not limited thereto
For the sake of convenience, the invention will be described in relation to cross-flow retention or filtration in which the pre-selected component or specie is removed from the feedstock by transfer through a barrier adapted to pass the component or specie and to retain the remainder of the feedstock. However, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto as it may equally be applied to the reverse situation in which the preselected specie is introduced through the barrier to the feedstock.
Micron and submicron species (for example, molecules, colloids, particles and droplets) in a fluid phase (for example, an aqueous phase) can be removed in a number of different ways depending on the quantity of species present.
For low concentrations, depth filtration is probably the most common method applied. An alternative approach is to use a surface filter, for example the Nucleopore membrane; this membrane effects removal of particulates by a surface sieving mechanism. Other types of surface membranes are available; these rely on an active surface skin which is backed up by a porous support layer. In particulate filtration operations such membranes behave similarly to Nucleopore membranes.
When the concentration of retained species is high, depth and dead-end surface barriers become much less attractive, as the pressure drop necessary to effect filtration increases rapidly with solids accumulation.
It is to overcome this problem that a new area of micron and submicron species retention is being developed. The technique used is cross-flow retention. In cross-flow retention a surface membrane is used and the build-up of a layer of retained species is minimised by applying a fluid shear field to the upstream fluid adjacent to the barrier surface. This can be done either by stirring or by pumping the fluid across the barrier surface.
According to this technique, it is quite feasible to operate at a steady state in which a solution is effectively split into a permeate and a retentate, and at steady state no more species accumulates at the barrier surface, causing it to lose performance. Alternatively, the system can be operated in a batch mode, and in this case the feed solution gradually increases in concentration, and although this leads to a drop in throughput, the drop is far less than would occur in the dead-end mode where all of the species collect on or in the barrier.
Generally, for each membrane application in the fields of ultrafiltration, dialysis and electrodialysis, the permeability of the membrane system is generally limited by the layer of retained species (i.e. the concentration layer or, eventually the gel layer) which is present. According to the present invention, it is preferred that laminar flow be employed to remove the gel or cake from the surface of the membrane.
In the case of laminar flow there is a relationship for a given concentration of a fluid to be treated and for a given membrane. This relationship links flux, shear rate and length of the filter flowpath.
As given by Blatt et al in 1970, in Membrane Science and Technology, the relationship is in respect of laminar flow conditions and for the gel polarized condition (i.e. when increased pressure does not increase flux). The relationship is given as: (L).sup.-0.33
The shear rate is an expression of the ratio of .nu. the tangential velocity of fluid between adjacent membranes and the height of the filter flowpath or channel, that is: limiting factor to membrane performance, the flux is linked to the shear rate through this ratio. This means that the effect of reducing the channel height or thickness is to increase significantly both the shear rate and the flux.
Generally, in cross-flow retention, the energy involved for recircu
REFERENCES:
patent: 3501010 (1970-03-01), Critchell et al.
patent: 3556302 (1971-01-01), Agranat
patent: 3612281 (1971-10-01), Leonard
patent: 3730350 (1973-05-01), Hoeltzenbein
patent: 3788482 (1974-01-01), Markley
patent: 3864248 (1975-02-01), Granger et al.
patent: 3907687 (1975-09-01), Hoeltzenbein
patent: 3910841 (1975-10-01), Esmond
patent: 3943057 (1976-03-01), Jamet et al.
patent: 4024059 (1977-05-01), Sausse
patent: 4160791 (1979-07-01), Higley et al.
patent: 4234428 (1980-11-01), Schnell
Lacey, R. E. et al, Industrial Processing with Membranes, Wiley-Interscience, N.Y., 1972, p. 211.
Nose, Y., "Critical Review of Renal Prostheses", CRC, Critical Reviews in Bioengineering, Oct. 1972, pp. 255-271.
Gerstman George H.
Memtec Limited
Sadowski David
LandOfFree
Apparatus including a flow path formed by membrane compression does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus including a flow path formed by membrane compression, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus including a flow path formed by membrane compression will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-1157314