Apparatus for merchandise promotion optimization

Data processing: financial – business practice – management – or co – Automated electrical financial or business practice or... – Discount or incentive

Reexamination Certificate

Rate now

  [ 0.00 ] – not rated yet Voters 0   Comments 0

Details

C705S400000

Reexamination Certificate

active

07130811

ABSTRACT:
Apparatus and method for determining an optimum promotion plan for merchandising of products for sale. A scenario/results processor enables a user to prescribe an optimization scenario, and presents the optimum promotion plan to the user, where the optimum promotion plan is determined by execution of the optimization scenario. The demand engine models relationships between potential prices of the products and market demand for the products, where the potential prices correspond to potential promotion events and potential supplier offers. The activity based cost engine estimates demand chain costs for the products based upon the market demand. The promotion optimization engine employs the market demand and the demand chain costs to determine the optimum promotion plan, where the optimum promotion plan maximizes a merchandising performance figure of merit according to the optimization scenario, and where the optimum promotion plan comprises a subset of the promotion events and potential supplier offers.

REFERENCES:
patent: 3017610 (1962-01-01), Auerbach et al.
patent: 4744026 (1988-05-01), Vanderbei
patent: 5063506 (1991-11-01), Brockwell et al.
patent: 5117354 (1992-05-01), Long et al.
patent: 5212791 (1993-05-01), Damian et al.
patent: 5249120 (1993-09-01), Foley
patent: 5299115 (1994-03-01), Fields et al.
patent: 5377095 (1994-12-01), Maeda et al.
patent: 5459656 (1995-10-01), Fields et al.
patent: 5521813 (1996-05-01), Fox et al.
patent: 5615109 (1997-03-01), Eder
patent: 5694551 (1997-12-01), Doyle et al.
patent: 5712985 (1998-01-01), Lee et al.
patent: 5732401 (1998-03-01), Conway
patent: 5765143 (1998-06-01), Sheldon et al.
patent: 5790643 (1998-08-01), Gordon et al.
patent: 5799286 (1998-08-01), Morgan et al.
patent: 5822736 (1998-10-01), Hartman et al.
patent: 5873069 (1999-02-01), Reuhl et al.
patent: 5878400 (1999-03-01), Carter, III
patent: 5918209 (1999-06-01), Campbell et al.
patent: 5933813 (1999-08-01), Teicher et al.
patent: 5987425 (1999-11-01), Hartman et al.
patent: 6009407 (1999-12-01), Garg
patent: 6029139 (2000-02-01), Cunningham et al.
patent: 6032123 (2000-02-01), Jameson
patent: 6032125 (2000-02-01), Ando
patent: 6044357 (2000-03-01), Garg
patent: 6052686 (2000-04-01), Fernandez et al.
patent: 6078893 (2000-06-01), Ouimet et al.
patent: 6094641 (2000-07-01), Ouimet et al.
patent: 6125355 (2000-09-01), Bekaert et al.
patent: 6134534 (2000-10-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6173345 (2001-01-01), Stevens
patent: 6202070 (2001-03-01), Nguyen et al.
patent: 6205431 (2001-03-01), Willemain et al.
patent: 6308162 (2001-10-01), Ouimet et al.
patent: 6321207 (2001-11-01), Ye
patent: 6341268 (2002-01-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6341269 (2002-01-01), Dulaney et al.
patent: 6397193 (2002-05-01), Walker et al.
patent: 6405175 (2002-06-01), Ng
patent: 6456986 (2002-09-01), Boardman et al.
patent: 6546387 (2003-04-01), Triggs
patent: 6553352 (2003-04-01), Delurgio et al.
patent: 6567824 (2003-05-01), Fox
patent: 6684193 (2004-01-01), Chavez et al.
patent: 6697824 (2004-02-01), Bowman-Amuah
patent: 6725208 (2004-04-01), Hartman et al.
patent: 6731998 (2004-05-01), Walser et al.
patent: 6826538 (2004-11-01), Kalyan et al.
patent: 6910017 (2005-06-01), Woo et al.
patent: 6934931 (2005-08-01), Plumer et al.
patent: 6965867 (2005-11-01), Jameson
patent: 2002/0023001 (2002-02-01), McFarlin et al.
patent: 2002/0042739 (2002-04-01), Srinivasan et al.
patent: 2002/0107819 (2002-08-01), Ouimet
patent: 2002/0116348 (2002-08-01), Phillips et al.
patent: 2002/0123930 (2002-09-01), Boyd et al.
patent: 2002/0198794 (2002-12-01), Williams et al.
patent: 2003/0110072 (2003-06-01), Delurgio et al.
patent: WO 98/53415 (1998-11-01), None
Montgomery, A. “Creating Micro-Marketing Pricing Strategies Using Supermarket Scanner Data”, Marketing Science, vol. 16, No. 4, 1997 (pp. 315-337).
Little, JD “BRANDAID: A marketing-Mix Model, Part 1: Structure” Operations Research, vol. 23, No. 4, Jul.-Aug. 1975 (p. 628-655).
