Surgery – Instruments – Corneal cutter or guide for corneal cutter
Reexamination Certificate
1999-04-27
2001-03-06
Buiz, Michael (Department: 3731)
Surgery
Instruments
Corneal cutter or guide for corneal cutter
Reexamination Certificate
active
06197038
ABSTRACT:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates generally to the field of refractive corneal surgery and, in particular, to the use of a refractive laser in conjunction with an automated lamellar keratoplasty, so-called LASIK (laser-in-situ keratoplasty). The present invention teaches a novel apparatus for improving the creation of the lamellar corneal flap.
LASIK (laser-in-situ keratoplasty) is a refractive laser procedure used to correct refractive errors such as myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism. Aspects of the procedure are disclosed and claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,840,175, to Peyman et al and No. 4,903,695, to Warner et al. In general the refractive procedure requires the creation of a lamellar corneal flap. A variety of mechanical cutting devices have been described to create the lamellar flap. These devices, generally known as “microkeratomes”, differ principally in how they drive the blade (e.g. gears vs. cable) and how they flatten (applanate) the cornea during the lamellar cut. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,586,980, to Kremer et al discloses a microkeratome device.
The prior art microkeratome devices all share in common the creation of flaps of variable depth and size, depending somewhat upon corneal curvature. That is to say, “steep” corneas (e.g. central keratometry greater than 46 diopters) produce flaps of different size and thickness than do “flat” corneas (e.g. central keratometry less than 41 diopters). This variation occurs because the prior art devices all require an applanation of the cornea through a suction ring during the keratectomy. In the case of an extremely flat cornea, for example, the likelihood of an amputated flap (corneal cap) is very high. Variations in flap diameters compromise the laser correction by limiting the diameter of the ablation, which in turn affects centration and the degree of maximum correction and also may result in side effects, such as halos and ghosting.
Moreover, all these prior art devices use high suction pressure (elevates intraocular pressure to 90 mm Hg or more) to firm up the globe during the keratectomy. Loss of suction during the keratectomy can result in complications such as irregularly thick flap, lacerated flap, amputated flap, and aborted flap creation. Generally speaking, if the suction break occurs before completion of the keratectomy and it is detected by the surgeon, the case is aborted. The high intraocular pressure (often 90 mm Hg or more) created by a suction apparatus of the prior art can have well-recognized, serious complications such as intraocular vascular occlusion, macular hemorrhage, and retinal detachments.
Prior art lamellar keratectomy microkeratomes also share another common limitation, i.e., they all create a dome-shaped flap. The central thickness is generally desired to be 150-200 microns in order to provide adequate peripheral thickness. This flap contour is disadvantageous because it can mask the underlying stromal contour created by the laser ablations. In a myopic correction, for example, the laser creates a central concavity in the stromal bed, but the flap has a central convexity because of its dome shape.
Furthermore, the thin flap edges created by prior art devices are prone to melt. The flap edges are on the surface or the cornea, resulting in a greater likelihood that the flap will be distorted, displaced, or torn free by eyelid blinking or minor trauma such as rubbing the eyes. Prior art procedures rely upon hydrostatic pressure to seal the flap to the surface of the cornea.
Besides mechanical cutting microkeratomes which use oscillating metal or gem blades, other cutting modalities have been introduced such as pressured water jets, as provided in U.S. Pat. No. 5,643,299 to Blair, or lasers such as erbium:YAG. Nevertheless, these prior art techniques and devices share the aforementioned limitations of the mechanical cutting microkeratomes.
In my co-pending application Ser. No. 09/188,160, I provide an apparatus and method to eliminate the aforementioned limitations of the prior art. As such, that device provides an optionally thinner, but uniformly thick corneal flap of precisely determined diameter, regardless of corneal curvature. Furthermore, that device more reliably reproduces the curvature created by the laser, eliminates the risk of flap amputation (free cap), eliminates the risk of flap distortion, displacement, or tearing, and reduces the risk of epithelial ingrowth and eliminates the risk of complications associated with high suction pressure, such as intraocular vascular occlusion. However, the present invention discloses an improvement over that device and provides a novel apparatus for the microkeratome device used in creating a lamellar corneal flap and is intended to be used so as improve the method of performing the procedure disclosed in co-pending application Ser. No. 09/188,160.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
It is among the various objects of the present invention to provide an apparatus to create a corneal flap in lamellar keratoplasty or keratectomy of a precisely determined diameter regardless of corneal curvature.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an apparatus which creates a corneal flap of predetermined thickness, uniformly from center to periphery of the cornea.
It is still another object of the present invention to provide an apparatus which creates a corneal flap without an excessive increases in intraocular pressure.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an apparatus which reliably creates a corneal flap with a reduce risk of creating an amputated flap (free cap) regardless of corneal curvature.
It is another object of the present invention to provide an apparatus and method which reliably seats a corneal flap in a recessed position with reduced risk of flap distortion, flap displacement, flap amputation (free cap), flap melt, or epithelial ingrowth.
In accordance with the invention, generally stated, a device for creating a corneal flap is provided which includes an aperture located just below the plane of a cutting blade and through which the corneal plug protrudes in preparation for the lamellar cut of the microkeratome.
Another preferred embodiment features a transparent plate or applanation plate located a predetermined distance above the cutting blade and against which the corneal plug abuts or applanates. Another preferred embodiment features an adjustable mechanical stop located at or near the cutting blade plane for the prevention of a complete transection of the corneal flap.
In another preferred embodiment, the second ring (aperture) has a cutting blade (trephine) attached to its underside for creation of a circular, elliptical, ovoid, or other desired shape of keratotomy.
REFERENCES:
patent: 4662370 (1987-05-01), Hoffmann et al.
patent: 4840175 (1989-06-01), Peyman
patent: 4903695 (1990-02-01), Warner et al.
patent: 5556406 (1996-09-01), Gordon et al.
patent: 5586980 (1996-12-01), Kremer et al.
patent: 5989272 (1999-11-01), Barron et al.
Buiz Michael
Denk Paul M.
Truong Kevin
LandOfFree
Apparatus for lamellar keratoplasty does not yet have a rating. At this time, there are no reviews or comments for this patent.
If you have personal experience with Apparatus for lamellar keratoplasty, we encourage you to share that experience with our LandOfFree.com community. Your opinion is very important and Apparatus for lamellar keratoplasty will most certainly appreciate the feedback.
Profile ID: LFUS-PAI-O-2513567