Abraham, M. “An Implemented System For Improving Promotion Productivity” Marketing Science, 1993 (p. 248-269).
Abraham, M. “Promoter: An Automated Promotion Evaluation System” Marketing Science, 1987 (p. 101-123).
Cerf, V. and R.E. Kahn, “A Protocol For Packet Network Interconnection,” IEEE Transactions On Communications COM-22, May 1974, (p. 637-648).
Berners-Lee, T. “Hypertext Markup Language 2.0 Working Paper,” Nov. 1995 (pp. 1-3).
Flanagan, D. JavaScript: The Defiitive Guide, 3rd Edition, published by O'Reilly in Jun. 1998 (ISBN: 1-56592-392-8) section 14.8.
Buzzell, DB “The Costly Bargin of Trade Promotion” Harvard Business Review, Mar.-Apr. 1990 (p. 141-149).
Tellis, G. “Tackling The Retailer Decision Maze: Which Brands To Discount, How Much, When and Why,” Marketing Science vol. 1, No. 34, year 1995 (pp. 271-299).
Smith et al. “A Discrete Optimization Model for Seasonal Merchandise Planning.” Journal of Retailing, vol. 74, No. 2, p. 193(29), Summer 1998.
Barth, Brad. “ShopKo Holds the Price Line.” Daily News Record, p. 10, Oct. 4, 2000.
“Essentus and Spotlight Solutions Partnership Delivers Precise Markdown Decisions.” Business Wire, p. 1444, Apr. 17, 2000.
“Manugistics Agrees to Acquire Talus Solutions.” PR Newswire, p. NA, Sep. 21, 2000.
“Goodyear Implements Trilogy's MultiChannel Pricing Solutions as Its Enterprise-Wide E-Pricer Platform.” Business Wire, p. 2286, Jun. 27, 2000.
“IMRglobal Signs New Product Implementation Agreement with Retek to Improve Retail Pricing and Markdown Process.” Business Wire, p. 1590, Jun. 7, 2000.
“New Tools for Modeling Elasticity, Optimizing Prices and Collecting Live Pricing from the Web to Debut at Retail Systems 2000 in Chicago.” Business Wire, p. 1484, Apr. 18, 2000.
“KhiMetrics and Retek Form Marketing Alliance for Comprehensive Retail Pricing Solution.” PR Newswire, p. NA, Feb. 19, 2001.
“KhiMetrics Helps Retailers Increase Margins With Two New Tools for Their Retail Revenue Management Application Suite.” PR Newswire, Mar. 1, 2001.
“Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary”, 10thedition, p. 585, Merriam-Webster Incorporated, 1999.
Hernandez, Mauricio A., and Salvatore J. Stolfo, “Real-world Data is Dirty: Data Cleansing and the Merge/Purge Problem”, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, vol. 2, Issue 1, Jan. 1998.
Alan L. Montgomery and Peter R. Rossi, “Estimating Price Elasticities with Theory-Based Priors,” Journal of Marketing Research vol. XXXVI, Nov. 1999 (pp. 413-423).
Boatwright, Peter et al., “Account-Level Modeling for Trade Promotion: An Application of a Constrained Parameter Hierarchical Model,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 94, No. 448, Dec. 1999 (pp. 1063-1073).
Alan L. Montgomery, “Creating Micro-Marketing Pricing Strategies Using Supermarket Scanner Data,” Marketing Science, vol. 16, No. 4, 1997 (pp. 315-337).
Robert C. Blattberg and Edward I. George, “Shrinkage Estimation of Price and Promotional Elasticities: Seemingly Unrelated Equations,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 86, No. 414, Jun. 1991 (pp. 304-315).
Arnold Zellner, “On Assessing Prior Distribution sand Bayesian Regression Analysis With G-Prior Distributions,” Elsevier Science Publishers, 1986 (pp. 233-243).
A.F.M. Smith, “A General Bayesian Linear Model,” University of Oxford, Apr. 1972.
D. V. Lindley and A.F.M. Smith, “Bayes Estimates for the Linear Model,” University College, Dec. 1971.
George C. Tiao and Arnold Zellner, “On the Bayesian Estimation of Multivariate Regression,” University of Wisconsin, Jan. 1964.
Arnold Zellner, “An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias,” University of Wisconsin, Jun. 1962.
“PCT International Search Report”, Application No. PCT/US03

LandOfFree

Say what you really think

Search LandOfFree.com for the USA inventors and patents. Rate them and share your experience with other people.

Rating

Apparatus for merchandise promotion optimization does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.

If you have personal experience with Apparatus for merchandise promotion optimization, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus for merchandise promotion optimization will most certainly appreciate the feedback.

Rate now

     

Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-3681729

  Search
All data on this website is collected from public sources. Our data reflects the most accurate information available at the time of publication.